Personal Journals about Hang Gliding

Covi Virus spread was ORCHESTRATED

Postby eagle » Tue May 26, 2020 9:49 am

HERE IS THE SMOKING NUCLEAR BOMB PROVING THE PLANNED SCAMDEMIC
THAT OUR CIVIL SERVANTS / CONGRESS ORCHESTRATED ON U.S. ..
SHARE LIKE THERE IS NO TOMORROW

VIOLATORS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW 42 U.S.C.
See video: https://www.facebook.com/powderaddict/v ... 5198036573

Covi was a Plan.jpg
Covi was a Plan.jpg (172.14 KiB) Viewed 670 times
eagle
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:58 pm

Re: Virus spread

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Tue May 26, 2020 11:53 am

Thanks for the video Eagle. It's good to have an Eagle Eye on the lookout for corruption.

In this case, there is an alternative explanation to the conclusion in the video. There's a page on Wikipedia that gives the history of the "CARES" Act here:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CARES_Act

It starts off with this introduction:

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (H.R. 748), also known as the CARES Act, is a law meant to address the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. In its original form, it was introduced in the United States Congress as H.R. 748 (Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019) by Joe Courtney (D-CT) on January 24, 2019 although the bill was amended before it was passed.


Further down the page in the "Legislative history" section, it expands on that:

The House initially passed a tax cut bill in mid-2019 and sent it to the Senate, which then used it as a shell bill and added an amendment in the nature of a substitute, fulfilling the constitutional requirement that all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House. After the new bill was released by the Senate, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) issued a statement that read in part: "We are beginning to review Senator McConnell's proposal and on first reading, it is not at all pro-worker and instead puts corporations way ahead of workers." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) criticized the fact that Democrats were not involved by Republicans in drafting the bill.

You can find some of the original information from that bill in the congressional record:

      https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/748/history

From the Congressional Record, Volume 165 (2019)

H.R. 748 — A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on high cost employer-sponsored health coverage; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

By Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Ms. Titus), H1209 [24JA]

Cosponsors added, H1218 [25JA], H1244 [28JA], H1339 [30JA], H1343 [31JA], H1363 [5FE], H1464 [7FE], H1519 [11FE], H2035 [14FE], H2043 [19FE], H2047 [22FE], H2235 [26FE], H2273 [27FE], H2370 [5MR], H2587 [7MR], H2615 [8MR], H2648 [11MR], H2681 [12MR], H2719 [13MR], H2756 [18MR], H2797 [25MR], H2923 [29MR], H2987 [2AP], H3130 [8AP], H3220 [9AP], H3271 [15AP], H3304 [29AP], H3791 [14MY], H3843 [15MY], H3926 [16MY], H3963 [17MY], H4011 [20MY], H4065 [21MY], H4121 [22MY], H4167 [23MY], H4175 [28MY], H4217 [3JN], H4314 [4JN], H4349 [6JN], H4433 [11JN], H4629 [12JN], H4701 [14JN], H4772 [18JN], H4919 [19JN], H5038 [21JN], H5260 [27JN], H5304 [9JY], H5775 [12JY], H5826 [15JY], H5913 [16JY]

Debated, H5958 [17JY]

Text, H5958 [17JY]

Rules suspended. Passed House amended, H5980 [17JY]

Message from the House, S4944 [18JY]

Read the first time, S4944, S4955 [18JY]

Read the second time, S4957 [22JY]

Placed on the calendar, S4965 [22JY]

From the Congressional Record, Volume 166 (2020)

A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on high cost employer-sponsored health coverage; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

H.R. 748 — A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on high cost employer-sponsored health coverage; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

Motion to proceed considered, S1876 [20MR], S1895 [22MR], S1921 [23MR], S1976 [24MR], S2022 [25MR]

Amendments, S1915, S1916 [22MR], S1970, S1971, S1972 [23MR], S2015, S2019 [24MR], S2060, S2063 [25MR]

