Sign in, say "hi", ... and be welcomed.

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby DarthVader » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:21 pm

I really don't know the answer. I really don't know if there's enough interest to build a new organization. But I will always know that I did my best. Sometimes that's the only reward.


I am for it! Isn't it time for a change?

There are lots of patriots who support the USHPA and there are alot that do not, such as myself, my reason what is the use in paying if I can not even get a rating, what have they done for me. Shouldn't they investigate why their new members aren't climbing the stairway to heaven? After all I was paying them for what? To be a member of what? If I cannot even fly their sites or for that matter having smoke blown up my butt by a wanna be instructor that can't even fly himself. The sleepwalkers will not sleep forever... Among all the other good ol' boys suff going on behind the smoke screen at the USHPA... What's it gonna take? They ain't trying to hear it, you can write them all you want and they may even do a Wacko Jacko move Like it did me, Al's "The bad guy." So... that makes him Good? Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones it's been waiting for. We are the change that it seeks.
DarthVader
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:30 pm

DarthVader wrote:Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones it's been waiting for. We are the change that it seeks.

Hi Al,

That's very well written. I've never thought about the change seeking us. Thanks for that great quote!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

By the way,we've been getting several new members a day now!! Thanks for your contribution to that growth. :clap: :clap: :clap:

Bob Kuczewski
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby TadEareckson » Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:41 am

I don't think there's a serious shortage of new members climbing the stairway to heaven. Jeremiah Thompson, Bill Priday, Roy Messing, Tony Ameo, John Seward, Lemmy Lopez, and Shane Smith come to mind as examples from the past half dozen years.

mlbco - 2010/03/31

In 2009 there were several serious hang gliding accidents involving pilots on the HG forum (or who had close friends on the forum that reported that these accidents had occurred). In each case there was an immediate outcry from forum members not to discuss these accidents, usually referring to the feelings of the pilots' families as a reason to not do so. In each case it was claimed that the facts would eventually come out and a detailed report would be presented and waiting for this to happen would result in a better informed pilot population and reduce the amount of possibly harmful speculation.

In each of these cases I have never seen a final detailed accident report presented in this forum. So far as I can tell, the accident reporting system that has been assumed to exist here doesn't exist at all, the only reports I've seen are those published in the USHPA magazine. They are so stripped down, devoid of contextual information and important facts that in many cases I have not been able to match the magazine accident report with those mentioned in this forum.

The end result has been that effective accident reporting is no longer taking place in the USHPA magazine or in this forum. Am I the only one who feels this way?

Steve

Don't seem to be doing much of a job investigating why they ARE either. Of course it might be a bit embarrassing to the responsible parties if they did.
TadEareckson
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:07 am

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby TadEareckson » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:23 am

Another vote for civility.

I'm a HUGE fan of civility. The problem is that it's just not very effective when you're trying to discuss things with serial killers and their legions of adoring zombies.

You have much good information but it gets lost in the bile and brimstone.

If you want easily accessible total crap information floating in pools of friendliness and civility then pick up a copy of Towing Aloft and discuss it with the "instructors" at Wallaby, Quest, Lookout, Manquin, Ridgely, Cloud 9, Whitewater, Jackson Hole, You Name It.

I know Diev and he is not an asshole.

Diev Hart - 2009/12/02
Santa Cruz

I'm AT...

..."well now if you had my mouth release this would have never even been an issue"...

The same goes for the finger string on the basetube release for that matter...
good job in getting the gear out and down...

Here is the check list we use...but as you see it does not check for pilot holding onto cart (it would/should go in section "d" below")

"HIERTow" prelaunch checklist:

a. Hang check: carabiner closed and locked, in leg loops, harness closed (leg doors open), hang height verified, chute and helmet secured, no loose lines or cords.

b. Instrument check: instruments, other personal equipment secured, turned on and zeroed.

c. Equipment check: overview scan of glider (this does NOT replace a careful preflight!!) and launch cart.

d. Release check: check weak link, release function, bridle line routing (over the base tube and not twisted), location of hook knife.

e. Tow check: Verify no loose parachute, or loose lines or cords (especially VG lines or harness cords) that could get caught on the launch cart.

