Sign in, say "hi", ... and be welcomed.

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:19 pm

I tried to download last night, and I just tried again for about an hour (see screen below). I eventually tried to follow Bill's suggestion to click on Terms of Service, but that just showed that long scary list and didn't lead to any materials being downloaded. Here's the screen from just a little bit ago:

Download_problems_2.png
Download_problems_2.png (142.02 KiB) Viewed 5851 times


I just sent an email message to Martin Palmaz and Rich Hass:

Martin Palmaz, Richard Hass, and others,

I have been trying to log in to obtain the materials mentioned in your April 18th message included below.

I attempted to do so last night, and I just attempted to do so again. In all cases, I get a screen that says:

LOADING
. . . . . .

I have waited hours, but it does not complete. Others have reported the same problem.

I am protesting the continuation of this hearing if you cannot deliver the materials as set forth in your message.

Bob Kuczewski


My videos are posted on YouTube. Has anyone had any trouble viewing them?

My responses are posted right here in this topic. Has anyone had any trouble reading them?

If the big mighty USHPA can't even run a web site as well as little old Bob, then that's pretty sad. I suspect they can, and that this latest foul up is intentional. Time will tell.

Bill's suggestion of a kangaroo hopping across the screen is the best idea so far.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Free » Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:48 pm

billcummings wrote: the terms of use were intimidating and I decided rather than put my membership at risk by some blunder I might make and since I know how things are going to go anyway my best course of action was not to click the button and close the page.


I can't log in in order to even get to the terms of use. Sure would like a copy of that before it's taken down.
Guess I'll have to wait on the youtube version for the actual kangaroo court show trial.

The expulsion hearing is like a Hillary Press Conference:
Only certain people can attend
Only scripted questions will be allowed
You can't talk about it and must sign a liability waiver beforehand in case of injury or death
Free
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:47 pm

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby wingspan33 » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:07 pm

Free wrote:. . . Guess I'll have to wait on the youtube version for the actual kangaroo show trial. . .


I somehow doubt that a u$hPa tele-conference (audio only) hearing will be put up on YouTube.

Then again, I suppose that while the audio played a video of monkeys in a zoo enclosure throwing excrement around could be shown.

Either way I'd love to listen to an audio file of the "hearing".
wingspan33
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:24 pm

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Rick Masters » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:27 pm

All hang glider pilots who voted for the Secret Society Corporation raise your hands.

Time to start over.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:34 pm

Free wrote:I can't log in in order to even get to the terms of use. Sure would like a copy of that before it's taken down.


Hi Warren. It turns out that the terms of use are available without logging in. I just tried to download the materials again (a third time with no luck) and I signed out and the terms were available on the "logged out" public page. Here they are (I don't have time to format them nicely right now):

USHPA Website Terms of Use
Welcome to the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc.'s ("USHPA") Web site (the "USHPA Site"). USHPA is a California Non-Profit Mutual Benefit Corporation, and is a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. PLEASE READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEB SITE. By using the USHPA Site, you signify your agreement to these terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms of use, please do not use the USHPA Site. USHPA reserves the right, at its discretion, to change, modify, add, or remove portions of these terms at any time without notice to you. Please check these terms periodically for changes. Your continued use of this USHPA Site following the posting of changes to these terms will mean you accept those changes.
Restrictions on Use of Site and Content
All materials contained in the USHPA Site are the copyrighted property of the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc. and/or third-party licensors and are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names on the USHPA Site are proprietary to the United States Hang Gliding Association, Inc. and are protected by U.S. and international trademark laws. No material from the USHPA Site may be copied, reproduced, republished, modified, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your personal, noncommercial home use only, provided that (i) you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices, (ii) you make no modifications to the materials, (iii) you do not use the materials in a manner that suggests an association with the USHPA, and (iv) you do not download quantities of materials to a database that can be used to avoid future downloads from the USHPA Site. The use of any USHPA Site content on any other Web site or computer environment is prohibited. All trademarks, service marks, trade names, and trade dress are proprietary to the USHPA. If you download software from the USHPA Site, the software, including any files, images incorporated in or generated by the software, and data accompanying the software (collectively, the "Software") are licensed to you by the USHPA or third-party licensors for your personal, noncommercial home use only. USHPA does not transfer title to the Software to you. You own the medium on which the Software is recorded, but the USHPA (or third-party licensors) retain full and complete title to the Software and all intellectual property rights in that Software. You may not redistribute, sell, de-compile, reverse engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce the Software to a human-readable form.
Restricted Access Areas; Usernames and Passwords
Some areas of the site are available only to current members, instructors, and/or Directors of the USHPA ("Restricted Access Areas"). Unless you are or possess the appropriate permission granted by the USHPA you are not authorized to view the Members Only Areas.

