A place for discussions that are NOT related to the US Hawks. This area is provided for the convenience of our members, but the US Hawks specifically does not endorse any comments posted in these forums.
Forum rules Be Polite!!
This forum is for discussions that are NOT related to the US Hawks. This area is provided for the convenience of our members, but the US Hawks specifically does not endorse any comments posted in this forum.
He was initially arrested in 2014 after the crew of Air1, the Winnipeg police helicopter, saw him in the sky above Wilkes Avenue and Charleswood Road. Gibson did not have a licence to operate power paragliding equipment inside city limits. He was charged with dangerous operation of an aircraft.
Gibson has claimed on several previous occasions in court that government has no right to prosecute him. He is part of the so-called Freemen on the Land movement, which has tied up the courts in what are often deemed frivolous, time-wasting battles.
These are actions aimed at destruction of my human rights, Gibson said during a court appearance last year. This is an unlawful summons.
Freeman busted for unlicensed travelling - in the air Postby Burnaby49 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:05 am
Apparently even if you don't get behind the wheel of a car or use the public roads you didn't pay for you can't exercise your charter given Freeman right to travel without getting busted. In this case Tony, our hero, found the perfect solution for travelling around Winnipeg without a driver's license, he flew over it in a paraglider and was busted by a police helicopter! At least a new approach to the problem.
Probably just an isolated incident. Mr. Weeks, the promoter, has a nice suit. I'm sure he wouldn't do something stupid like run a sleazy charity donation tax shelter, would he? Not with a silly name like "FAST - Fight Aids Save Taxes", right? Wrong;
Fight AIDS Save Taxes! (FAST) claims to help people suffering from HIV-AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa through a tax shelter scheme fuelled by money from Canadians willing to circumvent federal tax laws for the sake of philanthropy and profit.
Headquartered out of a strip mall in a remote part of St. Albert, Alta., the organization solicits donations and uses that money to obtain loans to purchase anti-retroviral drugs for African AIDS patients.
Donors are issued tax receipts for the full amount of the loan that they can then use to claim large tax credits on annual income tax returns.
I can't say I recall the Fight AIDS Save Taxes! scheme but it is just one of many donation in kind schemes that donated worthless pharmaceuticals to African AIDS groups and claimed huge values for the drugs for donation purposes. They'd buy very heavily discounted drugs from third world manufacturers which were almost worthless because they were on the edge of their expiry dates. The Canadian participants would get tax donation receipts based on the cost to buy the same drugs, newly manufactured in Canada, in Canadian pharmacies at retail prices under prescription rather than the bulk fire-sale prices they were actually acquired at.
Other schemes did things like buying a shipload of unsorted broken third-rate rice in Thailand then give the whole shipment "as is" to a third world government. The scam was to have taxpayers donate to the scheme on the basis they were paying for and donating the rice indirectly. The scheme promoters would charge them say five times the price it paid for the rice on a per pound basis then write a donation receipt giving a per pound value of say twenty times the actual price based on the price that high quality rice sold for in small packages in supermarket in Toronto or Vancouver. Taxpayers gave themselves big warm fuzzy hugs for being so generous and helping the third world then they claimed tax refunds much higher than their actual donated amounts thereby making the so-called donations big profit generators. Until it all fell apart. The CRA went after all of them and it didn't end well. I attended one promotional high-pressure seminar where the speaker said the scheme was foolproof because the CRA had no legal right to challenge any amount, no matter how ridiculous, that a charity put on a donation receipt. He said the CRA was legally oblidged to accept them. Unfortunately for the suckers that bought into these schemes the CRA though otherwise.
So, wonder what else is going on with Tony and Mandy. Hey! The Business Development Bank is suing them and EcoVillage for a half million!
CI14-01-91715 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT BANK OF VS 5926115 MANITOBA INC.
... but they counterclaimed and among the counterclaim defendants are: "Governor General of Canada and Attorney General of Canada (As Members of the Queen's Privy Council). So they've apparently gone OPCA. The counterclaim is set to be struck out on January 29, 2015. So, I'd say Tony and Mandy's little campground was a bust.
Tony also is a defendant in a $25000 action: CI14-01-92587 BRYANT, GORDON vs 5926115 MANITOBA INC. that has just started.
There's also a $9000ish unpaid utility action back in 2012: SC12-06-14438 MANITOBA HYDRO vs 5926115 MANITOBA INC.
Surprisingly neither seems to have any income tax related issues that I can find. "Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
Exposing Another Political Fallacy - Physical Location Doesn't Equal Presence Within a State. Is this a proper analogy? Is a belief that by threat of violence at the hands of police officers, with guns, at the direction of a judge, that he/she/(GLBT) actually has jurisdiction over you? What creates jurisdiction? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WFg5O3vB1s
I found another tax man that either doesn't know the answer to the question or is withholding evidence. I think he doesn't know the answer, but neither do I. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O26xRjJ6jjU