Note wind speed and direction, scan for traffic in pattern, mentally prepare for tow and emergency actions.

Beg to differ.

Background...

The "AT" he's mocking is "AeroTow" whom Jack had banned twenty-two days prior for making too many valid points. AeroTow was the screen name that Tad Eareckson used after a technical glitch prevented him from using his real name - or anything resembling it.

To see Diev's comments in context go to:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14663

He is a careful pilot.

He is neither careful nor a pilot. He's a dangerous glider driver who doesn't know what he's doing or talking about and is happy engaging in absolutely deadly illegal practices 'cause everybody else in his stupid herd is doing the same thing.

I use the word "pilot" very sparingly. It might be difficult for me to name as many as a dozen in all of hang gliding - worldwide.

Most of the releases I have seen have some sort of trick or gotcha to operate them.

That's 'cause their virtually all "designed" by idiot glider drivers who throw into the air whatever junk they can coat-hanger together in half an hour or less and proclaim to be the pinnacle of human achievement if someone survives two or three flights in a row on them.

Steve Kinsley - 1996/05/09

Personal opinion. While I don't know the circumstances of Frank's death and I am not an awesome tow type dude, I think tow releases, all of them, stink on ice. Reason: You need two hands to drive a hang glider. You 'specially need two hands if it starts to turn on tow. If you let go to release, the glider can almost instantly assume a radical attitude. We need a release that is held in the mouth. A clothespin. Open your mouth and you're off.

And that's pretty much exactly what Steve developed and put into the air in under nine years. And that's the device that Diev, Davis, Adam Elchin, Ryan, and untold multitudes of other wastes of space delight so much in mocking and denigrating.

What Diev does with his release seems to be SOP with that particular release.

bulls***.

1. You - LEGALLY anyway - don't get to tow with an SOP for a PARTICULAR release.

The United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc.
Standard Operating Procedure
12. Rating System
02. Pilot Proficiency System
10. Hang Gliding Aerotow Ratings
-B. Aero Vehicle Requirements

06. A release must be placed at the hang glider end of the tow line within easy reach of the pilot. This release shall be operational with zero tow line force up to twice the rated breaking strength of the weak link.

Does ANYBODY bother to even GLANCE at this stuff? Let alone make the slightest PRETENSE of complying with it? I just posted it five entries before your last IN THIS THREAD ferchrisake.

2. And he's not even "SOP with that particular" piece o' crap.

The new GT aerotow release, new as of July 11th 2009, is designed to be used with a V bridle and a 13O-pound green stripe Dacron tournament fishing line weak link. At this time it is not recommended to use this release with a higher value weak link. We are confident that with an ultimate load of 130 pounds at the release point, the new GT aerotow release works better than all cable releases that we have experience with.

Well, maybe he is.

Sleazebag Matt is only saying that "we" - which means "I" - are/am CONFIDENT that at 130 pounds direct loading it works BETTER THAN all CABLE releases that we/I have EXPERIENCE WITH.

Which could - and DOES - mean that he THINKS that at 226 pounds towline tension one occasionally MIGHT be able to pry it open after half a dozen adrenalin enhanced pulls on the loop. Not necessarily that it's POSSIBLE.

He THINKS much better than the only other CABLE release that HE has experience with. Which would be Lookout Version 1.0:

Ralph Sickinger - 2000/08/26

After towing to altitude, Sunny waved me off; I pulled on the release (hard), but nothing happened! After the second failed attempt to release, I thought about releasing from the secondary, but before I could move my hand the tug stalled and started to fall; Sunny had no choice but to gun the engine in attempt to regain flying speed, but this resulted in a sudden and severe pull on the harness and glider; I was only able to pull on the release again, while simultaneously praying for the weak link to break. The release finally opened, and I was free of the tug.