Unauthorized entry is prohibited and subject to prosecution under the laws of the United States and its various states and possessions. All activities and access attempts are logged. Each individual member of the USHPA is assigned a user name and password for that member's sole use in accessing the Members Only Areas of the USHPA Site. If you are a USHPA member, you agree not to allow others to access the Members Only Areas of the USHPA Site using your user name and password. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the password and account, and you are fully responsible for all activities that occur under your username and password. Anyone logging on to the Members Only Area of the USHPA Site using your username and password can view and modify your personal information. You agree to pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with your username and password at the rates in effect when the fees and charges were incurred. You agree to immediately notify the USHPA of any unauthorized use of your username and password, or if there is any other breach of security. Members are encouraged to change their passwords often and use passwords that cannot be easily guessed (i.e. do not use names, birth dates, etc..)
Credit Cards
USHPA uses your credit card number, billing and shipping information to process purchases you make from the USHPA on line. These purchases may include payment of membership dues as well as merchandise. In addition, the USHPA may provide your credit card number, billing and shipping information to participating merchants from whom you buy goods or services through the USHPA Site. The merchants are solely responsible for how they use that information and any other information they independently acquire from you or about you. Otherwise, we do not share your credit card information with anyone else. To protect the security of your credit card information, we employ the industry-standard Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology. We also encrypt your credit card number when we store your order and whenever we transfer that information to participating merchants.
Disclaimers
THE MATERIALS IN THIS USHPA SITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND ALL SUCH WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE LAW, USHPA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. USHPA DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE MATERIALS ON THE USHPA SITE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE USHPA SITE OR THE SERVERS THAT MAKE SUCH MATERIALS AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS. USHPA DOES NOT WARRANT OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE OR THE RESULTS OF THE USE OF THE MATERIALS ON THE USHPA SITE IN TERMS OF THEIR COMPLETENESS, CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE. YOU ASSUME THE ENTIRE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR, OR CORRECTION. APPLICABLE LAW MAY NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES, SO THE ABOVE EXCLUSION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. USHPA EXPLICITLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY, CONTENT, OR AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION FOUND ON SITES THAT LINK TO OR FROM THE USHPA SITE. THE USHPA CANNOT ENSURE THAT YOU WILL BE SATISFIED WITH ANY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES THAT YOU PURCHASE FROM A THIRD-PARTY SITE THAT LINKS TO OR FROM THE USHPA SITE OR THIRD-PARTY CONTENT ON THE USHPA SITE. THE USHPA DOES NOT ENDORSE ANY OF THE SERVICES OR MERCHANDISE AVAILABLE FROM THIRD PARTIES THAT MAY BE LINKED TO THE USHPA SITE, NOR HAS THE USHPA TAKEN ANY STEPS TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF, ANY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN SUCH THIRD-PARTY SITES OR CONTENT. THE USHPA DOES NOT MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE SECURITY OF ANY INFORMATION (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CREDIT CARD AND OTHER PERSONAL INFORMATION) YOU MIGHT BE REQUESTED TO GIVE ANY THIRD-PARTY, AND YOU HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVE ANY CLAIM AGAINST THE USHPA WITH RESPECT TO SUCH SITES AND THIRD-PARTY CONTENT. THE USHPA STRONGLY ENCOURAGES YOU TO MAKE WHATEVER INVESTIGATION YOU FEEL NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY ONLINE OR OFFLINE TRANSACTION WITH ANY OF THESE THIRD PARTIES. THE USHPA SITE CONTAINS SOME CONTENT SUPPLIED BY THIRD PARTIES AND ASSOCIATION MEMBERS. IN DISPLAYING SUCH CONTENT, USHPA IS A DISTRIBUTOR (AND NOT A PUBLISHER) OF CONTENT SUPPLIED BY THIRD PARTIES AND MEMBERS. ANY OPINIONS, ADVICE, STATEMENTS, SERVICES, OFFERS, OR OTHER INFORMATION OR CONTENT EXPRESSED OR MADE AVAILABLE BY THIRD PARTIES, INCLUDING INFORMATION PROVIDERS, MEMBERS OR ANY OTHER USER OF THE USHPA SITE, ARE THOSE OF THE RESPECTIVE AUTHOR(S) OR DISTRIBUTOR(S) AND NOT OF THE USHPA. NEITHER THE USHPA NOR ANY THIRD-PARTY PROVIDER OF INFORMATION GUARANTEES THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR USEFULNESS OF ANY CONTENT, NOR ITS MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE CONTENT SUPPLIED BY THIRD PARTIES AND ASSOCIATION MEMBERS AND AVAILABLE ON THE USHPA SITE REPRESENTS THE OPINIONS AND JUDGMENTS OF THE RESPECTIVE INFORMATION PROVIDER, OR MEMBER. USHPA NEITHER ENDORSES NOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY OPINION, ADVICE OR STATEMENT MADE ON THE USHPA SITE BY ANYONE OTHER THAN AUTHORIZED USHPA EMPLOYEE SPOKESPERSONS WHILE ACTING IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL THE USHPA BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY A USHPA SITE USER'S RELIANCE ON INFORMATION OBTAINED THROUGH THE USHPA SITE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USHPA SITE USER TO EVALUATE THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR USEFULNESS OF ANY INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE OR OTHER CONTENT AVAILABLE THROUGH THE USHPA SITE. PLEASE SEEK THE ADVICE OF PROFESSIONALS, AS APPROPRIATE, REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF ANY SPECIFIC INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE OR OTHER CONTENT.
Limitation of Liability
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE, SHALL USHPA BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES THAT RESULT FROM THE USE OF, OR THE INABILITY TO USE, THE USHPA SITE OR MATERIALS OR FUNCTIONS ON THE USHPA SITE, EVEN IF USHPA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. APPLICABLE LAW MAY NOT ALLOW THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY OR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. IF YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH ANY USHPA SITE MATERIAL OR WITH ANY OF THE USHPA SITE'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS, YOUR SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY IS TO DISCONTINUE USING THE USHPA SITE.
Forums and Messaging
The USHPA, at its pleasure, may choose to set up framework and systems that allow members to communicate with one another through the USHPA website. This may include, but are not limited to:

Forums - These can be chat areas or message board functions

Messaging Systems - These can be automatic notifications or paging systems, such as PilotConnect that are used to send messages from one member to another.

Every attempt has been made to ensure the privacy of members as well as provide a means of allowing members to connect with one another. If you participate in any Forum or use any Messaging System within the USHPA Site, you must not use it to:

* defame, abuse, harass or threaten others;
* make any bigoted, hateful, or racially offensive statements;
* advocate illegal activity or discuss illegal activities with the intent to commit them;
* post or distribute any material that infringes and/or violates any right of a third party or any law;
* post or distribute any vulgar, obscene, discourteous, or indecent language or images;
* advertise or sell to or solicit others;
* post or distribute chain letters, pyramid schemes, or solicitations;
* commercial purposes of any kind;
* post or distribute any software or other materials that contain a virus or other harmful component; or
* post material or make statements that do not generally pertain to the designated topic or theme of any chat room or bulletin board.

USHPA reserves the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any activities by you in the Forum, including, but not limited to messages posted by you. USHPA also reserves the right to ban you from using its systems if you violate these terms of use.

