Personal Journals about Hang Gliding

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:28 pm

JoeF wrote:Unfortunate political forces have moved to "silence" various views. Sad.

All views deserve a respectful hearing.
Protect the rights of each participant.
Silencing has no place in our community.


Off the top of my head:

  1. hanggliding.org
  2. ozreport.com
  3. crestlinesoaring.org
  4. paraglidingforum.com
  5. flyfunston.org
  6. hgaa.org
  7. USHPA

Actually, silencing seems to have a fairly well established place in our community.    :(
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8129
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:25 am

Sunday, August 21, 2016
Image
At 9 a.m. on Sunday morning, some idiot in a powered paraglider got into a spiral dive over a Mormon chapel in Draper, Utah and crashed through the roof and into the attic, killing himself.

Image
The small hole near the church spire attests to the high rate of vertical speed.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/21/paraglider-dies-after-crashing-into-roof-utah-church.html

Talk about third-party liability. The chapel was then evacuated and closed. Call me insensitive but this is outrageous. Other than during landing or take off, it is against the law to fly below 1000 feet in GA aircraft over congested areas.

FAR §91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General.
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=3efaad1b0a259d4e48f1150a34d1aa77&rgn=div5&view=text&node=14:2.0.1.3.10&idno=14#se14.2.91_1119

Powered paragliders, because of the Universal Paragliding Design Flaw (UPDF),* should not be allowed over populated areas at all. Paragliding incidents often seem to reflect negatively on the mature sport of hang gliding in some way. But now that all USHPA hang glider pilots have joined themselves by the hip to paragliding, which is inherently more irresponsible, dangerous and careless, expect blowback. Bad press. Increased insurance claims. Site loss. Poor morale. A really serious liability incident is just a matter of time. This one came close. Watch hang gliders get banned along with paragliders.

People will say "There goes Rick Masters being insensitive again," but what about the blatant insensitivity of people who are incapable of imagining anything going wrong, flying "aircraft" with known, obvious and glaring control and design flaws over populated areas? No one in our sport ever addresses this. Hey, it traumatizes normal people to have fools fall out of the sky and slaughter themselves in front of families and children. Now at a church service? For God's sake, people. Enough!

Image
SAFETY NOTICE
Issued by Angus Pinkerton - Chairman of the Flying & Safety Committee 21 November 2008.
All paraglider pilots, Instructors, Coaches and Safety Officers must READ, DIGEST AND TAKE ACTION on the contents of this Notice and keep it for future reference.
If you hold a copy of the BHPA Technical Manual this notice must be inserted into it and retained until it is withdrawn or superseded on instructions from the Chairman FSC.

PARAGLIDERS: 360 DEGREE TURNS AND NOSE-DOWN SPIRAL DIVES

Following some recently reported incidents prompting further investigation, it has become apparent that it is possible for pilots to unintentionally enter a nose-down spiral dive from a sustained 360 degree turn – and that recovery from this spiral can be difficult. These characteristics tend to be worse on the ‘safer’ low aspect ratio EN A, B, LTF (DHV) 1 and 1 / 2 wings.
Once in a nose-down spiral dive extremely high rates of descent – 14 to 27 m/s (approximately 30 to 60 mph straight down) may be reached, along with forces of 3g to 4g and airspeeds of up to 100km/h. Clearly any pilot inadvertently entering a nose-down spiral will find all of the above extremely disorientating. Whereas in most situations a low aspect ratio wing (EN A, B, LTF (DHV) 1, 1 / 2 ) will ‘self-recover’ if the pilot lets up on the controls, this is not the case in a nose-down spiral.
Reaching and activating an Emergency Parachute may also be difficult whilst subject to high ‘g’ forces.

360 turn / Spiral dive mechanism:
If a 360 degree turn is continued for a revolution or two, without the airspeed and bank angle being controlled, then the pilot will tend to swing out. The situation can then accelerate rapidly. The effective pilot weight increases as centrifugal force increases, which increases the wing loading, which increases the airspeed, which increases the centrifugal force etc..
And as the pilot swings out, the pitch/roll/yaw axis of the paraglider tilts, with the result that the yaw resulting from holding on inside brake now brings the nose further down, whilst the secondary effect (roll) keeps the glider rotating on the downward vertical corkscrew path....
---------------------
If I were an insurance company, you know what I'd do? I'd take one look at this irresponsible crap coming out of paragliding, hang gliding and powered variants and I'd jack the price of 3PL up so high that nobody would be able to afford it. They have to scuttle off and form their own laughable RRG.
Oh...
They did...
Really?
Then what happened?