Whitewater - 2009/08/31

Approximately ten emergency vehicles were parked all over the runway.

The EMTs were carrying a pilot out from under the wreckage of a hang glider next to the runway. They loaded the victim/stretcher into an ambulance, but didn't drive away. Stayed parked on the runway for at least a half an hour. I don't yet know what the outcome was.

Later heard that he was evacuated by helicopter because of a head injury.

I once rode a tow to the ground because I could not get it to release.

Good thing you weren't rolled, huh? I've known real well a couple guys who did the same thing who were.

Promptly quit towing for years afterward.

Small world... So did they. Promptly quit breathing too - so don't expect them to be getting back into things anytime soon.

Your release has no tricks or gotchas?

Nope. 'Cept like ANY two point system there's always a possibility of the bridle wrapping at the tow ring. But I've minimized the likelihood and have systems to automatically and/or instantly deal with it while maintaining uncompromised control of the glider.

Do up a site, explain it at a 4th grade level and keep it fit for a family Sunday dinner conversation..

1. Assuming that I HAVEN'T set up sites? You haven't spent a whole lot of time or effort researching me or this issue, have you?

2. Hang gliding, for the most part, is an EXTREMELY family unfriendly activity.

3. If you wanna listen to a lot of lies, get highly rewarded for stupidity and NOT thinking, be imbued with a lot of bigotry and intolerance for honest people who DO think, and get a surefire ticket to Heaven then - based upon my own experience - I highly recommend Sunday school to you.

4. If you wanna increase the likelihood of returning home for a G rated family Sunday dinner conversation after a day of flying and delay the one way solo trip to Heaven for as long as possible, then I highly recommend you listen to people who know what the hell they're doing and talking about and not be overly picky about how they're saying things.

Before I do another fourth grade level explanation of my system for about the ten billionth time I'd appreciate it if you would first take a look at my photo site:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrel ... 141352219/

And make half an effort to understand what's going on. Antoine (deltaman) has been doing that and going through the documentation at:

http://www.energykitesystems.net/Lift/h ... index.html

with great success - and English ain't his first/native language.

After that I'll be more than happy to walk you through anything you might be having trouble with.

P.S.

1. How unpredictable and unremediable was the release failure that locked you to the line and - for the purpose of the exercise - killed you on that tow?

2. How "civil" was the person who set/sent you up with it?
TadEareckson
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:07 am

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby TadEareckson » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:09 am

It is always a good Idea to study the landscape where you plan to land before you even think of launching a hang glider

1. ANY landscape on which you plan to land (or don't) is capable of killing you.

2. Waterscapes tend to be a lot more forgiving - as long as your face remains above them. Otherwise they tend to be a lot LESS forgiving.

If it is possible to land standing then I will...

Just 'cause it may be POSSIBLE - which it almost always is - doesn't always make it a great idea.

Lauren Tjaden - 2008/12/31

came in with no wind after an hour and had right wing drop. instead of wrestling gilder straight i tried to flare while desperately trying to straighten.

bad bad whack. horrible pain, i could not move. screaming with pain, literally. took a very long time to get me out and to the hospital.

And that's at an airport - not a narrow dry river bed with large rocks strewn all over the place or field filled with seven foot high corn.

...there is nothing wrong with a wheel landing.

So can I put you down as being OK with the way sailplanes, ultralights, Cessnas, passenger planes, crop dusters, stunt planes, carrier jets do it?

LAND HOWEVER YOU CAN

That's what John Simon, Lauren, and Sparky did. Not so sure that's great advice. I'd tend to go with:

---
For any given situation, land as SAFELY as you can.
---

That's pretty much always gonna be on the wheels.

AS LONG AS YOU GET TO THE GROUND SAFE

'Cept for Rooney passengers and others who go into the powerlines, EVERYBODY gets TO the ground safely.
TadEareckson
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:07 am

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:14 am

miguel wrote:Another vote for civility.

