Change font size
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 7:51 am


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 8 posts ]
Author Message
 Post subject: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:01 am 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8517
Location: San Diego, CA
Tomorrow (October 27th, 2015), the San Diego City Council will vote on an amendment to the City's Trespassing Ordinance. Since 1977 the trespassing ordinance has contained an exception that always allowed:

      "peaceful picketing directed toward the business establishment"
      "peaceful political activities"

The new ordinance removes those provisions. Here's the title which describes the municipal code section being amended: I've also attached the PDF file containing the proposed changes below.

Quote:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE 2,
DIVISION 00 OF THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE BY
AMENDING SECTION 52.80.01 RELATING TO TRESPASS
AND EXCEPTIONS THERETO.


Attachments:
Ordinance_Strikeout_2016-18_86413610262015090510962.PDF [220.55 KiB]
Downloaded 592 times

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:12 am 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4688
It seems to focus on the picketing ON THE BUSINESS PROPERTY.
Picketing just OUTSIDE the property seems not to be the target of the change.

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:47 pm 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8517
Location: San Diego, CA
Here's the California State Statute (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=00001-01000&file=840-848):

Quote:
602.1. (a) Any person who intentionally interferes with any lawful business or occupation carried on by the owner or agent of a business establishment open to the public, by obstructing or intimidating those attempting to carry on business, or their customers, and who refuses to leave the premises of the business establishment after being requested to leave by the owner or the owner's agent, or by a peace officer acting at the request of the owner or owner's agent, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to 90 days, or by a fine of up to four hundred dollars ($400), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
(b) Any person who intentionally interferes with any lawful business carried on by the employees of a public agency open to the public, by obstructing or intimidating those attempting to carry on business, or those persons there to transact business with the public agency, and who refuses to leave the premises of the public agency after being requested to leave by the office manager or a supervisor of the public agency, or by a peace officer acting at the request of the office manager or a supervisor of the public agency, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to 90 days, or by a fine of up to four hundred dollars ($400), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
(c) This section shall not apply to any of the following persons:
(1) Any person engaged in lawful labor union activities that are permitted to be carried out on the property by state or federal law.
(2) Any person on the premises who is engaging in activities protected by the California Constitution or the United States Constitution.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to supersede the application of any other law.


The state law is very clear that there has to be intentional interference, obstruction, intimidation.

The San Diego ordinance doesn't have those elements but makes exceptions for protesting a business and political speech. Those exceptions are what they're removing.

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:54 am 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 4688
"the premises"

If San Diego approves the strike outs, will one still be able
outside the premises be able to picket peacefully a business?
Seems as though such off-premises political action is protected
by federal rights.
UNFAIR TREATMENT OF SPORTS! INEQUITABLE FEES!
INSUFFICIENT EXPOSURE OF THE FATALITIES OF PG !
UNJUST GRAB OF FEDERAL AIRSPACE!
FALSE GRAB OF "CONTROL" OVER UNCONTROLLED AIRSPACE!

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:17 pm 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8517
Location: San Diego, CA
The San Diego City Council approved the language as it was. I suspect it was predetermined, and that's part of a bigger problem in San Diego.

_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:50 pm 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 469
Location: Reseda California
This is likely about Sea World as protests are growing but the SD city councile cannot stop social media.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertain ... video.html

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13318532 ... g-ban.html

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/peop ... /73537582/

http://www.malibutimes.com/blogs/youtub ... c3b8e.html

http://www.peta.org/features/bob-barker ... -seaworld/

http://www.billboard.com/articles/colum ... orld-video

I will likely release a forum attack on Halloween with more information.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 3:22 pm 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 187
Now let's hear Bob telling the San Diego City Council why the new trespassing law is not necessary.





Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Council to Vote on New Trespass Law
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 5:41 pm 
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 469
Location: Reseda California
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 8 posts ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
610nm Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net