U.S. Hang Gliding Pilots




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Graeme Henderson (GH)
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:23 am 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
The World Hang Gliding Association
is pleased to announce its awarding over Graeme Henderson (GH)
the Flex-Wing Hang Glider Gold Air Award. His story joins
an elite selection of people who contributed significantly to
flexible wing hang glider technology forwarding.

GH, as with most humans, if not nearly all, has been a mixed blessing to the
flex-wing hang glider technology scene. His positive contribution has
several parts to it:

1. GH brought out for all a rich story on one water-ski kite-glider man.
That GH supports some very important untenable statements does
not keep him from shining with his positive deep work over one man.
May such energy generally finally be effective in moving others to place on the table a rich
story for each participant in the HG community; such is possible now
with the advent of the Internet.

Even though GH bullied untenables to help the generally good FAI fail the hang gliding community
in some important texts, there is cause to celebrate GH's tenacity where
the wheat and thorny weeds rolled together. The hang gliding community
will have years of work ahead to correct for the untenables while having
one of our community better known; assuming the hang gliding community
will grow in its critical-thinking quotient, the WHGA holds to celebrating
the gift of GH in the flexible-wing sector; the untenables will test the mettle
of the hang gliding community; that test could bring positive maturity.

2. Some effects of the GH phenomenon:
a. Movement to counter the GH untenables will continue to sharpen hang glider history text for all.

b. Orgs will be invited to become sharper as they approach historical statements.

c. The HG community is invited to get clearer about how to describe innovation.

d. The developers and appreciators are invited to distinguish the generative
aspects of ornamental appearance design from the aspects of global mechanical invention.

e. The HG community is further along in its appreciation of just what global mechanical arts
reside in the open-source pool of art referred to as the Public Domain. Those who would
care to add to hang glider technology are perhaps now more apt to do robust homework
over the contents of the public domain before declaring themselves global mechanical inventor
on some matter.

f. Perhaps the visibility of debaters will improve future debating. The process and its record just
might let the next generation of hang gliding participants be better at open debate.

g. The HG community is challenged more than ever to bring balance to our texts by giving
equivalent energy to support the story of each participant. One of the gifts of the GH flow
informs us about the potential stories behind each person. When a full robust display is out for each,
then balance will be restored away from the severe tilt.

3. Focus on GH will continue in a hang glider history (hgh) folder: http://www.energykitesystems.net/hgh/GHTest/GraemeHenderson/index.html
Essays on the GH phenomenon are invited and will be hosted; there will be researchers with something to say on topic.

4. The WHGA does not side with the GH untenables, does not side with the GH bully tactics,
but does side with the positive aspects of the GH flow. Indeed the full package as "human" mix is also celebrated, as the weeding will exercise our talents and make the community stronger, sharper, fuller, and finally more able to weather storms and do positive creative works. Ultimately, the community of those interested in hang gliding will be better for having GH in its fold. Thanks for being you, GH. Morph as you might.

This topic thread in USHawks history section invites continued exploration of the "GH" and its actual "GH Test". The above is only a brief outline of the GH sector. Explore involved issues; many issues involved are not yet even well stated; we are as infants on the growth road of hang glider history.

We trust that GH will spend his new gold to bless himself and others. :thumbup: ______________________ :wave: :wave: :wave:

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:34 pm 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8372
Location: San Diego, CA
That sounds like a "Silver Lining" / "Lemons to Lemonade" approach.      Good for you Joe!!      :clap:

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 7:59 pm 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
As predicted GH continues to grab attention for himself by shouting untenable statements to the world.
At an important video comment section, GH does his big shout of untenables. He puts out statements that are not true at a shotgun rate.
For GH posterity here is a screen print of his rant:

Attachment:
Feb2016OttoVideoCommentbyGHnegUNTENABLE.JPG
Feb2016OttoVideoCommentbyGHnegUNTENABLE.JPG [ 92.81 KiB | Viewed 9101 times ]

Grame Henderson in Feb. 2016 with many untenables again wrote:
Johannes, The Hawks is a bad site. Nothing read there should be believed. It is even worse than Sikipedia. Faust and Tony Prentice have been dishonest in their claims and inflating their role in hang gliding history for decades. Faust though was the first to spot the fact that Rogallo was lying about his involvement. Go to the Lilienthal Museum, or australian-hang-gliding-history.com for the true story. Faust says modern hang gliding started with him and Prentice claims he invented the modern hang glider in England. Lilienthal flew the first glider, but he was still a long way from having a viable aircraft that anyone could fly. That is why they were not built in the thousands. Lilienthal proved that heavier than air flight was possible, but he lacked both a safe airfoil and a safe control system.
Others tried to build a decent hang glider from then on. Chanute made the biggest contribution and clubs were even formed with people flying Chanute hang gliders. But they were too complex, fragile, and difficult to store and transport. And most of the participants were aiming for powered flight.
September 8 1963 was when we got the first viable hang glider, and it became possible for thousands to fly.
Tony Prentice tried and failed for years. He makes bold claims but refuses to provide a single scrap of evidence. We know however that in the end he simply cloned the Dickenson Wing that he saw Geoff McBroom flying, and then he started actually flying. He has to work hard these days, the internet means his stories are no longer viable so he runs an anti-John Dickenson campaign with Joe Faust, and a guy named Gerry Farrell who publishes their lies on Wikipedia as Batteryincluded.