*Universal Paragliding Design Flaw (UPDF): Paragliders are parachutes modified to soar at the expense of stability and safety. The canopy of a paraglider can suddenly lose its aerodynamic shape in normal atmospheric turbulence, collapse and fall. A 360-degree turn can tighten into a locked-in or nose-down spiral dive where control cannot be regained. A collapse below about 400-feet does not allow enough time for emergency reserve deployment, often resulting in serious injury or death -- see the Paraglider Dead Man's Curve (PDMC). Because these incidents have been occurring for 30 years with over 1,700 deaths in both powered and unpowered paragliders worldwide and show no signs of decreasing, on August 22, 2016, Rick Masters has placed the term "Universal Paragliding Design Flaw (UPDF)" into the lexicon of paragliding.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:18 pm

A really serious liability incident is just a matter of time. This one came close. Watch hang gliders get banned along with paragliders.


Bei einem Unfall mit einem Tandemparagleitschirm sind im Bezirk Villach am Donnerstagnachmittag zwei Kinder schwer verletzt worden. Laut Kärntner Polizei war ein 44-Jähriger aus Salzburg mit dem Schirm vom Startplatz des Gerlitzengipfels losgeflogen. Die beiden Kinder im Alter (4 und 10) hatte er dabei. Nach kurzer Zeit geriet er mit dem Schirm in Turbulenzen und stürzte aus etwa zehn Meter ab. http://www.salzburg24.at/zwei-kinder-bei-unfall-mit-tandemparagleiter-schwer-verletzt-2/4867068

Today, a horrible paragliding accident occurred involving children.
A soaring parachutist launched from Gerlitzengipfels in Austria with his two little kids, a little girl aged four and a little boy, aged ten.
He climbed to 30 feet but he hadn't checked his equipment to see if it was hooked up properly.
It wasn't. Out of balance, the paraglider turned back into the hill and crashed.
He was uninjured but the children were "seriously injured" and evacuated by helicopter.
He is in trouble with the Austrian authorities. No tandem license.

Image
I've had it with all these little kids getting hurt or killed.
Children should be protected but there is a real cavalier attitude about putting children in danger by A LOT of freefliers.
I don't want to be associated with an activity that causes that, over and over.
Neither do insurers. (How's that insurance thing working out, by the way?)

Image

Image



Image

Image

On the other hand, this is okay:
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:04 am

Image
The police investigation of the estranged father who crashed a paraglider with his two children has revealed that he had neglected to inform their mother of his plans for the day!
This guy is in deep doo-doo.
The fines, loss of flying license, possible jail time, helicopter rescue and medical expenses all pale in comparison.
Don't go home, dude.
Marriage is the most dangerous sport of all!

Image
You have been warned.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Sat Aug 27, 2016 4:51 pm

Scorched Earth
A PG joyriding "company" builds a launch site in a national forest - and gets caught after bragging about it.

Image

Image

Image
Soaring parachutists caught chain-sawing down an exquisitely beautiful tree on scenic mountainside.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
A tarp was then spread across the previously lovely spot so they could launch their paragliders.

Image
When these photos were discovered on a forum, members of the public became outraged.

"Many Thais are indignant and wondering why a group of foreigners can just simply destroy nature on the popular holiday island of Phangan for fun and go unpunished."

Selected responses from forums:

"Surely this deserves a prison term."
"Such a beautiful tree...."
"This is a matter of public consciousness. They should fear subsequent arrest - fine, punishment. And, if possible, their visas should be suspended."
"There is a deep need to know why anyone would even think of doing something like this!"
"Detectives followed them and caught them."
"It was wrong."
"They did it openly in mocking contempt of Thai law. It was a big slap in the face to the police and to Thailand."
"I hate the foreigners who come to our country."
"I hope that the authorities have seen this!"
"It was a natural bonsai..."
"Evil foreigners did it. The National Forest is a national treasure."
"The tree is located in the National Forest is not his land. He had no right to use that area in order to operate his parachute trade."
"Why would you do something stupid like this by cutting a tree and destroying a beautiful natural place? Who do you think you are to come into Thailand and take the liberty of destroying our natural resources? We welcome all you foreigners to this country to live, make money, or enjoy the beauty of our country, but we do not expect you to destroy our country. You guys should go to jail for that! Bastards!"
"The guilty must be punished!"
"They should be punished."
"He should be arrested."
"Dreadful!"
"They act without culture, these dirty s**ts, insulting Thailand, destroying the natural treasures of precious of Thailand. Many Thai people like and appreciate well behaved and good mannered Tourists and expats. However, we Thai DO NOT like and DO NOT Want scumbag tourists and expats who think they can do whatever crap they want here for their own pleasure. We want to stick that tree in your dumb arse!"
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:37 am

