Sign in, say "hi", ... and be welcomed.

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby Rick Masters » Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 am

Hang glider : MK1 SPLITWING CIRCA (Tony Prentice)
archived on Delta Club 82 http://www.delta-club-82.com/bible/photo.php?id_aile=830&langue=en
use ctrl+ to zoom in; ctrl - to zoom out
Image
Image
Image
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby Rick Masters » Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:45 am

What we hang glider pilots imagine we could do:
Image

How birds see us:
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby brianscharp » Tue Sep 08, 2015 10:34 am

Did any MK1 SPLITWINGs make it to the USA? I either saw one or a wing very similar at the Point of the Mountain.
brianscharp
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby ARP » Tue Sep 08, 2015 11:34 am

Brian,

The Splitwing was only an experimental glider and did not go into production although a number of variants were built. What you may have seen was the Whitney Porta-wing which also had a cruciform airframe with just one sail:- http://www.hanggliding.org/whitney-port ... 47834.html

It does show how small that glider could be packed and was very light weight.

Tony
ARP
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby brianscharp » Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:10 pm

Thanks Tony,

It was most likely one of the variants than. The only difference I can remember was it may have had a little less aspect ratio, but it definitely had the slotted sail. I only got to see it briefly one time.
brianscharp
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby Frank Colver » Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:47 pm

When I picked up the Port-a-Wing my impression was that it was heavy. But then I was comparing it to the "standard Rogollos" of the day which typically weighed in at 30 to 40 lbs (40 lb was at the heavy end of the spectrum, at that time).

It's performance in the air also looked very scary and I would not stand under the flight path if I was standing on the hillside. I was not the only person who felt that way about the Port-a-Wing.

Frank C.

BTW - My Skysail weighed about 75 lbs and many other HG pilots would tell me that nobody, in years to come, was going to want to fly a 75 lb hang glider just to get higher performance.
Frank Colver
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1292
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 11:21 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby ARP » Tue Sep 08, 2015 1:11 pm

brianscharp wrote:Thanks Tony,

It was most likely one of the variants than. The only difference I can remember was it may have had a little less aspect ratio, but it definitely had the slotted sail. I only got to see it briefly one time.



Not one of my gliders. May be someone produced a hang glider based on the Platz sailwing (1923) as this one made for the Red Bull Flug tag. :- http://www.delta-club-82.com/bible/cher ... le-P-k.htm
ARP
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby ARP » Tue Sep 08, 2015 1:21 pm

fcolver wrote:When I picked up the Port-a-Wing my impression was that it was heavy. But then I was comparing it to the "standard Rogollos" of the day which typically weighed in at 30 to 40 lbs (40 lb was at the heavy end of the spectrum, at that time).

It's performance in the air also looked very scary and I would not stand under the flight path if I was standing on the hillside. I was not the only person who felt that way about the Port-a-Wing.

Frank C.

BTW - My Skysail weighed about 75 lbs and many other HG pilots would tell me that nobody, in years to come, was going to want to fly a 75 lb hang glider just to get higher performance.



Frank, I only saw one Whitney Porta-wing fly and I would concur with your comments on it. It used larger tubing than a standard Rogallo type of the day but at about 40lbs much lighter than current gliders. It did assemble quickly with pip pins built into each section and it all went into a hold all for carrying.
ARP
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby brianscharp » Tue Sep 08, 2015 3:30 pm

ARP wrote:Not one of my gliders. May be someone produced a hang glider based on the Platz sailwing (1923) as this one made for the Red Bull Flug tag. :-

Maybe, but it ended up looking more like yours. I wonder if it could have been a copy of your wing.
brianscharp
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: Should we try a different way? Designwise....

Postby ARP » Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:06 pm

Brian,

There were photos of it available in the 70's so it is possible someone reverse engineered it. It's a relatively simple design with just a keel, wing spar, A frame , king post and a fair few cables. The jib & mainsail could have been made on a home sewing machine.

Did you see it fly and what year would it have been ?

Tony
ARP
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:46 am

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

Options

Return to Hang Gliding General