Segments of Tad's reply:

TadEareckson wrote:I'm a HUGE fan of civility.
  :
... serial killers ... legions of adoring zombies ... crap ... asshole ... dangerous ... absolutely deadly ... illegal practices ... stupid herd ... idiot glider drivers ... junk ... coat-hanger together ... multitudes of other wastes of space ... bulls*** ... ferchrisake ... crap ... Sleazebag Matt ... a lot of lies ... stupidity ... bigotry ... intolerance

You're a HUGE fan of civility Tad? Really?

Tad, maybe you just don't see those words that you write. But to some folks ... that's all they see. You have your own sensitivities to certain words. Can you see that others might find your words offensive?

Miguel was right on target:

miguel wrote:You have much good information but it gets lost in the bile and brimstone.

He also says he knows Diev:

miguel wrote:I know Diev and he is not an asshole. He is a careful pilot.

Tad, your quote of Diev doesn't disprove Miguel's statement for me. Do you know Diev beyond what he posts? Have you met him or even talked to him on the phone? If so, how often?

I don't think I know Diev (I've met a lot of pilots and I'm sorry if I don't remember him), but his posts haven't struck me as someone deserving to be blasted as you've done. What's the worst thing that you've seen him post anywhere that justifies calling him such names?

Tad, I think you've got a lot of good ideas, but Miguel is right that it gets lost in the bile and brimstone. I'm not trying to blast you here. I'm trying to help you be more effective. I think that's what Miguel and others want as well. Please take these suggestions as constructive criticism. Thanks.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby TadEareckson » Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:42 pm

... serial killers ... legions of adoring zombies.... crap ... asshole ... dangerous ... absolutely deadly ... illegal practices ... stupid herd ... idiot glider drivers ... junk ... coat-hanger together ... multitudes of other wastes of space ... bulls*** ... ferchrisake ... crap ... Sleazebag Matt ... a lot of lies ... stupidity ... bigotry ... intolerance

1. How much of that is inaccurate?

2. Some of it's subjective, some of it ain't.

3. "asshole" was taken from a quote from miguel. (Although, yeah, I'm totally cool with the characterization in that context.)

But to some folks ... that's all they see.

Yeah, probably not a great idea for those folk to be flying. PILOTS always hafta be looking at the BIG and WHOLE pictures and constantly assessing where the REAL threats are coming from. I can name you lotsa fatal crashes which were direct consequences of tunnel vision.

You have your own sensitivities to certain words.

Not in the slightest. I always look at the context and intent.

Why can't you see that others might find your words offensive?

Who says I can't see it? Anywhere you go where people have keyboards somebody's gonna punch out a combination that somebody else is gonna find offensive. Free speech is a real bitch that way.

Well it's all right now.
I've learned my lesson well.
...

Miguel was right on target...

1. And yet people seem to have so much fun with crossword puzzles. Go figure.

2. Maybe the bile and brimstone are some of the most important parts of the message. Certainly manage to draw in and motivate the crowds in lotsa churches. Hasn't done bad in getting lotsa a people long stays in the White House either.

Tad, your quote of Diev doesn't disprove Miguel's statement for me.

OK, I'll be happy to walk you through it.

Do you know Diev beyond what he posts?

Nope, that's all I ever need.

...but his posts haven't struck me as someone deserving to be blasted as you've done.

You haven't been to as many tow funerals as I have.

What's the worst thing that you've seen him post anywhere that justifies calling him such names?

The WORST thing? Please don't ask me to pick favorites. Let's just do 'em all.

I'm AT (Tad)...

..."well now if you had my mouth release this would have never even been an issue"...

The same goes for the finger string on the basetube release for that matter...

01. I don't like being mocked - especially by incompetent twits.

02. I don't have a "mouth release". I like to take off, fly, land, and break down with my mouth right where it's been for most of my flying career - lower front part of my head.

03. I have a Four-String Secondary/Emergency Release with a trigger line I hold in my teeth until I clear two hundred feet. It could spell instant death if I blew it out of sequence so it's highly unlikely that I'd do that in that - or ANY - situation.