When Collado Alvaro Perez, 40, of Celis, Spain died at Mt. Brevent, Haute-Savoie on August 25, 2016, police at the scene determined that Perez had been flying in "strong thermals" when his canopy "closed asymmetrically before plummetting, probably because of the violence of these currents." Perez was the one thousand, five hundredth person to die on a paraglider that I have recorded. At least eight more paragliding deaths have followed in the two weeks since his accident.
    So I will make a prediction. The sport of paragliding is making the cost of free flight rescues and corpse recoveries unacceptably high in many countries. Soon, I expect, freeflight - both paragliding and hang gliding - will be banned in the height of summer when temperatures are at their highest.
    This has actually already begun to happen. Austria has limited the numbers of foreign paraglider pilots following years of rescuing or recovering dead Germans and the majority of the airspace around Mt. Blanc has been closed to hang gliding and paragliding for two years now by Italy and France during the summer due to too many paragliders in the air interfering with helicopter rescues of crashed paragliders.
    The experiment of joining soaring parachuting and hang gliding under one organization in so many countries is delivering no advantage for the sport of hang gliding and threatens its future. Hang gliding needs to distance itself from parachuting and continually emphasize to the authorities that hang gliders are designed to survive turbulence much more capably than paragliders.
    A disturbing associated trend of this bad marriage is the apparent decrease in competence in flying ability of hang glider pilots. I attribute this to an emphasis of paragliding over hang gliding, in both oversight and training, in virtually every national freeflight organization.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:37 am

September 17, 2016
Image
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:39 am

September 22, 2016
In response to several joyriding deaths on paragliders and increasing use of paramotors on the beach, a bill was brought to the floor of the municipal council of Praia Grande, Brazil, on the coast of Sao Paulo, banning hang gliding in the city and closing all the popular launches using beach landings and the beaches themselves to free-flyers.
    Drivers of cars transporting hang gliding equipment in prohibited areas would be fined US$1,550 for the first offense, US$3,100 for the second offense and US$6,200 for the third offense.
    Pilots caught with their equipment would also be fined US$1,550 for the first offense, US$3,100 for the second offense and US$6,200 for the third offense.
    Any pilot causing injury to another person would be fined US$6,200.
    Any pilot responsible for the death of another would be fined US$9,300.
    Additionally, "the sanctions do not exempt the offender from civil and criminal liability for the crimes committed."
    The bill was voted down in session but rescheduled for further consideration.

The bill's sponsor, Councilman Antonio Eduardo Serrano, said, "The initiative is to safeguard lives. The edge of the beach is not a suitable place for takeoffs and landings. In free flight these are devices with motors and propellers, and any failure in the air, mechanical or human, causes a great risk to those on earth. This is a measure that Praia Grande takes to safeguard the lives of swimmers and all who frequent the beach and live in our city."

    The beaches in Praia Grande have been used by hang glider pilots for 40 years.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby Rick Masters » Wed Sep 28, 2016 7:04 am



    A posted video of a paraglider launching off the Dundas Peak and flying over houses and roads last week is worrisome enough for the Conservation Authority to seek legal advice, and for Transport Canada to investigate.
    "All paragliders are expected to fly safely and legally," Transport Canada spokesperson Natasha Gauthier said.
    "Transport Canada will look into this situation and will take appropriate action if noncompliance with the rules is found."
    She said Canadian Aviation Regulations outline the requirements for hang-gliding and paragliding activities in Canada.
    The paraglider was recorded on Sept. 21 taking off from the peak and flying over trees, several streets and beside a condo building, before landing at Fisher's Mill Park.
    The video got the attention of Hamilton Conservation Authority (HCA) and Transport Canada after it was sent to them by The Hamilton Spectator for comment. The video was also sent to the city, police, and Horizon Utilities.
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6881340-video-paraglider-s-flight-off-dundas-peak-triggers-investigation/
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Losing airspace to hang gliding because of paragliding

Postby the dude » Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:35 pm

Bob Kuczewski wrote:
JoeF wrote:Unfortunate political forces have moved to "silence" various views. Sad.

All views deserve a respectful hearing.
Protect the rights of each participant.
Silencing has no place in our community.


Actually, silencing seems to have a fairly well established place in our community.    :(


It even occurs here in HawkLand, I have a friend that was banned from this website, without posting even once. Just ask your fearless leader, who that might be. :shock: :shh: :wtf:
the dude
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:39 pm

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Options

Return to Blog Forum

cron