“Tad, I called you privately because I felt this was a private matter.”
Tad’s response:
“Yeah, it bloody well was. Ideally it should've stayed a private matter between the only two people it really concerned. And I don't recall you being one of them - or even KNOWING one of them for about a quarter century after the fact.”
Bob K’s quote: (posted by Tad Wed., Dec., 14, 2011 3:20 pm)
“That's also why my posted reference was non-specific.”
Bob K’s quote: (posted by Tad Wed., Dec., 14, 2011 3:20 pm)
“If I boot you permanently it will be due to my concerns over the topic we discussed on the phone. This forum should be a safe place for people of varying ages to visit. You have not given me any assurances that's true with you on this forum.”
“Tad--
And just how much of a code cracker did you think it would take to blow that one open?
“Bob K:
“Please don't blame me.”
“Tad:
“I'm rather afraid I DO. It's your name that appears above that last quote.”
Bill C: TAD, I SAW A POST ON THE OZ REPORT BY JIM THAT HAD INFORMATION CONCERNING YOUR PAST LEGAL HISTORY. I DIDN’T KNOW ANYTHING FIRST HAND SO I DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING TO ANYONE.
ABOUT A MONTH AGO IN A PHONE CONVERSATION (THE CALL I’M REFERRING TO WASN’T BOB BY THE WAY) I HEARD THE SAME THING AS WAS POSTED ON THE OZ REPORT. THAT WAS STILL SECOND HAND INFORMATION AND I DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING TO ANYONE. THE FIRST TIME I HAD ANY FIRST HAND INFORMATION WAS FROM YOUR POST.
IF YOU THINK BOB OUTTED/OUTING YOU BEFORE YOU DID YOURSELF THEN COPY/PASTE ---
(I CAN’T BELIEVE I JUST ASKED FOR THAT!) ----
THE POST AND TIME/DATE STAMP WHERE BOB DID. I COULD WELL HAVE MISSED IT BUT I WENT BACK AND STILL CAN’T FIND IT.
WITH THE BLIZZARD OF WORDS THAT YOU POST IT’S POSSIBLE THAT I MISSED IT TWICE BUT MORE THAN LIKELY EVEN YOU CAN’T REMEMBER WHAT EXACTLY WAS SAID/TYPED.
UNTIL I SEE THE POST WITH THE TIME/DATE STAMP WHERE BOB POSTED WHAT YOU ARE SAYING HE POSTED I AM STALLED ON THIS ONE ISSUE OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE BEING DISINGENUOUS AT BOB’S EXPENSE.
BELOW IS A QUOTE FROM SAM, I THINK!
“Preflight, Hangcheck, Know you're hooked in.”
“TAD:
which is a flat contradiction of everyone's rating qualifications and the absolute best way I know to get someone killed in this sport, but I don't see you doing much to address that one.
“PREFLIGHT (COMMA) HANG CHECK (COMMA) KNOW YOU’RE HOOKED IN PERIOD)”
FLAT CONTRADICTION?
WHAT IF THE LIFT AND TUG WAS THE KNOW YOU’RE HOOKED IN PART?
FLAT CONTRADICTION?
