Page 1 of 2

The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:15 pm
by Rick Masters
This blog is for the purpose of illustrating what can happen. All are invited to contribute or comment.
Therapeutic relief may be obtained by smacking one's forehead hard with an open hand again and again.

Image
Former Insurance Company Chief Indicted
Thursday, July 3, 2014

    Jeffrey Cohen, founder and former president of Indemnity Insurance Company RRG, is indicted in Maryland on five counts of making false statements to insurance regulators.
    Jeffrey Cohen, 39, of Reistertown, Maryland, was indicted last week by a grand jury in Baltimore County, Maryland on five counts of making false statements during an investigation into his company, Indemnity Insurance Corporation RRG.
    Cohen acted as the President and CEO of the Maryland-based risk and retention group until late last year. According to the indictment, as recently as 2012, IICRRG provided general liability, liquor liability and excess liability coverage to more than 3,000 nightclubs, restaurants and concert tours around the country.
    He faces a maximum of 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
    Indemnity Insurance Corporation was forced into liquidation following an investigation by the Delaware Insurance Commission.
    The indictment alleges that in June 2012, regulators from the Delaware Insurance Commissioner questioned the financial status of the company.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland, Cohen allegedly caused IICRRG to file an unaudited financial statement in November 2012 and January 2013, and sent a letter to, the Commissioner, respectively, which falsely claimed that IICRRG had $5.1 million in cash on deposit, in order to influence the actions of the commissioner.
    In April 2013, Cohen caused a fax to be submitted to the Commissioner that falsely claimed that a bank had verified that IICRRG had $5.1 million in cash on deposit at the bank.
    The liquidation of the company is impacting hundreds of establishments in and around Connecticut.
    As of April, at least 68 bars in Connecticut with pending liability cases against them, found out they no longer are insured. Meaning they are now forced to find representation and pay any losing claims out of their own pockets.
    Records show more than 120 bars and restaurants with pending liability cases in New York are also left without insurance.
    A NBC Connecticut Troubleshooters investigation in June found that bar owners are scrambling to find insurance in the aftermath. With many saying that if they do lose these pending cases, their only option would be to close down...
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/troubleshooters/Former-Insurance-Company-Chief-Indicted-265778601.html

Image
FBI Baltimore Division
Jeffrey Cohen Charged in Superseding Indictment with Wire Fraud, Money Laundering, and Making False Statements to Fraudulently Obtain More Than $100 Million in Insurance Premiums
Allegedly Created and Transmitted False Documents and Made False Statements
U.S. Attorney’s Office
September 17, 2014

District of Maryland
(410) 209-4800

BALTIMORE, MD—A federal grand jury has returned a superseding indictment charging Jeffrey Brian Cohen, age 39, of Reisterstown, Maryland, with wire fraud and money laundering in addition to the charges of making false statements to an insurance regulator that were included in the original indictment. The superseding indictment was returned on September 16, 2014.

The superseding indictment was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Special Agent in Charge Stephen E. Vogt of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Special Agent in Charge William Winter of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI); Special Agent in Charge Thomas J. Kelly of the Internal Revenue Service—Criminal Investigation, Washington, D.C. Field Office; and Postal Inspector in Charge Gary R. Barksdale of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service—Washington Division.

According to the superseding indictment, Cohen acted as the president and chairman of the board of a Delaware corporation Indemnity Insurance Corporation RRG (Indemnity). Cohen previously controlled a District of Columbia corporation called Indemnity Insurance Corporation of DC, Risk Retention Group (Indemnity-DC), which was a predecessor entity to Indemnity. Both companies were located in Sparks, Maryland, and provided general liability insurance, liquor liability insurance, and excess liability insurance coverage to their customers, which were individuals and companies involved in the entertainment industry, such as nightclubs, concert tours, and special events. Both companies operated in several states, including Maryland. In 2012, Indemnity insured more than 3,000 policyholders, and collected over $25 million in premiums.

The Delaware Insurance Commissioner and the DC Insurance Commissioner were charged by law with the responsibility of protecting insurance policyholders and the general public by regulating insurance companies and risk retention groups and their products to ensure among other things, that insurance companies and risk retention groups have the ability to pay claims.

According to the 12-count superseding indictment, Cohen obtained and attempted to obtain money from insurance policyholders and potential insurance policyholders of Indemnity-DC and Indemnity based on financial ratings, financial audits, and insurance regulatory approvals that Cohen fraudulently obtained. The indictment alleges that beginning in January 2008, and continuing until the fall of 2013, Cohen defrauded insurance policyholders and prospective insurance policyholders in order to obtain more than $100 million in insurance premiums, by falsely representing the financial status of Indemnity-DC, Indemnity, and other Cohen controlled entities to insurance policyholders, prospective insurance policyholders, the rating agency A.M. Best, to independent auditors, the DC Insurance Commissioner, and the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.

Specifically, the superseding indictment alleges that Cohen created false financial documents, including bank statements, letters of credit, and confirmations of bank account balances. These documents allegedly included a bank confirmation from a fictitious entity called RBCI, purportedly showing that Indemnity-DC had a bank account with a balance of $10 million as of December 31, 2009, and a bank confirmation dated March 1, 2013, purportedly from RBC Government Demands, showing that Indemnity’s bank account ending in 6652 had a balance of $5,097,276. According to the indictment, Cohen transmitted these false documents to A.M. Best in order to obtain financial ratings for Indemnity-DC and Indemnity that were not based on the companies’ true financial condition. Cohen then allegedly touted the A.M. Best ratings to potential policyholders, policyholders, and regulatory agencies. Cohen also allegedly transmitted false and fraudulent e-mails, management representation letters, financial statements, and other documents to the auditing firms Marcum and BDO so the auditors would provide an unqualified audit opinion on Indemnity-DC and Indemnity financial statements that Cohen knew were false.

According to the superseding indictment, Cohen caused Indemnity-DC and Indemnity to issue insurance policies exceeding the coverage limits authorized by the DC Insurance Commissioner and the Delaware Insurance Commissioner. To conceal the true financial condition of the companies, Cohen allegedly transmitted fraudulent audited and unaudited financial statements for Indemnity-DC and Indemnity to the DC Insurance Commissioner and the Delaware Insurance Commissioner. Cohen also allegedly made false statements to representatives of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner in June 2012.

According to the indictment, Cohen also conducted financial transactions with the proceeds of the scheme. Specifically the indictment alleges that Cohen transferred $666,667.67 from a corporate account he controlled to an account in the name of a law firm, and Cohen transferred $200,000 from a corporate account he controlled to one of his personal accounts.

The indictment seeks forfeiture of $100,866,667.67, believed to be the proceeds of the scheme.

Cohen faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for each of five counts of wire fraud, 10 years in prison for each of two counts of money laundering, and 15 years in prison for each of five counts of making false statements to an insurance regulator. No court appearance has been scheduled and Cohen remains detained.

An indictment is not a finding of guilt. An individual charged by indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty at some later criminal proceedings.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein praised the FBI, HSI Baltimore, IRS—Criminal Investigation and U.S. Postal Inspection Service—Washington Division for their work in the investigation. Mr. Rosenstein thanked Assistant United States Attorneys Harry M. Gruber and Joyce K. McDonald, who are prosecuting the case.

This content has been reproduced from its original source.
https://www.fbi.gov/baltimore/press-releases/2014/jeffrey-cohen-charged-in-superseding-indictment-with-wire-fraud-money-laundering-and-making-false-statements-to-fraudulently-obtain-more-than-100-million-in-insurance-premiums

Image
Maryland insurance executive pleads guilty in insurance fraud scheme
June 16, 2015

    After four days of trial, Jeffrey Brian Cohen, 39, of Reisterstown, Md., pled guilty on June 5 to wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, making false statements to an insurance regulator, and obstruction of justice.

    Rod J. Rosenstein, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, announced the guilty plea, stating, “Jeffrey Cohen carried out a massive fraud scheme for which he finally will be held accountable.”

    ...Cohen admitted that he obtained and attempted to obtain money from insurance policyholders and potential insurance policyholders of Indemnity-DC and Indemnity based on financial ratings, financial audits and insurance regulatory approvals that he fraudulently obtained.

Beginning in January 2008, and continuing until the fall of 2013, Cohen defrauded insurance policyholders and prospective insurance policyholders in order to obtain more than $100 million in insurance premiums, by falsely representing the financial status of Indemnity-DC, Indemnity and other Cohen controlled entities to insurance policyholders, prospective insurance policyholders, the rating agency A.M. Best, to independent auditors, the D.C. Insurance Commissioner and the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.

False information for ratings

According to Rosenstein’s statement, Cohen created false financial documents, including bank statements, letters of credit, and confirmations of bank account balances. Cohen transmitted some of these false documents to A.M. Best in order to obtain financial ratings for Indemnity-DC and Indemnity that were not based on the companies’ true financial condition. Cohen then touted the A.M. Best ratings to current and potential policyholders and regulatory agencies. Cohen also transmitted false and fraudulent emails, management representation letters, financial statements, and other documents to the auditing firms Marcum and BDO so the auditors would provide an unqualified audit opinion on Indemnity-DC and Indemnity financial statements that Cohen knew were false. Cohen used the name and identity of a bank official to create a false bank confirmation.

