I'm wondering if it is safe to assume the following:
Tim Herr is being paid by Air California Adventure Inc. to protect them from a party (plaintiff) who is suing them for BIG bucks. Why? Because Air California Adventure Inc. personnel neglected to do a proper job of insuring the safety of one of its inexperienced collapsible canopy students. This student (the plaintiff) was injured as a result. Bob K offered his expert perspective in support of the plaintiff's case.
A few observations -
- Tim Herr can only benefit if the SD police arrest Bob K (a U$hPA member) for trespassing on Air California Adventure Inc.'s "territory" (which exists in a
public park in the City of San Diego, CA).
- Tim Herr can only benefit if Bob K (a U$hPA member) gets a restraining order placed against him - as requested by Air California Adventure Inc. personnel.
- Tim Herr can only benefit if Bob K is arrested again after complaints, made by Air California Adventure Inc. personnel, that Bob K (a U$hPA member, and citizen of San Diego, CA) was once again trespassing in a (open to the public) San Diego City Park.
- Tim Herr can only benefit if he meets in "secret" with some U$hPA BOD Committee(?) where he uses his lawyerly skills to paint Bob K (a U$hPA member) as a threat to the U$hPA. The goal of said presentation being to have Bob K's U$hPA membership revoked.
- Tim Herr is being paid GOOD money to win a law suit in favor of the obviously negligent company know as Air California Adventure Inc. Tim Herr, therefore, is also being paid GOOD money to use his lawyerly skills to attack and defame Bob K (a U$hPA member - and witness against his client). This makes it more likely that Mr. Herr will win his case in support of Air California Adventure Inc.
- - - - - -
Oddly,
Tim Herr is ALSO U$hPA's lawyer. He's being paid a significant yearly retainer to PROTECT and DEFEND the U$hPA
and its MEMBERS(!) from incurring more than one kind of damage. So, when a U$hPA member PG Student is injured as a result of the negligence of Air California Adventure Inc. personnel, what is the "common sense" approach?
Well, you'd expect that Tim Herr would lend legal support to the U$hPA member student pilot, correct? Only this didn't happen.
WHY? Instead, Tim Herr took the job of defending a PG Sales and Training Company who's negligence did damage to a U$hPA member pilot. This is SO obviously a CONFLICT OF INTEREST that it is not only
NOT funny, . . . it's comes off as being a violation of legal ethics - the kind of thing an Attorney can be disbarred over.
But then, we can't forget that Tim Herr has now gone on to attack and defame another U$hPA member. That would be Bob K. Significantly, Mr. Herr's
attack is centered so closely
on Bob K's efforts to improve the goings on at
Torrey Pines Glider Port that his agenda
is obvious. Mr Herr's agenda comes off as being - to
KEEP the corrupt, negligent, even criminal activities of Air California Adventure Inc. from being compelled (one way or the other) toward change for the better.
And that "change for the better" would certainly include a better and safer flying environment for ALL U$hPA members who fly at Torrey Pines.
For all intents and purposes, Tim Herr is effectively undermining the integrity of the U$hPA as well as the safety of its member pilots. And guess what? He's FOOLED the majority of the U$hPA BODs into thinking that Bob K is the "bad guy" while he
KNOWS for Dang Sure that
California Adventure Inc. is the real threat to the U$hPA and its member pilots.
I wonder if my assumptions have any merit?
.
. 
Home