04. I DO have a lanyard between the fingers of my left hand which will blow the primary if you twitch it. Believe it or not, that can be a good thing when you're three seconds away from lockout death.

05. Steve Elliott died on 2009/01/03 after a dolly related problem for the sole reason that his crap Davis style release wouldn't allow him to abort the tow any better than Davis could on 2004/08/02 during a dolly related problem with crap Davis and crap Wallaby style releases.

06. So I don't think this issue is so goddam funny.

http://ozreport.com/pub/fingerlakesaccident.shtml

07. 'Cept, of course, when it's Davis getting his face rearranged.

08. This glider DOES have a basetube mounted release lever and thus - in theory anyway - CAN be blown off tow at any moment after the driver makes the decision and reacts.

09. But release is neither called for nor appropriate in this situation so the issue of actuator accessibility is completely irrelevant anyway

10. The video depicts Allen Sparks - not someone of whom I hold a terribly high opinion, as a flyer or person, and a buddy of Rooney's:

a) being pulled off the dolly at a little under normal launch speed as a consequence of having neglected to grasp the hold-downs;

b) lightly kissing the dirt runway with the wheels at the bottom of a shallow dip;

c) becoming airborne just fine as if nothing had happened;

d) but then blowing his idiot 130 pound Greenspot loop weak link under normal tow tension - under half a G; and

e) rotating to the downtubes for a late inadequate flare resulting in an all out run behind the glider with a dropped basetube to finish things off.

11. Sparky's equipped with a backup suspension strap and Quallaby (spinnaker shackle, cable, brake lever, velcro) two point aerotow release anchored at the carabiner and UNDOUBTEDLY a Bailey bent pin secondary / backup release (when you've got a Quallaby at the top the release at the bottom must be considered a backup) or two, standard crap primary bridle with no thimble at the bottom, standard overlength crap secondary bridle between his shoulders, and single loop 130 pound Greenspot weak link at the top end of the primary bridle. I know I'm gonna piss off and alienate just about everyone with this statement but every single one of those items is a badge of incompetence.

Hang check

12. I got news for ya... If you're dolly launching - and if you're NOT dolly launching for aerotow you're an idiot - you're gonna be doing a hang check whether you want to or not.

carabiner closed...

13. Good.

...and locked

14. Bad. Locked carabiners and the mechanism which locks them ONLY make hang gliding MORE dangerous.

in leg loops

15. Good, but in dolly launched aerotowing they really don't matter much. They're not gonna make ANY difference at launch and if you do a good landing - which means staying prone or close to it down into ground effect - they're not gonna make a helluva lot of difference at that end of the flight either.

harness closed...

16. Meaning buckled. Good but the ONLY time it MAY matter is in a hard parachute opening shock.

(leg doors open)

17. If you're flying without wheels - and unless you've got a REAL GOOD reason for flying without wheels (like going for an XC or consecutive loops record) - you're an idiot, OK.

18. Otherwise... Zip up the pod like I do. If it's a good operation (which it isn't) the ONLY reason you're gonna hafta do an emergency landing is an engine failure at launch. And even then you're safer just rolling in than trying to do a bunch of bulls*** gymnastics like Sparky managed to pull off almost passably.

19. Even if you don't have wheels bellying in is probably the safer landing option.

hang height verified

20. Yeah, it might have changed since last weekend. And if you're doing a different glider/harness combo and so stupid that you need to be told to do this you WILL be finding out if you're significantly off WELL before you launch. Who cares? It's more useless clutter on an important list.

chute secured

21. Replace the pins with short lengths of eighth inch leechline which don't slide out when you breathe on them.

helmet secured

22. Who cares?

no loose lines or cords

23. Good.

Instrument check...

24. Fine. Not a safety issue.

Equipment check: overview scan of glider (this does NOT replace a careful preflight!!) and launch cart.