The author(s) of messages appearing shall remain solely responsible for the content of their messages. Although USHPA does not and cannot review the messages posted and is not responsible for the content of any of these messages, the USHPA reserves the right to remove or edit content from any Forum at any time and for any reason or no reason at all. The USHPA has no duty to remove or edit any content in any Forum or Message, whether or not requested by you. By uploading materials to any Forum or submitting any materials to USHPA, you automatically grant (or warrant that the owner of such materials expressly granted) USHPA a perpetual, royalty-free, irrevocable, nonexclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and display, create derivative works from and distribute such materials or incorporate such materials into any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed throughout the universe. In addition, you warrant that all so-called "moral rights" in those materials have been waived.

When participating in a Forum, or receiving a message from another, never assume that people are who they say they are, know what they say they know, or are affiliated with whom they say they are affiliated with in any chat room, message board, or other user- generated content area. Information obtained in a Forum or message may not be reliable, and it is not a good idea to trade, make any investment decisions or make flying decisions based solely or largely on information you cannot confirm. USHPA cannot be responsible for the content or accuracy of any information, and shall not be responsible for any trading, investment or flying decisions made based on such information.
Trademarks
"USHPA", "Hang Gliding magazine" "Paragliding magazine", "Hang Gliding & Paragliding magazine" are trademarks and, "United States Hang Gliding Assn", the Circular sunburst and rectangular glider logos, and the glider/bird logo are all registered trademarks of the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc., All rights reserved.
Indemnification
You are entirely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your Password and account and for all activities that occur under your account. You hereby indemnify, defend, and hold the USHPA as the authors of software that USHPA may choose to use in conjunction with webservices and each of their respective officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors, and licensees, (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties") harmless from and against any and all liabilities and costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees') incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you of this Agreement or claims arising from the transmission of messages by you in the Forum areas of the USHPA Site as well as any other use of the USHPA Site by you or under your username and password, . You shall use your best efforts to cooperate with the USHPA in the defense of any claim. The USHPA reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter otherwise subject to indemnification by you.
Termination
These terms are effective until terminated by either party. You may terminate these terms at any time by discontinuing use of the USHPA Site and destroying all materials obtained from the USHPA Site and all related documentation and all copies and installations thereof, whether made under these terms or otherwise. Your access to the USHPA Site may be terminated immediately without notice from us in the event of any conduct by You that USHPA, in its sole discretion, considers to be unacceptable, or if in our sole discretion you fail to comply with any term or provision of these terms. Upon termination, you must cease use of the USHPA Site and destroy all materials obtained from such site and all copies thereof, whether made under these terms or otherwise. The provisions of Sections B through N shall survive termination of this Agreement.
Sites Linked to ushpa.aero
Only links that comply with the following Linking Requirements are authorized. When linking from third party site to the USHPA Site, the link must comply with the Linking Requirements. USHPA reserves the right to disable links from third-party sites to the USHPA Site in its sole discretion without notice. Linking Requirements

1. The link shall either be a textual link or a logo link. The textual link shall state "Click Here to go to the Official USHPA Web site". The logo link shall be the logo provided below ("Logo"). By downloading the Logo, you agree to be bound by these Linking Requirements. You may download the logo by right clicking on the logo and clicking "Save As".
2. You may only use the Logo on your Web site, and not in any other manner. It must always be an active link to the USHPA Site's home page at http://www.ushpa.aero. HTML code for the link is shown below.
3. The Logo includes the phrase "To USHPA", describing the significance of the Logo on your site (i.e., the Logo is a link to USHPA, not an endorsement of your site). You may not remove or alter this or any other element of the Logo.
4. The Logo may be used only on Web pages that make accurate references to USHPA or its products or services, and must be displayed adjacent to the reference or at the bottom of the same page. Your Web page title and other trademarks and logos must appear at least as prominent as the Logo. You may not display the Logo in any manner that implies sponsorship, endorsement, or license by USHPA.
5. The Logo must appear by itself, with a minimum spacing (the height of the Logo) between each side of the Logo and other graphic or textual elements on your page. The Logo may not be used as a feature or design element of any other logo.
6. You may not alter the Logo in any manner, including size, proportions, colors, elements, etc., or animate, morph or otherwise distort its perspective or two-dimensional appearance.
7. You may not use the Logo on any site that disparages the USHPA or its products or services, infringes any USHPA intellectual property or other rights, or violates any state, federal or international law.
8. These Policies do not grant a license or any other right in any of the USHPA's logos or trademarks. USHPA reserves the right in its sole discretion to terminate or modify permission to use the Logo at any time. USHPA reserves the right to take action against any use that does not conform to these Policies, infringes any USHPA intellectual property or other right, or violates other applicable law.
9. USHPA DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES THAT MAY BE EXPRESS OR IMPLIED BY LAW REGARDING THE LOGO, INCLUDING WARRANTIES AGAINST INFRINGEMENT.

USHPA Logo code
<A HREF="http://www.ushpa.aero"><IMG SRC="media/left_logo.jpg" BORDER="0"></A>
Jurisdictional Issues
Unless otherwise specified, the materials on the USHPA Site are presented solely for the purpose of providing information on the sports of Hang Gliding and Paragliding in the United States. USHPA makes no representation that materials on the USHPA Site are appropriate or available for use in any particular location. Those who choose to access the USHPA Site do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with local laws, if and to the extent local laws are applicable. Software from this site is further subject to United States export controls. No software from this site may be downloaded or otherwise exported or reexported (i) into (or to a national or resident of) Cuba, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Iran, Syria, or any other country to which the U.S. has embargoed goods; or (ii) to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department's list of Specially Designated Nationals or the U.S. Commerce Department's Table of Deny Orders. By downloading or using the Software, you represent and warrant that you are not located in, under the control of, or a national or resident of any such country or on any such list.
General Provisions
This Agreement, your rights and obligations, and all action contemplated by this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the United States of America and the State of California, as if the Agreement was a contract wholly entered into and wholly performed within the State of California. [This Agreement will not be governed by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.] If any provision in this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, then that provision shall be deemed severable from these terms and the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect. This Agreement, incorporates by reference any notice by USHPA contained in any of the USHPA Site pages, including but not limited to the USHPA Privacy Policy and constitutes the entire agreement between you and the USHPA relating to the subject matter herein and shall not be modified except in writing, signed by both parties, or by the subsequent posting of modified terms and conditions by the USHPA on the USHPA Site. No waiver by either party of any breach or default hereunder shall be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or subsequent breach or default. The section headings used herein are for convenience only and shall not be given any legal import.
Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement
We may give notice to our users by means of a general notice on the USHPA Site, electronic mail to a user's e-mail address on our records, or by written communication sent by first-class mail to a user's address on our records. ALL INQUIRIES NOT RELEVANT TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WILL RECEIVE NO RESPONSE. Pursuant to Title 17, United States Code, Section 512(c)(2), notifications of claimed copyright infringement should be sent to Service Provider's Designated Agent. Notification must be submitted to the following Designated Agent:

Service Provider: USHPA

Name of Agent Designated to Receive Notification of Claimed Infringement: Rich Hass, President

Full Address of Designated Agent to Which Notification Should Be Sent:
PO Box 1330
Colorado Springs, CO 80901-1330

Telephone Number of Designated Agent: (719) 632-8300

Facsimile Number of Designated Agent: (719) 632-6417

E-Mail Address of Designated Agent: designatedagent@ushpa.aero

To be effective, the notification must be a written communication that includes the following:

1. A physical or electronic signature of person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed;
2. Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site;
3. Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material;
4. Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact the complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which the complaining party may be contacted;
5. A statement that the complaining party has a good-faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and
6. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Last Updated: December 2010- RDJ
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:35 pm

RickMasters wrote:All hang glider pilots who voted for the Secret Society Corporation raise your hands.


Seeing no hands, I second Rick's following motion:

RickMasters wrote:Time to start over.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:57 pm

I just got a response from Martin Palmaz:

Robert Kuczewski,

We are looking into your access to the materials and will respond to you once we've had an opportunity to review.

Martin Palmaz


I followed up with this:

Martin and others,

For the record, I'm not the only person to have problems. You can see others here:

http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1787&start=140#p11505

You can also see screen captures of what we're seeing if that's helpful. It is now 4 hours before the scheduled hearing. I have much other preparation to do before the hearing, and this is just another USHPA monkey wrench in justice.

As I've requested before, I am again requesting that this hearing be postponed until at least 10 days after USHPA has submitted it's final information. I just do not have time to respond in time. I also again request to be able to have legal representation present at the hearing (which at this late date will also support a postponement).

Finally, the second trespassing case is scheduled for court tomorrow. The first case was dismissed, and I believe this one will be also. Given that this outcome bears significantly in this case, I again request that the hearing be postponed.

Sincerely,
Bob Kuczewski
858-204-7499
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

USHPA Expulsion Proceeding Public Forum

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:44 pm

Moderator's Note: This post/topic was originally created in the New Users Forum so anyone registering during the "hearing" could register and post to it right away (without being verified ... since I was in the hearing and unable to verify them). I've reintegrated the posts from that topic to this topic. All posts retain the time stamp of their posting.

I've created this topic explicitly for anyone registering for the US Hawks who I may not have had time to add to the Approved Users list. You should be able to post here just after registering, and I'll integrate responses with the other topic after the "Hearing".

Here are the two videos referenced in my response:

November 9th Incident: http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629&start=330#p11400


Tandem Violation: http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629start=330#p11402


Here's a link to the discussion topic about the expulsion:

     http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1787

Here's a link to a discussion topic on the Oz Forum:

    http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41619



Here's the email message that I sent along with my written response:

From: Bob Kuczewski
To: Richard Hass
Cc: Martin Palmaz

Subject: Expulsion Response
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:54:20 -0700

Rich Hass, Martin Palmaz and others,

I have attached my written response for upcoming the Expulsion Proceeding.

Bob Kuczewski




Here's the attached PDF text which contains my written response:

INTRODUCTION


USHPA Board Members,

I have read the list of charges included in the Martin Palmaz letter dated March 20th, 2015. I have provided a written response to each of those charges by the numbers below with additional follow-on information. I have also received a second letter from Richard Hass on April 14th, 2015. The charges listed in the second letter were not sent in a timely manner so that I would have them within the required 10 days before the scheduled hearing on April 22nd. I asked Mr. Hass and Mr. Palmaz for a postponement of this hearing until the first week in May (ideally May 6th) so that I might address those additional charges, but Mr. Hass refused to grant me the requested postponement. Additionally, Mr. Hass responded to my request for postponement (see attached messages) by stating:

“While the memo provides additional detail to the claims already of record as you requested; it doesn’t add any new claims."


Similarly, on the Oz Report Forum, I asserted to Mr. Forbes a need for more time to address the recently added second letter, and he replied on April 16th, 2015 with this statement:

“There was nothing new in the most recent communication to him, just an emphasis on the questions that will be asked and a request that he come up with credible answers (if such there are) for those questions.”


I believe that both of these statements are false, and I believe that there are explicitly new accusations and new questions in the second letter. However, since they were not presented in a timely manner, and since both Richard Hass and Mark Forbes assert that there is no new material in them, and since I was not granted the requested postponement to address them, I will confine my responses to the original Martin Palmaz letter of March 20th, 2015. The same is true of any additional materials that were offered to me via USHPA's web site on April 15th or any later date. I simply have not been given sufficient time to review all those additional materials and provide a response. If USHPA wishes to introduce items from the second letter or from USHPA's web site, then I am again requesting a postponement of my required response to May 6th, 2015.

In the event that USHPA decides to proceed with the expulsion hearing on April 22nd, 2015 without providing the requested postponement, I choose to make the proceedings open to all members and I will attend in the capacity of an observing member. I hereby ask that this document be distributed to all Directors in advance of the meeting, and that the video evidence mentioned in this document be viewed by all Directors at the meeting. Anyone listening from home may simultaneously view the videos from the web. And finally, I ask that one of the Directors most favorable to my efforts read this entire document as my statement to the Board.

Sincerely,

Bob Kuczewski
USHPA #81898


Video Evidence

The following videos (available at USHawks.org) are included in this response:

    November 9th Incident: http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629&start=330#p11400
    Tandem Violation: http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629start=330#p11402


ANSWERS TO CHARGES BY THE NUMBERS

Let me start by the numbers. I will list the number of each charge from the Martin Palmaz letter of March 20th, 2015. I will immediately follow each number with “True” or “False” or “Not a violation”. The meanings of these are as follows:

    True – The charge is factual in supporting my expulsion from USHPA.
    False – The charge is false and does not support my expulsion from USHPA.
    Not a violation – The charge itself is not a violation of any known rule, SOP, or Bylaw.

I will then follow each item with a brief description stating the facts as I know them.

    1. Not a violation – Creating national hang gliding associations is not a violation of any USHPA SOP that I have ever read or has ever been presented to me (see Anti-Trust laws of United States).
     
    2. False – I have not endangered the safety of anyone at Torrey Pines.
     
    2a. False – I have not disrupted the training of students at Torrey Pines.
     
    2b. False – I have not disrupted training of students at Torrey Pines.
     
    2c. Not a violation – There is no rule prohibiting pilots from being on the field at Torrey Pines.
     
    2d. Not a violation – There is no rule prohibiting pilots from being on the field at Torrey Pines.
     
    3. False – I have not endangered the Torrey Pines Gliderport.
     
    4. False – I have not made misstatements or misrepresentations to the City Council.
     
    5. False – I have not misrepresented my relationship with USHPA to the City Council.
     
    6. False – I absolutely believe those pictures of Gabe Jebb prompted the SOP change.
     
    7. False – I have not published false or misleading statements about USHPA.
     
    8. False – I have not misrepresented my qualifications to serve as an expert witness.
     
    8a. False – I have not misrepresented my paragliding experience.
     
    8b. False – I have not misrepresented my hang gliding experience.
     
    8c. False – I have not misrepresented my duties as a USHPA Regional Director.
     
    9. False – I have not made misrepresentations as an expert witness.
     
    9a. False – I have personally witnessed at least 2 such collisions at Torrey Pines.
     
    9b. False – My statements were made with respect to the top landing area since that was the area where the accident took place. The restriction is based on physical size of the LZ, obstructions on the LZ, gliders on the ground in the LZ, students being trained on the LZ, and traffic on the LZ.
     
    9c. False – The Torrey Pines landing zone is technically challenging for a variety of reasons including traffic in the air, kiting on the ground, instruction on the ground, spectators and bystanders in the LZ, multiple approach patterns, multiple aircraft types (HG, PG, RC, and sometimes sailplanes), complex wind patterns, potential rotor, and many other reasons.
     
    9d. False – Minimum flight hours are a component of USHPA ratings which are used to rate sites.
     
    9e. False – Minimum site ratings is a common practice. Sometimes that rating is “No rating”.
     
    9f. False – USHPA SOPs for P1 (12-02.13): “A Beginner pilot has the knowledge and basic skills necessary to fly and practice under direct instructor supervision and within significant operating limitations.” The phrase “direct instructor supervision” clearly implies a method of communication by which the instructor may provide supervision. For sites like Dockweiler, this might be direct verbal communication. For sites like Torrey, Sylmar, Crestline, this is typically via direct communication via radio.
     
    9g. False – I have watched the video and there were numerous gliders in the air and on the ground that day. It was a particularly good day as evidenced by the antics of tandem pilots Brad Geary and Max Marien. Furthermore, the fact that the two students collided while under instructor supervision is prima facie evidence that it was crowded enough for a collision.
     
    9h. False – Allowing students to fly on a crowded day with ratings 2 or 3 levels below the site rating without direct supervision is an extreme departure from standard practice.
     
    9i. False – The Torrey Pines Gliderport is rated as H4/P3 for a variety of reasons. Students without the required rating should only fly in uncrowded conditions and under direct radio supervision.
     
    9j. False – All instruction of students must provide a reasonable “buffer” between each student and all other aircraft. The distance of the “buffer” must be based on the glider's speed, and the maximum expected time that it will take the student to control their glider or respond to commands. Any distance less than that is an accident waiting to happen.
     
    9k. False – Every site must have rules (either explicit or implicit) to maintain safe separation between aircraft on approach and landing.
     
    9l. False – I did not imply that multiple gliders could not land safely at Torrey Pines given pilots with the proper level of expertise.
     
    9m. False – It does require extreme vigilance and concentration to safely monitor and guide a student who lacks the skills and ratings required to fly in the ambient conditions. When those ambient conditions include crowding, the difficulty for the instructor does increase exponentially. Indeed, when crowding is severe, there is no amount of instructor vigilance or concentration which can keep the student safe.
     
    9n. False – Any distraction of the instructor (including from illness) represents a significant increase in risk to any student requiring guidance in the air.
     
    9o. False – It is improper to allow pilots to exercise the privileges of any rating without having completed all the requirements and documents needed to obtain the rating.

GENERAL DISCUSSION BY CATEGORY

In addition to answering each charge “by the numbers” (above) I'd like to add some additional comments to each group of similar charges.

US Hawks

I have examined the USHPA documents, and I have not found any USHPA rule against creating competing organizations. Furthermore, since USHPA is effectively a monopoly, any threat to expel me for this particular charge is likely a violation of Anti-Trust laws. I have learned that someone has contacted the United States Department of Justice on this matter, and I have no further comment at this time.

Torrey Pines

The charges related to my "disruption" of instruction and being in an "active airfield restricted area" are all false. Those were the claims that Robin Marien used to try to convince the Judge (who had no experience in hang gliding or paragliding) that Torrey Pines was effectively equivalent to LAX airport. The “prosecution” (Robin Marien and his lawyer) presented their case for at least 6 days over the course of 4 months. During that entire time, they controlled the calling of witnesses and the direct questioning of those witnesses. They rested their case 1 hour before the end of the final day of the trial. So any statements made by the Judge up to that time were made without hearing a word of our formal defense case.

The reason that we were only given 1 hour to present our defense was evident in the Judge's final ruling. Robin Marien and his long list of witnesses had failed to show any evidence of violence or threats of violence or stalking or any other conduct required to sustain their request for a workplace violence restraining order against me. At that point, the Judge really didn't need to hear much of our defense, and in the interests of saving time and expense (for everyone) she severely limited our presentation of witnesses and facts. In particular, she allowed almost no testimony directed at establishing pilots' rights to use the site if they did not directly address the issue of workplace violence.

Even so, in the Judge's final ruling she wrote:

“Petitioner [Robin Marien and Air California Adventure] agrees that Respondent [Bob Kuczewski], being a pilot , has a right to be in the restricted area.”


She went on to say:

“there is no indication that Respondent [Bob Kuczewski] has caused harm or intends to cause harm to any of Petitioner's employees. Under California law Civil Code Sec. 1708.8, it is not per se illegal for someone to film another in a public place regardless of whether there is a physical trespass or not ... (Civ. Code, section 1708.8). Use of the camera in a public forum is clearly acceptable but they cannot be used to harass or invade the privacy of another. Petitioner has not proven that Respondent has violated any privacy laws.”


She further went on to say:

“none of the facts seem to support the conclusion that anything he [Bob Kuczewski] is doing is illegal”


She concluded with:

“The temporary restraining order is therefore denied and dismissed.”


Now there can be many different interpretations of what the Judge said (and I'm sure there will be), but her final ruling was definitive and unambiguous. The order was denied and dismissed. In other words, Robin Marien, and Gabriel Jebb, and Danielle Kinch, and their whole crew had falsely accused me of doing something that I had not done. That speaks volumes. That ruling clearly casts doubt on any of the past, present, and future claims made by Robin Marien and his “crew” against me. So any accusations by Robin Marien or any of his employees or associates must be viewed in light of them making false accusations which were not upheld in a court of law.

The take away message from this – for USHPA – is that when evaluating conflicting claims between Robin Marien and myself, I have earned and deserve the benefit of the doubt. I add this “benefit of doubt” to the already implied presumption of innocence and ask that all of the charges based on allegations by Robin Marien or his “crew” be dismissed by USHPA. These include charges 2, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, and 3.

As additional supporting material, I direct the USHPA Board to the photographic and video evidence in the topic titled “Jailed for taking pictures at Torrey” available at:

    http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629

In addition to the photos and video of the event, that topic also contains a full transcript of the event.

City Council

I stand behind all of my statements to the San Diego City Council. In several years of speeches, it wouldn't surprise me if I had made a mistake somewhere, and I'd be happy to review any specific statement that USHPA has a problem with. But so far, USHPA hasn't shown one statement that I've made to the City Council that is false or a misrepresentation of anything. I may speculate or ask rhetorical questions when presenting to the City Council, but I do not make false statements or statements that are misrepresentations.

The Palmaz letter does call out my statements that the USHPA helmet SOP change was based on the November 9th incident with Gabe Jebb. I firmly believe my representation to the City Council was correct, and I have yet to see any evidence from USHPA (or anyone else) to the contrary. The old helmet SOP had been in place for years, and yet within weeks of my filming and publishing of Gabe Jebb's poor example, the USHPA EC "coincidentally" felt the need to change that SOP … between USHPA Board Meetings? Furthermore, Rich Hass specifically wrote an unsolicited letter to me telling me about that particular SOP change. Why would he do that if the SOP change was completely independent of that incident?

USHPA

There's only one charge in this category: "Repeated publication of false and misleading statements concerning USHPA, its officers and its directors." Again, there have been no specifics provided. Instead, I expect Tim Herr will dredge up some obscure error I've made somewhere in the last 10 years or cite my improper spelling of "U$HPA" as a "false or misleading statement". If there's something that USHPA feels I've published that's in error, then the proper procedure is to cite that specific publication and communicate a request for correction. To date, USHPA has failed to make any such a request.

I stand fully behind my primary criticisms of USHPA:

  1. Failure to act responsibly regarding the problems at Torrey Pines.
     
  2. Failure to support a balanced Soaring Council as per USHPA's Spring 2010 Board Resolution.
     
  3. Arbitrarily deciding who can attend or cannot attend Executive Committee meetings.
     
  4. Failure to provide open and accountable voting records by the Board. Note that the Board's recent practice of reporting “unanimous” votes does not satisfy this requirement because it does not give members an unambiguous voting record for each Director. Members cannot tell if a particular Director simply failed to vote or may not have even been in the room. Several years ago I had a fairly detailed discussion about this problem with Director Bolosky (see attached email from Bill Bolosky). Mr. Bolosky was attempting to remedy this problem by keeping an accurate accounting of which Directors entered or exited the room so absent Directors could be tracked. However, even if such a system were implemented, it would not account for Directors who either failed to vote or later claimed to fail to vote. The bottom line is that even to this day (as evidenced by the Board's most recent minutes) there is no unambiguous way for members to tell which Directors voted for which measures.

Expert Witness in Hamby Case

This category of charges includes claims that I've misrepresented my hang gliding experience or my paragliding experience or my duties as a Regional Director. As mentioned in the introduction, I have have requested the specific statements that USHPA is claiming that I've made. USHPA has not responded in a timely manner with any specific statements despite my repeated requests. Unless shown otherwise, I believe the description of my experience and/or duties in those capacities was properly represented. In particular, my duties as a Regional Director were taken Directly from the USHPA SOPs that defined them.

Testimony in Hamby Case

This category of charges is USHPA's (and Tim Herr's) attempt to either punish me or get me to recant my testimony in a case where a young woman was injured while under radio instruction with a Torrey Pines instructor. As listed by the numbers (above), I stand behind all of the statements made in that testimony.

As background for this discussion, I direct the USHPA Board to the video evidence in the topic titled “Jailed for taking pictures at Torrey” available at:

    http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1629

That video shows not only the incident itself but a subsequent flight by two Torrey Pines Tandem instructors (Brad Geary and Max Marien) each with a child passenger engaging in stunts that clearly threaten USHPA's FAA tandem exemption and possibly the FAA's view of our ability to be “self-regulated” sports under USHPA's domination. This is particularly troubling given the recent events at Jean Lake.

With regard to the ratings allegations, Torrey Pines is rated and enforced as an H4/P3 site. The primary usefulness of USHPA ratings lies in their ability to match pilot skill levels with site requirements. So if a site is rated as “P3” that clearly means that someone has determined that P0, P1, and P2 pilots do NOT possess the skills needed to safely fly that site under commonly occurring or commonly expected conditions. Furthermore, the USHPA SOPs state very clearly the “Recommended Operating Limitations” for each rating:

  P0: “It is highly recommended that all flights be made under the direct
        supervision of a USHPA Certified Basic or Advanced Instructor. ”

  P1: “It is highly recommended that all flights be made under the direct
        supervision of a USHPA Certified Basic or Advanced Paragliding Instructor.”
        “Should fly appropriate sites for this skill level.”

Both of those use the phrase “under the direct supervision” of a USHPA instructor. The word “direct” is very clear. If you look up the word “direct” at wiktionary.org, you'll find that its first definition is:

    1. Straight, constant, without interruption. ( https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/direct )

In other words, both the P0 and P1 rating come with a USHPA Recommended Limitation that ALL flights be conducted under the straight, constant, and uninterrupted supervision of a USHPA instructor.

Furthermore, it is either stated (P1) or implied as obvious (P0) that pilots must fly appropriate sites for their rated skill level. Again, what other relationship could we assign between pilot ratings and site ratings?

The Torrey Pines Gliderport has been rated as a “P3” site for at least 10 years. Now we all know that instructors can use their judgment to allow pilots with less of a rating to fly at a site with a higher rating. But such an exception places the burden on the instructor to ensure that all such rating exceptions are conducted safely. It cannot be the student's responsibility because the student has already been determined not to possess the skill and judgment to fly the site. When an instructor allows a student to fly at a site above the student's rating, the instructor is using the instructor's own judgment (on conditions, weather, crowding, etc) to “make up the difference” between the student's own skills and the skills needed to fly the site safely. Again, there can be no other relationship that makes sense.

That explanation formed the core of my testimony in the Hamby case, and I stand firmly behind it. The bulk of the March 20th Palmaz letter (items 9a through 9o) attempts to discredit that core by attacking a number of my related statements. I have addressed them all in my “by the numbers” response above and I stand behind those statements as well.

USHPA's Purpose

As mentioned earlier, I have requested the citation for any specific USHPA bylaws or SOPs that I've been accused of violating. So far the only response has been Bylaws Section 4 paragraph iv:

Expulsion of the member based on the good faith determination by the Board of Directors or a committee designated to make such determination that the member has failed in a material and serious degree to observe the rules of conduct governing this corporation as promulgated by the Board from time to time or has engaged in conduct materially and seriously prejudicial to the purposes and interests of the corporation.


Since no rules of conduct have been cited, this leaves the only remaining clause to be:

“has engaged in conduct materially and seriously prejudicial to the purposes and interests of the corporation.”


This brings up the question of what are the purposes and interests of the Corporation. Article I Section 2 of the Bylaws state this:

The primary purposes of the Association are to engage in the development, study and use of hang gliders and the sport of hang gliding; to make available and disseminate knowledge about hang gliders and hang gliding; to promote the organization of meets and competition for the flying of hang gliders; to select pilots for national and international competition; to promote the training and rating of students interested in learning the art of hang gliding; and to promote safety and safe flying practices. As used in these Bylaws, the term “hang gliding” encompasses all fuel-less flight systems and aircraft capable of being launched by human power alone.


My actions over the past 7 years have been in perfect alignment with those stated purposes. Let me list a few that come to mind:

  1. Creation of the Torrey Hawks Hang Gliding Club in 2007.
  2. Creation of the US Hawks Hang Gliding Association in 2010.
  3. Assistance in creating and promoting new USHPA Chapters in the United States.
  4. Design and use of “Little Hawk” as an outreach tool for the general public.
  5. Efforts to provide oversight at Torrey Pines to promote the fair use of hang gliders.
  6. Efforts to provide oversight at Torrey Pines to promote safety and safe flying practices.
  7. Efforts to obtain site insurance at Torrey Pines to further ensure our continued use of that site.
  8. Efforts to promote hang gliding by honoring our history via the ongoing Otto meets.

I'm sure that's not the full list, and you can find more at the US Hawks web site http://ushawks.org/.

Furthermore, and more to the point, it remains to be seen whether the actions that USHPA is claiming are “prejudicial to the purposes and interests of the corporation” might indeed turn out to be exactly what the corporation (and the sport in general) needs most right now. It could be easily argued that my efforts to obtain oversight at Torrey Pines would have prevented the Hamby accident by putting the concessionaire under closer scrutiny. It could easily be argued that my efforts at oversight might have prevented the obscene abuse of the FAA's tandem exemption demonstrated by the Brad Geary and Max Marien flights shown on the video. In other words, there is no clear or “materially” evident conclusion whether my actions are prejudicial to the corporation or in its best interests. Indeed, USHPA member #5, Joe Faust has publicly called for Presidential awards for my efforts. While I wouldn't go so far as to justify that at this time, Joe makes the very clear point that the view of my actions is highly subjective.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I assert that I have not violated any of the SOPs, Bylaws, or any other rules of USHPA that would justify my expulsion. I hereby request that this hearing make that determination. The Presidential Citation can come later.


Attachment A wrote:From: Richard Hass
To: Bob Kuczewski
Cc: Martin Palmaz
Subject: Re: Request for Materials and Time for Review
Date: 04/16/2015 09:58:43 AM

In response to your request for additional time, you are reminded; you were given 33 days notice from the date of Martin’s notice. USHPA bylaws require 10 days notice (15 days notice of the expulsion date minus 5 days between the hearing and the expulsion date). You have already been given 3X the required advance notice.

Although USHPA believes Martin’s letter satisfies the notice requirements and provides sufficient detail in order for you to respond to the claims, USHPA provided you with considerably more detail in the memo you received earlier this week. While the memo provides additional detail to the claims already of record as you requested; it doesn’t add any new claims.

USHPA believes you have been given more than adequate time to prepare your response. Accordingly, USHPA will adhere to the April 22nd scheduled hearing date and deadlines previously established.


Attachment B wrote:http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41619&start=361

Mgforbes
Thu, Apr 16 2015, 9:29:56 pm
Nothing to fear (except bagpipes)

Bob's already had three times the required notice. There was nothing new in the most recent communication to him, just an emphasis on the questions that will be asked and a request that he come up with credible answers (if such there are) for those questions. He has had PLENTY of time. I said up at the top of this thread, weeks ago, that he needed to focus on making his case to the board of directors, instead of trying to stir up "popular support" for his cause. Apparently he has not taken that advice.

We don't want to drag this on forever. My personal opinion is that Bob's stalling, and he can continue stalling right up to the hearing next Wednesday. After that the board will consider what he has to say for himself and make a final decision on whether to expel him. If he has cogent arguments for why his behavior has not been materially and seriously prejudicial to USHPA and its interests, then he can make those arguments to the board. I'm sure that among the many pages he has written here he can come up with some excerpts to support his position.

If Bob can come up with some convincing arguments in his favor, I will take careful note of them as I make my own decision on his expulsion. I'm sure that other BOD members will do likewise. It is the board's job to determine what is, and what is not, action prejudicial to USHPA and its interests. That's a subjective determination, not a bright-line reading of some clause in an SOP. That is what the board is charged to do, under our Bylaws and under California corporate law. It is one of the responsibilities and duties that we accept when we are elected ''by the members'' to serve as directors. The members have delegated to us the task of managing the association, which on occasion includes disciplinary actions against individual members.

The Bylaws have been that way since USHPA was founded. This is not some sort of unusual language written into them to "get" BobK. Private membership associations, of which USHPA is one, have the right and the duty to determine whether someone is fit for membership, and the duty to deny membership or expel a member if they decide a person does not meet their standards. Those can include subjective standards such as taking actions which cause harm to the Association, as determined by the board.

To take an absurd example, if the board decided that I was harming USHPA by playing bagpipes outside the office in Colorado, they could vote to expel me from USHPA. "We can't get the membership cards processed with all that caterwauling going on!" That's materially and seriously prejudicial (in an absurd sense) because it causes expense and annoyance to our staff (earplugs, etc) and interferes with our ability to provide member services. The office staff would have already asked me politely to stop, and I would have refused. (And played even louder.) The board would have asked me to go somewhere else, and I would have loudly proclaimed that it's a public sidewalk and they can't keep me from practicing there. The police would have been called, and asked me nicely to move along, and maybe even cited me with a noise complaint after a repeat performance. And the next day, I'd be right back there again making a racket outside Beth's window, "asserting my rights as a citizen". Eventually a restraining order would be filed, USHPA's board would vote to expel me, and I'd either get arrested and jailed for violating the order or I'd finally go elsewhere. And then Beth could get some peace and quiet, at last.

I've always wanted to learn to play the bagpipes…

MGF


Attachment C wrote:From: Bill Bolosky
To: Bob Kuczewski
Subject: RE: USHPA Voting
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:05:33 +0000

:

We had a long discussion about recording votes at the beginning of the meeting. Roughly two things happened. First, Dave Broyles brought a motion that would have prevented me from recording the names of any voting directors unless I was required to do so by the rules. If it had passed, I wouldn’t have been able to record the names of people voting no on a voice motion, for example. I brought a motion to have Dave’s motion voted on by roll call, which passed. So the roll call vote you see at the beginning of the minutes shows the five directors who wanted to make it harder to record people’s names.

We then went on to discussing my idea of keeping track of the people who came and went. Somehow this managed to get to a final vote before I was able to make a motion to use a roll call (which I suspect was mostly my fault rather than a scheme by Rich or anything). There were a total of 20 directors at the meeting (more showed up later). Dan Tomlinson had left the room, so there were 19 voting. It tied at 9-9, which left the president to break the tie. He voted no, and that was that. I’m really sorry that I didn’t get the roll call motion in for this vote, it was a big mistake. So, roughly, you know five of the 10 people who voted no: the five who voted yes on Broyles’ motion, minus Tomlinson plus Hass. I know that Mark and I voted yes. What I don’t know (and again apologize for) is who the other five were.

--B





Here's the call-in letter that I got from USHPA:

Mr. Kuczewski,

Your expulsion hearing is scheduled for 6pm Pacific Time on Wednesday, April 22nd. You must use the call-in information provided below to attend the hearing. This is a unique login. Once you provide the confirmation number, an operator will verify your name and place you into the call.

Dial-In: 1 (877) 615-4340 US Toll Free / Confirmation Number: Removed

The board has had the opportunity to review the materials referenced in the letter to you, notifying you of the hearing. They have also been provided a copy of your written response and have had the opportunity to review the materials referenced in your response. The board has had ample time to review all of the materials and the hearing will not involve presentations of those materials again at the hearing. Neither the notification letter, nor your response will be read aloud by the board at your hearing.

As noted in the hearing notice, you have been provided the opportunity to present your evidence and arguments in writing. USHPA will not be asking or answering questions or presenting oral evidence at the hearing—all of the evidence has already been submitted for the board's review in writing. You may, however, present your argument about what you believe that evidence shows orally at the hearing. In your written response, you indicated that you did not intend to speak at the hearing. The choice of whether you will speak at the hearing is entirely up to you. Should you change your mind between now and the hearing, you will still be allowed to speak and you will be allotted 30 minutes for your presentation

Following the close of your presentation, the board will undertake its deliberations. The deliberations will be open to you and all interested USHPA members to listen.



Thanks,

Martin Palmaz

USHPA Executive Director


Please feel free to register (if needed) and post your thoughts below.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding Public Forum

Postby JoeF » Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:55 pm

A request for a Press Pass has been sent to hearing formers:


PressPassRequestApril22of2015.png
PressPassRequestApril22of2015.png (72.17 KiB) Viewed 5804 times
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4575
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: USHPA Expulsion Proceeding

Postby dhmartens » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:20 pm

Accusation of USHPA is a front as FAA sub organization and interstate narcotic drug cartel trafficker.

against: Felipe Amunategui

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1787&start=10


The USHPA minutes go on to reflect that after Tim Herr's presentation, Felipe Amunátegui introduced a motion to terminate my membership. Felipe's motion was seconded by Bill Belcourt. Here's the vote:


here is his unsecured youtube account liked videos:
http://www.youtube.com/user/1flyndoc/vi ... &flow=grid

Actual evidence of two liked videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Xe6G8Vpr9s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV2o9braEcg


Bobs removal is motivated by an interstate narcotics organization posing and an FAA sub company.

He should be extradited to Texas where he would be put on death row for public execution.
http://empirenews.net/texas-judge-sente ... ossession/

please forgive TOS violation as it is direct evidence and important.
Doug Martens
dhmartens
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:28 pm
Location: Reseda California

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests

Options

Return to Hang Gliding General