Page 1 of 1

Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:52 pm
by WingedGringo
Hey you Hawksters,
I know some of you have been following my legal absurdities. Here is the latest...
http://www.JohnOlson.blog.com
Enjoy! :D :crazy: :srofl:

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:08 pm
by Bill Cummings
So does Winged Gringo mean Charlie shot you out of the sky financially or that you have a wing?
I sold another Gray one of your thrilling books today (no relationship) and he left here, Las Cruces, for Southern Cal. in his flip flops. It was about 45 today. I think the Santa Ana winds started here in Santa Teresa, NM. :srofl:

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:01 pm
by terryJm
Hello Winged Greengo, and welcome to the Hawks. Your blog site was informative and fun, can't wait to read your work ( we could have a copy signing day at the library ,I'm working at 'Leakey Public Library' if ever You should stop by) and as you know the outcome of the problem in the Islands effects us all. My sympath goes out to you in regards to the LEAGLE, MEDICAL, or inforcement establishments controled by vampires, we also have problems with trolls, IEdios, and other assorted monsters, soon to be addressed in an appropriat manor. Any time your are in SW Texas, please feel free to visit, we can use more test pilots for all our new eqpt. Later, tjm

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:49 pm
by TadEareckson
1. How many books do you burn on a really good day?

2. If you got the Bible section down to five or six thousand copies might you have room for an aviation text or dictionary?

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:08 pm
by miguel
:crazy: Maybe you can fluff up the story into a movie plot.

Good luck and you will need lots of it.

Do your e-books translate to computer screens? Can't see buying an e-reader when printed pages work so well.

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:15 pm
by WingedGringo
Gracia Bill as always and Terry too. Tad I'm afraid you lost me. Miguel yes my books are available in all electronic formats, and you get color photos too.

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:36 pm
by TadEareckson
Sorry. I was intending to lose Terry.

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:11 am
by Bill Cummings
TadEareckson wrote:Sorry. I was intending to lose Terry.

Oops!
The "winged gringo" was referring to my wife Terry not to the other Terry on this website.
It is interesting how the same words can mean different things.
Like, "I'm so gay!" Thirty years ago that inspired no confusion at all. Back then the phrase had no connection with a closet or having just left it. I suppose using the word closet now days can deposit a reader to a different page than that which was intended thirty years ago. "Don't touch that dial!" went out with the trash. Kids today would say,"WHAT!" :roll:
And do not forget phrases like, "Stick it in your ear!" can sound quite annal if you are sloppy with your pronunciation. :srofl: And even if you are not. (rear---get it? gee but some of you are slow.) :srofl:

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:22 pm
by Bob Kuczewski
billcummings wrote:So does Winged Gringo mean Charlie shot you out of the sky financially or that you have a wing?

As in "Charlie shot to kill, but missed and only winged him"?

So he's a "Winged Gringo". :srofl:

Re: Charles Gray vs John McAfee et al

PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:22 pm
by Bill Cummings
Winged Gringo.
I still can’t get past your blogs security to post there so I’ll post here in case you check in.
I see where you got some junk mail (is that what an injunction is?) that says you no longer have the rights of the first amendment to speak the truth about the malicious prosecution that you had to endure.
Even I know first hand that the lawyer harassing you did not do his due diligence since you didn’t own the property in question where the alleged injury happened.
The land office or assessors office had that information.
The deposition shows that you hadn’t entered into a business deal with the plaintiff. Not being a lawyer myself I still would have researched something as basic as that. :wtf:
So the judge threw the case out and you don’t have the right to speak up on the internet that you were screwed and by whom? I wonder if I can start a blog and post my copies of the depositions which by the way must be sealed now?
They are no longer a matter of public record in the courts? :wtf:
I overheard the lawyer on YOUR speaker phone while we were in the Douglas, AZ, Walmart parking lot, loading our groceries, when the lawyer (allegedly) threatened you by saying, ---we can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way,---
Ole if you didn’t perceive that to be a threat --I sure did at the time.
Time has proved up. He gave it to you the hard way. (was it good for you?)
The thousands that you spent on the lawyer for yourself will not be recoverable, I’m sure, because lawyer payments probably can’t be called damages I’ll bet.
It will be tough proving you are innocent of not doing anything wrong.
I can’t prove that I was breathing all last year. It would only be strong circumstantial evidence, which more than likely, will not rise to the standard of the courts around SW NM. :crazy: If I was handed an injunction that said I couldn't bitch about being screwed that would be just about too much to take :evil: (and there are people that would say, --I can't figure why the guy snapped he was such a nice quiet fellow.--)