RickMasters wrote: Paragliding will destroy hang gliding. Commercial tandem operators of both disciplines will assist.
Real pilots who love free flight on robust, airframed aircraft will never find a better time than now to abandon the sinking ship of the USPA and form a new, alternative organization with NO PARAGLIDERS and NO FLIGHTS OFFERED FOR MONEY.
Burnabycitizenstandard
2012/04/30
at 7:04 PM ETDo a search for Groupon deals under the pilot's name and you will see he has sold 770 deals at half-price in the past few months. They all expire before July 27th. A good question to ask is: Should extreme sports be sold en mass on daily dealy sites? Will there be enough manpower to deal with the huge influx of couponers and gift certificates without sacrificing safety?
Most important of all: Should a life-risking extreme sport be treated as a bargain gift that you get at a 50% discount? We are not dealing with spa or restaurant visits here. We are dealing with actual human lives.
RickMasters wrote:[note to myself: stop posting info here. it cannot be corrected, updated, deleted or added to]
bobk wrote:RickMasters wrote:[note to myself: stop posting info here. it cannot be corrected, updated, deleted or added to]
The current policy is to allow a 1-hour change period on each post. The purpose is to keep people from "rewriting history" when it becomes convenient.
If you have typos or other minor changes, I can make them for you. But substantial changes are best handled by subsequent posts containing the corrections.
My goal is to preserve what people write so it can be reviewed objectively. Please contrast that with other sites where posters can rewrite their history or where moderators take considerable liberty with what people have posted.
You can trust what you read on US Hawks because we don't modify it after the fact. I hope that's something you can respect.
RickMasters wrote:But if one shares information, there has to be a path to keep the info current. Things change.
Without, we are left only with opinions which lead only to argument.
It is more important to me to have an accurate record of fact for me rather than an inaccurate historical archive for somebody else.
Merlin wrote:To expect to be able to go back and tinker with your part in conversations seems unreasonable unless all the edited versions are included in the post.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests