Torrey Pines Gulls / Gary and Larry FogelIn 2006, I began learning to fly RC planes with lots of help from the good people in the Torrey Pines Gulls RC club (special thanks to Parviz K. and John B. for their time). I had spoken with Gary Fogel on the phone, and I attended their 2006 Christmas party where I hoped to meet him in person. Unfortunately, Gary wasn't able to make it, but I contacted him by email the next day on
December 13th, 2006:
Hello Gary,
I'm sorry that you weren't able to make the Christmas party last night. I enjoyed many conversations with members and other attendees. The topic of the Soaring Council came up, and I was advised that it might be the place to start. As a result, I've drafted a short email message inquiring about the next meeting (to hopefully get the ball rolling). I'll be sending it to Cliff (TP Gulls president) and several others. I'd like to know if you'd like to be included in that list of recipients. Please let me know as soon as you can, so I can send it off.
Thanks for all of your time so far,
Bob Kuczewski
I also began researching the name of "Fogel" connected with the Gliderport and found the following letter from Larry Fogel (Gary's father) on-line:
August 8, 2002
Mr. David Jebb
Torrey Pines Gliderport
2800 Torrey Pines Scenic Drive
San Diego, CA 92037
Dear Mr. Jebb,
Your very recent concern for flight safety at the Torrey Pines Gliderport should be commended; however, you appear to be using flight safety as a way to remove radio-controlled model soaring from this site.
The Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) insurance covering this activity at Torrey Pines is fully documented with Christian Anderson, City of San Diego Real Estate Assets Department. You may obtain a copy of this from him. This insurance "policy provides broad and unique coverage for flying site owners, protecting them from potential liability for injury or damage resulting from club activities on a flying site.
Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company has an A.M. Best rating of A, IXV and is a member of the Royal & Sun Alliance Group, one of the world's largest insurance organizations. Authorization for AMA to issue certificates of insurance naming site owners as additional insured. This is the equivalent of issuing an endorsement to the policy and assures the site owner of coverage equal to or exceeding coverage for AMA, it's members and clubs. Site owner's coverage is primary. This means that the AMA policy pays on the site owner's behalf without involvement of the site owner's own insurance. Acts voiding coverage by any other insured do not apply to site owners. Should an AMA member or club either do something, or fail to do something that voids coverage for that member or club, the site owner still has coverage under this policy. Contractual liability coverage. This coverage clause reinforces the club's contractual obligations (if any) to indemnify and hold harmless the site owner for injury or damage in connection with the club's use of the site. Non-owned auto coverage for site owners when required by contract. This policy protects the site owner in the event of an auto accident on-site that result in a claim against the site owner. The $2,500,000 aggregate limit of liability applies per location (flying site). This limit of liability usually exceeds the site owner's requirements and the per location aggregate means the site owner does not share the limit with other site owners. It has the effect of a separate policy for each site owner. The insurer must give AMA 150 days notice of cancellation or non-renewal. This allows ample time for AMA to replace the coverage and to notify certificate holders of the change in coverage. AMA pays the entire annual premium at the beginning of the policy year so the policy cannot be canceled for non-payment." (ref. Letter from Carl Maroney, AMA to Christian Anderson dated August 7, 2002).
If you wish to have Air California Adventure, LLC co-insured, you simply have to request this in writing to either or both of the AMA chartered radio-controlled model clubs (Torrey Pines Gulls, Torrey Pines Scale Soaring Society) so that they can name you as additionally insured. There is a filing fee of $20 for each action (paid for by the club(s)).
You indicate that flight safety at the Torrey Pines Gliderport has been deteriorating for some time: "there are been at least 18 collisions of RC craft with manned craft at the site in the last two years" "In the month of June 2002, there were at least 8 RC crashes. In July 2002 there were 8 reported crashes." Evidently, the increasing traffic of paragliders (domestic and foreign) and trainees has made for a dangerous situation. We would certainly appreciate copies of the Incident Reports documenting each of these events, where they occurred along the cliff, who were the pilots involved, statements from each pilot, and any actions taken on your part to rectify these situations. We should then determine what new conditions contribute to the recent decline in safety.
The flight safety rules at Torrey Pines were first adopted in 1978, revised in 1995 with Richard Hanson, Vice President of AMA present. These are essentially the same as the rules currently posted at the gliderport. They are indeed consistent with the AMA Safety Code. In signing the lease you accepted these flight rules. This can only mean that you are admitting that the flight safety rules posted at the cliff are not being properly enforced. Your lack of "competent management" places you in direct violation of Section 1.6 of your lease.
There are a number of remedies for this deteriorating situation. For example, the flight times or airspace can be completely separated for models and ultralight aircraft (rather than the complete removal of either form of motorless flight). Your banning of radio-controlled flight indicates your bias (that you believe the entire fault for the incidents lies with the radio-controlled modelers). Your unwillingness to call upon the Torrey Pines Soaring Council to adjudicate this matter indicates a lack of concern for this long-standing procedure (originally established by the City). This is also in direct violation of your lease that states "Flight Director/LESSEE will consult with the Torrey Pines Soaring Council, which represents all soaring user groups in forming the above mentioned rules and regulations" (Recital 4). Further, your lease states that this is a "historical non-powered flight park." The historical uses include full-scale sailplanes, radio-controlled sailplanes, hang gliders, and paragliders. This is also reflected in the Torrey Pines Gliderport historical marker that refers to "all forms of motorless flight." This public facility must remain just that. Any competent manager would find effective and safe ways for all forms of motorless flight to co-exist rather than simply ban any one form of flight. Incidentally, you will be held responsible for any destruction of club property that was placed on this site with your prior consent.
Evidently, your desire to build an increasingly profitable paragliding operation has already greatly reduced hang glider flying at the cliff. You have greatly reduced radio-controlled operations at the cliff by increasing the daily fee beyond the point affordable by younger and retired pilots. Clearly you have a major conflict of interest between profit and flight safety. You can show your willingness to have equitable flight at the gliderport by shutting down all flight operations until this issue is resolved. You may expect appropriate legal action on this matter. Copies of this letter are being forwarded to all interested parties.
Sincerely,
Lawrence J. Fogel
AMA representative, Torrey Pines Soaring Council
858 455-6449
Wow!!
Larry Fogel (an RC pilot) had written to Jebb:
"Evidently, your desire to build an increasingly profitable paragliding
operation has already greatly reduced hang glider flying at the cliff."He nailed it!! Even an RC pilot could see what was happening to hang gliding back in August of 2002!!
Larry also identified the breakdown with the Soaring Council as part of the problem. Larry wrote:
Your unwillingness to call upon the Torrey Pines Soaring Council to adjudicate this matter indicates a lack of concern for this long-standing procedure (originally established by the City). This is also in direct violation of your lease that states "Flight Director/LESSEE will consult with the Torrey Pines Soaring Council, which represents all soaring user groups in forming the above mentioned rules and regulations" (Recital 4).
Larry Fogel was quoting the lease to support his position that the Torrey Pines Soaring Council should be used to "adjudicate" the banning of RC pilots. That was exactly the position that I had taken from my own independent review of the matter. Larry Fogel was rocketing to the top of my "hero" list in December of 2006.