To conceal the true financial condition of the companies, according to the plea agreement, Cohen transmitted fraudulent audited and unaudited financial statements for Indemnity-DC and Indemnity to the D.C. Insurance Commissioner and the Delaware Insurance Commissioner. Cohen also made false statements to representatives of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner in June 2012.

The Delaware Insurance Commissioner began civil proceedings against the Cohen companies in June 2013. In October 2013, two attorneys referred Cohen’s criminal offenses, including the false statements to an insurance regulator offense to which he pled guilty, to federal authorities. On February 20, 2014, Rosenstein said in a statement, Cohen threated one of the attorneys who had referred his case in an effort to prevent the attorney from communicating with federal law enforcement concerning the crimes Cohen committed in the operation of his insurance companies.

Cohen faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for each of the wire fraud and obstruction of justice counts, 15 years in prison for making false statements to an insurance regulator, and a mandatory two years, consecutive to any other sentence, for aggravated identity theft. Cohen remains detained until his sentencing on Aug. 6, 2015.
http://www.propertycasualty360.com/2015/06/16/maryland-insurance-executive-pleads-guilty-in-insu?page_all=1

Image

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 7:52 pm
by Rick Masters
Image
Some regulators were concerned that RRGs were being chartered primarily for purposes other than self-insurance, such as making a profit for someone other than the collective insureds. Further, LRRA does not recognize that separate companies typically manage RRGs. Yet, past RRG failures suggest that sometimes management companies have promoted their own interests at the expense of the insureds. Although LRRA does not address governance issues such as conflicts of interest between management companies and insureds, Congress previously has enacted safeguards to address similar issues in the mutual fund industry. Finally, some of these RRG failures have resulted in thousands of insureds and their claimants losing coverage, some of whom may not have been fully aware that their RRG lacked state insurance insolvency guaranty fund coverage or the consequences of lacking such coverage.
GAO-05-536 Risk Retention Groups http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05536.pdf

Image

A longstanding USHPA member writes:

        Rick,
        These people running USHPA are out of their minds. They openly talk about Commercial operations when Part 103 specifically states that
        it is for “recreation or sport purposes only”. There is nothing like putting the noose around your neck and hanging yourself with the FAA.
        If paragliders weren’t bad enough, now they are hooking themselves up with Kite Boarding (PASA).
        These people have lost their minds.

        Image

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:58 am
by Bob Kuczewski
RickMasters wrote:
Yet, past RRG failures suggest that sometimes management companies have promoted their own interests at the expense of the insureds. Although LRRA does not address governance issues such as conflicts of interest between management companies and insureds, Congress previously has enacted safeguards to address similar issues in the mutual fund industry. Finally, some of these RRG failures have resulted in thousands of insureds and their claimants losing coverage, some of whom may not have been fully aware that their RRG lacked state insurance insolvency guaranty fund coverage or the consequences of lacking such coverage.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 3:17 pm
by Bill Cummings
Congress previously has enacted safeguards to address similar issues in the mutual fund industry.

mutual fund industry

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:01 pm
by JoeF

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:51 pm
by Rick Masters
This won't help.
But now that hang gliding is part of paragliding in every association, it doesn't matter.
No one can say "it wasn't me" because its us.
Well, that is, it's you - you mutant association members.

07/18/2014 - 09:40
Bansin (ots) - As previously reported, it was on the beach of Bansin on Thursday, 18:40 to a serious accident. A resident in Poland Maszewo West Pomeranian Province 41-year-old man collided with his paraglider in landing with tourists.In the course of investigations so far that it is the scene of an accident is a stretch of beach of the seaside resort Bansin which is located not far from a 50 m high escarpment. The paraglider started there obviously and moved according to witnesses nearly an hour in the air. It is unclear yet whether the paraglider came down because of winds or wanted to land there. ... When landing the glider came with his feet forward onto a beach tent. A 71-year-old holidaymaker from Brandenburg district was seriously injured. A 10-year-old grandson a slight head injury. The Senior was flown to the clinic of the University Hospital Greifswald, where the doctors found two fractured ribs and admitted her into the ICU. ... The emergency services of paramedics and firefighters [found] the three, four and ten year old grandson clearly in shock. Police are investigating on suspicion of negligent injury.
http://www.presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/110970/3001287

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:59 pm
by Rick Masters

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:50 am
by Rick Masters
April 6, 2016
A paragliding instructor has been indicted for manslaughter this morning by an Austrian court in the death of a German student. The woman, in training, had launched her paraglider without having fastened her leg straps. The instructor, who plead not guilty, claimed that he saw this during her take off run and yelled for her to stop. She did not respond and lifted off, hanging by her brake handles for five minutes before falling to her death.