Debated, S2059 [25MR]

Motion to proceed withdrawn, S2059 [25MR]

Passed Senate amended, S2060 [25MR]

Message from the Senate, H1727 [26MR]

Debated, H1732 [27MR]

Consideration of Senate amendment, H1732 [27MR]

Amendments, H1732 [27MR]

House agreed to Senate amendment, H1864 [27MR]

Message from the House (received March 27, 2020), S2213 [4MY]

Examined and signed in the House, H1870 [31MR]

Examined and signed in the Senate (March 27, 2020), S2213 [4MY]

Approved [Public Law 116–136] (signed March 27, 2020)

As you can see in the congressional record, the original bill had no references to COVID-19.

I'm not an expert on how legislation works its way through Congress, but this explanation seems reasonable to me. I would say that Wolfi Valentino is either intentionally deceiving people or he didn't do his homework.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 6685
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Virus spread

Postby eagle » Tue May 26, 2020 4:39 pm

GOOD Catch Bob
Bob Kuczewski wrote:As you can see in the congressional record, the original bill had no references to COVID-19.

I'm not an expert on how legislation works its way through Congress, this explanation seems reasonable to m e. I would say that Wolfi Valentino is either intentionally deceiving people or he didn't do his homework.


My reply to Wolfi:

Our Research shows in congressional record, the original bill had no references to COVID-19.
We are not an expert on how legislation works its way through Congress, but unless you have further evidence, this explanation seems reasonable. I would say that someone is either intentionally deceiving people or he didn't do his homework. Deception is the New Normal

P.S. I still smell Fish
eagle
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:58 pm

Re: Virus spread

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Tue May 26, 2020 9:26 pm

eagle wrote:GOOD Catch Bob

No problem Ernie.    :wave:

Digging into the facts is my specialty.
That's why USHPA spit me out like I was salt on a slimy slug. :)

The USHPA Board of Director's meetings used to span 2 days. The first day was all committee meetings. All the committee chairmen and other USHPA insiders would show up with their often personal/business agendas and write them up as changes to USHPA's standard operating procedures. At the end of that first day there would be a big stack of changes waiting to be approved in the full Board meeting the next day. No one actually read them.

Instead of reading what they were going to vote on the next day, most of the Directors would spend the night partying, drinking, gambling, or some combination thereof. I don't know of a single other Director who took that stack of proposed changes back to their hotel room with a take out dinner to actually read what they were voting on the next day. I always did.

Most of the USHPA board members are good enough guys and gals. They love the sport and they like to be liked by their peers. They're exactly the kind of "go along to get along" folks who lead to things like the Salem Witch Trials and Nazi Germany. They're the same folks on your local school board and your local City Council. They're the easily manipulated sheople that dance at the ends of Mark Forbes' puppet strings. They rise to the call whenever a witch or a Jew needs burning ... as directed by their puppet masters of course. They despise anyone with competence and dedication because it makes them look bad when they gaze in the mirror. They're the ones who throw the stones when a stoning is needed ... while Mark Forbes and Tim Herr urge them on from behind in the shadows.

That's what I learned from my time on the USHPA Board of Directors.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 6685
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Virus spread

Postby eagle » Fri May 29, 2020 1:31 am

Bob Kuczewski wrote:No problem Ernie.   
Digging into the facts is my specialty.

Keep in mind that the document could have been in place and applied
to which ever Scamdemic hit.

There is a list of previous viruses in recent history, not there 1st Scamdemic
As the AGENDA document was set in place and ready
You could follow it to the day it was used...

Just like Torrey Pines Gliderport "PARA Virus" Takeover
The racketeering extortion operation was started years ago.
You could follow it up to today's current extortion ...
It was planed and executed, driving the market to bare
Stealing Americas recreational freedom as well.

PARA VIRUS.png
PARA VIRUS.png (724.96 KiB) Viewed 632 times
eagle
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:58 pm

Previous
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Options

Return to Blog Forum