His untenables corrected:
1. Find US Hawks as a good site with much matter to be believed. Find statements in the forum to be factual, friendly, and believable with the proviso that friendly correction is made when a statement is found in need of correction. Great site here.
2. Gradually Wikipedia gets sharpened by editors from around the world. Incompleteness occurs. But wikipedia is accurate that a battened flexible wing foot-launch hang glider with triangle control frame cable-stayed and with pilot hung from keel behind the A-frame was extant in 1908 at a sport hang gliding meet; W. Simon owner; and he took out some legal papers to protect his configuration. Such was with the control system used in most contemporary hang gliders. Many others following such use occurred. John Worth way before 1963 used the triangle control frame in a hang glider. See:
3. Faust and Prentice have deepenly worked to get hang gliding history clear.
4. Joe Faust never found Rogallo to lie.
5. Rogallo was not lying about his involvement in hang gliding. GH has put up paper-tigers and then burnt such. Such tactics does not win validity.
6. The filed first GH article holds at least 10 serious untenable overclaims for the guy GH loves as center of his made-up definition of "modern" hang gliding. Those original untenables have been faced well for the past 7 years or so. GH does not budge.
7. Faust never said he started modern hang gliding. See what Faust says in part: http://www.energykitesystems.net/WHGA/F ... Award.html
8. Prentice did not claim he invented the modern hang glider in 1960. Rather, Prentice gave facts that he as young teen made a flexible wing hang glider with a kind of triangle control system of lines. Yes, 1960.
9. Otto Lilienthal made 2000 successful flights with his many airfoils. He had weight-shift control of his hang gliders. Otto had an incident and died from the crash.
10. Tony Prentice has forwarded loads of evidence for his various hang glider designs and builds. He continues such habit. We know him as ARP.
11. Otto Lilienthal was first in history to commercialize the manufacture of hang gliders. He patented one of his designs. He made and serialized copies of his hang glider. One of the copies got to US. Being first in world on something as grand as what Otto invites careful high praise.
12. Chanute's Hargrave evolutes in biplane hang gliders rooted an unstoppable line of successes in hang gliding and powered aircraft. The flow of biplane hang gliders is not a closed chapter in hang gliding. The biplane hang glider rooted technology used in part in the Wright success with biplane powered planes. Volmer Jensen in early 1940s and Spratt and many others pre-1950 found the biplane hang glider as very viable for safe flight; very strong; controls were adapted by Volmer for full three-axis control.
13. Viable hang gliders existed before the kite of Sept 8, 1963. See the link at point 7. above.
14. The three writers mentioned have had a running effort to show the GH flow of untenables, overclaims. They have no anti-JD flow; they have anit-untenables habit. And GH is saturated with untenables as he grabs attention for himself by shouting the untenables; there is no sign of his quieting or reducing his flow. He does not recognize W. Simon, James Hobson, John Worth, Thomas Purcell, Tony Prentice, and many others for there contributions that undermine his overclaims that he publishes and pushes. GH smokescreens overclaims with a flow of documents that do not overcome his overclaims.
15. The energy to bring good history in the face of so many GH overclaims is a program of care for history, not an anti-someone thing.
16. There was no global invention in the ski kite of Sept. 8, 1963. There was a personal tinkering built by a ski-kiter at that point. See prior art by studying the links and information at the link at point 7. above.

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:41 am 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:46 am
Posts: 280
It is a great pity that the wonderful film about Lilienthal's gliding flights, put together by Johannes, has been marred by Graeme Henderson's comments that have nothing to do with the content of it.

Mr Henderson's statements of what Joe Faust has said and of claims that I have made are complete fabrications on his part. As I have not made the statements there is absolutely no reason for me to substantiate them with "evidence".

There is a trail of correspondence spread over about 10 years which can be referenced by anyone wishing to check what I am saying is correct. If anyone does do so they will find that Mr Henderson has tried character assassination of anyone that dares oppose or is a threat to his "history" of hang gliding. Again it is also a pity because John Dickenson's story stood on its own merits without the excessive claims made by Henderson and other disciples of John Dickenson.

Mr Henderson has run his campaign as a war with the result that he now claims victory. However it is a hollow 'victory' as it was Lilienthal that provided the spark for the sport we all enjoy not any latter day designer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:06 am 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8372
Location: San Diego, CA
ARP wrote:
Mr Henderson's statements of what Joe Faust has said and of claims that I have made are complete fabrications on his part. As I have not made the statements there is absolutely no reason for me to substantiate them with "evidence".