Exposing the Truth

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:24 am
by eagle
Torrey Pines Gliderport Legal Fiasco ~ Who's at Fault
We Have Corrupted City Leaders, which includes the Local Police, The USHPA and Gliderport Management
that have allowed this to happen in the 1st place...

~ So WHO & HOW will it be Fixed ~

What Rights.jpg
What Rights.jpg (13.53 KiB) Viewed 9907 times

Re: The RRG What-Me-Worry? Caveat Emptor Funnies

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:50 am
by Rick Masters
Advertisement - They did not mention hang gliding.
Why?
Hang gliders don't fail.
http://www.rosenfeldinjurylawyers.com/parachute-failures-and-paraglide-accidents.html

> Practice Areas > Other Personal Injury > Parachute Failures and Paraglide Accidents
Parachute Failures and Paraglide Accidents

Parachute Failings and What Happens
Attorneys For Parachute and Paraglide Accidents
Skydivers and paragliders are inherently exposed to serious injury or death associated with extreme aerial sports. When a parachute fails or a paraglider malfunctions, the results of the accident can be catastrophic. When trained professionals conduct the activity and an accident occurs, human error is often the cause. Many parachute failures and paraglide accidents are the result of negligence or insufficient risk management. Other aerial sport accidents are caused by equipment failure or improperly packed parachutes.

Skydiving has been a popular extreme sport for decades involving daredevils and sports enthusiasts alike. Many resort visitors enjoy parasailing when an individual attached to an open parachute is pulled behind a moving vehicle or boat. In recent years, paragliding has also become both a competitive and recreational sport. The paragliding pilot rests comfortably in a harness suspended underneath a large fabric wing with full control of aerodynamic forces that allow the glider to keep the individual in the air.

Unfortunately rented parachutes available at skydiving schools and parasailing equipment at resorts are used repeatedly year-round. The equipment can easily become worn by constant exposure to damaging sunrays, saltwater, pressure and stress. Other times, because of lack of adequate training, the victim might be injured by making harsh contact on a beach, roadway or in the water.

Significance of ‘Waivers’ in Parachute and Paraglide Crash Mishaps
Typically, skydivers and paragliders using equipment or following instruction of others must sign a skydiving waiver before participating in the activity. These release and indemnity agreements attempt to limit negligence liability of the operator and other employees. By law, these waivers must be specific and clear in detailing the inherent risks and dangers involved in the activity.

If the skydiver or paraglider is injured because of an accident or malfunction, seeking compensation after signing a waiver can be challenging. Because of that, many injured victims will hire a skilled personal injury attorney who specializes in aerial sports accidents. The lawyer may be able to prove that a defective product or negligence of others caused the victim’s injuries.

Common Parachute Injuries
Overall, the number of serious injuries involved in aerial sports nearly equals minor ones. An injury can occur from an improper jump or landing, windy conditions, landing on rough terrain, and improper parachute handling.

When a paraglider or skydiver is injured in a sports-related accident they often suffer serious injuries. The most common involved in parachuting and paragliding include:

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and head injury
Broken bones and fractures to the feet, ankle, lower leg, femur, hip, pelvis and upper limbs
Injury to the thorax and abdomen
Sprains, strains and contusions
Spinal cord injury involving quadriplegia and paraplegia
Death
Any catastrophic injury occurring when skydiving, paragliding or parasailing can be life altering and often involves years of rehabilitation, physical therapy and surgeries. Because of that, it is essential to hire an attorney to handle a claim for financial compensation.

Hiring an Attorney to Prosecute a Serious Injury or Fatality Related to a Paraglide or Parachute Incident
Skydiving and paragliding accidents are all too common. Many aerial sport victims are at risk of catastrophic injuries or death at nearly every phase of participating in the sport. Most aerial sport accident claims involve:

Defective products
Improper parachute packing
Malfunctioning equipment
Worn components
Cord defect
Defective steering handle
Harness failures
Entanglements
Poorly maintained gear and equipment
Proving liability in an accident of any highly dangerous activity can be complicated. The amount of compensation paid often depends on the responsibility that particular defendant in the lawsuit had over the injured victim.

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers: Experience You Need When It Comes to Prosecuting Serious Injury Matters
Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers have extensive experience in handling parasailing and skydiving accident claims. Our legal team is familiar with skydiving and paragliding malfunctions and defective equipment where the participant has no legal responsibility for causing the accident. We represent victims and surviving family members who have a legal right to seek financial compensation to recover all monetary damages including medical expenses, lost time away from work, injuries, and others.

Our legal team can evaluate your case and hold all responsible parties accountable for their negligence. You may be able to see compensation from third parties that could include an instructor, training center, recreation company, product manufacturers and retailers. Call our law offices at (888) 424-5757 to schedule your free case review with our experienced personal injury attorneys who specialize in aerial sports accidents including parachuting and paragliding.