Personal Journals about Hang Gliding

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby Rick Masters » Thu Jun 04, 2015 3:45 pm

Three critical books on the subject of malignant narcissism, for those who want to know.
These are the entire books on pdf. Perhaps they will remind you of people you know.

Image
MacKay, Charles, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds
http://www.cmi-gold-silver.com/pdf/mackaych2451824518-8.pdf

Image
Vaknin, Sam, Malignant Self Love
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/narcissistleader.pdf
Sam Vaknikn videos on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/samvaknin/videos
Documentary film, I, Psychopath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKvhKI6Kxew


Lobaczewski, Andrew, Political Ponerology
http://www.serendipity.li/bush/ponerology_preview.pdf

Unfortunately, none of this is off-topic.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:22 pm

I didn't have time to read everything, but I stumbled on the TULIPOMANIA story in the Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions. The "house of cards" theme is one that repeats many times in human history. But the best part was the story of the unfortunate sailor mistook a rare tulip bulb for an onion and ate a fortune's worth in a quick meal:

"The most unfortunate part of the business for him was, that he remained in prison for some months on a charge of felony preferred against him by the merchant."


Thanks Rick, and thanks to Project Gutenburg!!
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8488
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby Rick Masters » Fri Jun 05, 2015 11:08 am

Try to find time for the second half of the YouTube audio. There is something there for you (and all the rest of us).
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby SamKellner » Fri Jun 05, 2015 11:31 am

Hi Rick,

Did you see this yet? Looks like an example of PDMC. :roll:

https://vimeo.com/129857880
Southwest Texas Hang Gliders
US Hawks Hang Gliding Assn.
Chapter #4
SamKellner
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:15 pm
Location: SW Texas

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby Rick Masters » Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:13 pm

Image

PDMC. Without question. https://vimeo.com/129857880

Notice at the very beginning, how he comes into the frame upside down with his deadly soaring parachute underneath him. That's not an aircraft.

Image

Was that little yellow, uninflated thing his reserve parachute? That's what a reserve parachute looks like inside the Paragliding Dead Man's Curve.

Image

He might as well have been carrying this in his reserve container.

Image

The u$hPa Insurance Chairman said:
Sure looks to me like he stalled it. That's what a stall looks like, and he recovers into a parachutal stall with ears pulled. It's hard to tell from the angle where we see the incident start, but it sure looks to me like he's flying slowly in turbulent air, fairly deep in the brakes. That's what you don't do, if you want to avoid this.

He appears to hit a thermal surge and the wing rocks back. What he *should* have done was to go to minimum brake and apply a bit of speed bar to "pull in" for speed. Instead, it appears that the wing starts to recover and as it gets overhead he over-brakes it trying to stop a forward surge, and stalls it. The wing drops back, the pilot swings underneath and the wing recovers. Why it recovered into a parachutal stall with the ears pulled in I'm not sure, but he could have exited the stall by letting up on the brakes and giving the speed bar a quick jab to get it flying again.

Don't fly near stall in turbulent air and thermals while near the ground.

____________

We have one thousand sixteen dead helpless falling humans on paragliders for a reason. It doesn't look like he's figured it out, yet.

"That's what a stall looks like." Ha, ha!

My hang glider always went up in thermals.
I never "stalled" it like that. Stalling is something a skilled hang glider pilot has to do on purpose.
And I never flew a hang glider that didn't have a gentle, easily-recoverable stall.
Nothing like that crap-shoot willie-make-it? death ride those lemmings accept as recreational flying.

Paragliders aren't really "stalling" when they encounter turbulence.
The canopy is losing its airfoil shape.
It then becomes a non-aerodynamic object and falls out of the sky.

That is not a stall.

That is a result of a stupid decision to fly something very dangerous.

Don't make up aerodynamic explanations for it.
People who actually understand aerodynamics will laugh at you.
I stepped away from freeflight for 15 years. When I came back, I saw that paragliders had re-written the language. It was ugly. It didn't make sense. They'd turned everything around to attempt to put lipstick on their miserable bags. When I finally understood, the hairs on the back of my neck stood up on end. It was suicidal mania.

Any hang glider pilot should run, not walk, away from the u$hPa.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby SamKellner » Fri Jun 05, 2015 7:08 pm

After the Dockweiler/Otto fly-in we came home via San Diego and visited Torrey as a spectator with my grandson.

That day conditions were minimal. There were three tandem rides being conducted at the same time and all three were about on the red line of your illustration.

The one we saw land popped up just enough to land in front of/on the RC mound.

The passenger was a ~12yr old girl.
Southwest Texas Hang Gliders
US Hawks Hang Gliding Assn.
Chapter #4
SamKellner
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:15 pm
Location: SW Texas

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby JoeF » Fri Jun 05, 2015 8:59 pm

Thanks, Sam. Some view of the Pacific Ocan, huh? :thumbup:
============================
on the red line of your illustration.

They were at less that the red line upon launching and upon landing. :crazy:
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4677
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby wingspan33 » Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:31 pm

SamKellner wrote:After the Dockweiler/Otto fly-in we came home via San Diego and visited Torrey as a spectator with my grandson.

That day conditions were minimal. There were three tandem rides being conducted at the same time and all three were about on the red line of your illustration.

The one we saw land popped up just enough to land in front of/on the RC mound.

The passenger was a ~12yr old girl.


Read the u$hPa's waiver*, [ www.ushpa.aero/forms/Info_USHPA_Release_Waiver.pdf ]

then read the following California statute -

The State of California wrote:CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 273a.

(b) Any person who, . . . having the care or custody of any child, . . . willfully causes or permits that child to be
placed in a situation where his or her person or health may be endangered, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
[emph. add.]






* Which this and any other 12 year old's parents must read and sign before such child can be taken on a HG or PG tandem joy ride.
wingspan33
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:24 pm

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Jun 06, 2015 12:07 am

wingspan33 wrote:Read the u$hPa's waiver ...

then read the following California statute ...


And if that's not enough ...

     ... then read the FAA Tandem Exemption.          :roll:
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8488
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders

Postby wingspan33 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:27 am

Bob,

The trouble with the FAA's Tandem Exemption is that it is worded so broadly and vaguely. As such, u$hPa "tandem rated instructors" can give commercial "joy rides" by simply issuing a u$hpa 30 day "student" membership, then say no more than a couple things about how the glider (H or P) is controlled during a tandem flight and they have met the FAA's definition of what is allowed.

The truth is that a u$hpa 30 day student membership can be (and are) handed out to any ignorant member of the public (or to a child by way of their parent or guardian) who has the $ to pay the fee involved. The u$hPa Certified and rated Tandem Instructor can be drunk, stoned (or not) and fly in an unsafe manor (or not). And very often, the "tandem lesson" is done for no other reason than the clear and sole (?) purpose of generating $$$ for the tandem pilot and/or his or her employer.

The FAA grants the tandem exemption so that rated u$hPa pilots can learn more about the sport - which, ideally, helps keep the sport safer. And giving tandem based lessons to newer pilots also promotes safety for those early beginning pilots. In so doing, the naive, uninitiated "public" is also "protected" from unscrupulous joy ride salesmen.

But that's in the "ideal" world. In reality, thrill seekers BASE jump out of tandem gliders, daughters watch their fathers fall from tandem gliders, an 11 year old boy and his instructor are killed in a tandem glider, the safety of more than one 10-12 year old is threatened by tandem pilots pulling dangerous stunts during tandem "lessons". All for the sake of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
wingspan33
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:24 pm

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Options

Return to Blog Forum