It is generally impossible for a person to prove that they didn't say or do something. That's why civilized societies have rules of evidence that place the burden of proof on the accuser.

This may seem like a somewhat abstract concept, but it is fundamental to justice. Unfortunately, this concept is lost on many folks in the sports of hang gliding and paragliding. :(

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:04 am 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
Graeme is organizing another celebration based on untenable statements regarding invention and first. One response is the following:


Email to Graeme on August 18, 2018, in response to his continued celebration of untenable statements as invention and firsts:

Get it right and balanced

The modern hang glider was not invented in Grafton;
and the first flight of a modern hang glider was not done in Grafton.
Celebrate Grafton's entry to kiting and gliding as one might;
but to celebrate false "invention" has its heavy costs on the spirit and on community.
Starters: http://www.energykitesystems.net/WHGA/FlexWingHangGliderGoldAirAward.html
Then realize a high aspect ratio flexwing with battens with triangle control frame was at a 1908 sport hang gliding meet.
To push false invention on the world injures aviation history in many ways.
Lift,
Joe

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 6:55 pm 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
Quote:
August 18, 2018

G'Day Joe,
Long time no talk !!! I am always dismayed at the concentration on John Dickenson and his accreditation with "Inventing" modern hang gliding.

John Dickenson built a kite to be towed behind a boat. That was the task he was given. That was based in public domain knowledge of the Rogallo wing format,
Aerostructures was approached by Dickenson to build his Skiwing but we refused on the basis that it was structurally and aerodynamically inadequate. We agreed to build a Skiwing using our Skiplane wing and Dickenson's harness which we thought then was a good idea. Of course now we know that harness dated back decades. Aerostructuires sold Bill Moyes a Skiwing and spent time with him providing instructions and repairs. Bill Moyes progressed from water borne towing to land borne towing then started foot launching. Moyes is responsible for extensive promotion of modern hang gliding. While all that was going on we produced 44 Skiplanes and to my knowledge there was never an accident involving injury or death. That was our design intention. There is a lot of incorrect information in the media which is disappointing but who really cares ??

I am writing an autobiography around my aviation experiences and the full Skiplane story will be in that. Turned 80 recently, semi retired but still involved in aviation D and D projects.

Take Care
Mike Burns



Joe Faust
6:59 PM (0 minutes ago)
to Mike

Happy Birthday! Mike !
Congratulations! So glad autobiography will be! Keep me informed.

Is the following treatment OK with you:
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1417&p=23616#p23616

I share a habit of D&D ... regarding "busable hang gliders". I will let you know when I am busing with a satisfying wing.

Best to you and yours,

Joe Faust

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:11 pm 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
ARP sent in a further historical note:

Quote:
However it is interesting to see the similarities between the Wright's actions and that of John Dickenson in trying to capitalise on their work without the justification of novelty. Although Dickenson tried to patent his Skiwing he failed to complete the process but still had the temerity to go after Mike Burns & Aerostructures with a solicitor's letter claiming breach of his 'patent'. The fact that the Aerostructures design pre-dated Dickenson's seems to have been missed by Henderson in his telling of the story.

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:55 am 
Offline
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4551
ARP has been studying challenges with the Wright Brothers and find some similarities to the topic of this thread.
Today ARP adds:

Quote:
Hi Joe,

The more I look through this site the more similarities I find with the Henderson/Dickenson saga:-


"A reader of Fred Howard in "Wilbur and Orville"*** needs to take note of his unacceptable insults and belittling of Edward Huffaker per the Wrights in chapter 8. In fact, they sound like those of a fishwife in a spiteful marriage. Huffaker was shiftless, unconscientous, and sloppy, they said. He spit tobacco and read with his feet on the desk. What's more, he never changed his shirt. Who cares? Does anyone know whether Newton chewed tobacco or Galileo changed his underwear? But many readers of this Wright "per-version" of history (some might call it) then, will tend to dismiss Huffaker, and many aviation pioneers other than the Wrights, because, as I can demonstrate, the Wrights verbally assassinated their competitors in one way or another, discredited them, their knowledge, and their contributions to aviation. They did it in a way that it sticks. It even crept into John David Anderson Jr.'s book. Sound bites.

Further, in his book "Wilbur and Orville,"*** Fred Howard, states on page 132 that Dr. Samuel Pierpont Langley's only contribution to aviation was the flights of his models in 1896. This is a complete contradiction of the facts. But it is the version of history that the Wrights wanted you to believe. (See previous post.) Like many/most Wright historians, Fred Howard didn't do his due diligence. He simply accepted the Wright statements, seriously neglecting his homework on the Wrights' fellow aviators, including Langley."

Same tactics of character assassination, discrediting, belittling the work of others, etc and the lack of due diligence by the FAI in awarding unjustified accolades.

It is as if history repeats itself every now and then driven by the darker side of human nature.

Regards,

Tony

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group