25. Good. Never hurts to keep checking and thinking.

release function

26. What's that mean? You're gonna load it up to weak link and see if you can pry it open?

I have had issues with them releasing under load. So I don't try to release it under a lot of load now.

You already know that just about the most critical item on the checklist so far flunks so I'm not seeing much point in bothering with a checklist at all. No problem slamming into the runway at the conclusion of your lockout - as long as you've got the helmet buckled!

check weak link

27. What's the point?

Diev Hart - 2007/07/17

I've had a weaklink break 10 ft off the cart.

You already know you're using a dangerous weak link which will fail for no reason whatsoever at the most dangerous part of a normal tow - EXACTLY like Sparky's did in the video - and WILL kill you WHEN it blows in a dangerous tow, you have no idea what a weak link is or how it translates to G rating - so why bother?

bridle line routing (over the base tube and not twisted)

28. Fine.

location of hook knife.

29. Anybody who thinks of a hook knife at the glider end as a piece of towing equipment and/or believes there is the slightest possibility of it being useful as compensation for the equipment he's using is a total idiot who has no business towing.

Verify no loose parachute

30. Didn't we do that already?

or loose lines or cords (especially VG lines or harness cords) that could get caught on the launch cart.

31. Good.

Note wind speed and direction

32. And forget thermals and dust devils. No REAL need to put ribbons along the runway 'cause...

Davis - 2000/01/12

Mike Nooy takes off to our left, and he launches right into a dust devil. Like I said, they've been coming in every ten minutes or so, and you can't see them as the paddock is pretty green.

...thermals and dust devils are rarely problems on launch.

scan for traffic in pattern

33. Fine.

...mentally prepare for tow and emergency actions.

34. Why bother? You've already decided to use a loop of Greenspot which can't reliably get you more than ten feet off the cart so you won't be able to count on staying on in any situation that demands it from under half a G and on up and you've decided to use a release that won't let you off tow in anything over a major fraction of your pathetic weak link. All you're doing is playing Russian roulette with a lot of chambers - luck based aviation. But don't worry - almost everybody gets away with it almost all of the time.

Summary/review...

Some of the most dangerous things in hang gliding are unhooked launches, understrength weak links, shitrigged releases, and standup landings. Dollies automatically take the first issue out of the equation for him but he's putting the other three together and trying to develop and promote the combination as an art form.
TadEareckson
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:07 am

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby JoeF » Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:45 pm

Have made a personal choice:
1. Http://WorldParaglidingAssociation.org/ has now only time and attention to study PDMC
2. Will no longer be a member of any club or association in hang gliding that supports the sector of paragliding.
3. Will continue investing in framed-controlled airframed hang gliders.
4. Will not renew USHPA membership at end of this month. The USHPA one day will be dropping the "H" and keep its "P", if the org survives the coming actuarial hammer over the P sector.

Joe Faust
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:41 pm

Hi Joe,

That's somewhat of a big step ... especially for USHPA #5.
Have you been a member continuously for all that time?

Bob K.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8374
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: National hang gliding association

Postby JoeF » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:53 am

bobk wrote:Hi Joe,
That's somewhat of a big step ... especially for USHPA #5.
Have you been a member continuously for all that time?
Bob K.


Bob K, Just two recent years of paid membership.

Shane,
Thank you for your question.

Paragliding in today's understanding is the use of a parachute-like non-airframed canopy with long shroud lines to the pilot; the specialized canopy is designed for gliding effectiveness; it is a form of free-flight gliding; it is mechanically a form of free-flight kiting with the pilot's mass as the resistive anchor, the set of shroud lines as kite lines, and the canopy as the lifting wing. When used for foot launch and foot landing, the system enters at the launch and landing sectors a region where natural wind helicities too frequently place the pilot with collapsed canopy or spiraling canopy without effective rescue-parachute options; the region varies, but is not avoidable. Beginners and experts alike get injured and die for lack of having a practical option in the special region called PDMC (Paragliding Dead-Man's Curve).

It has been a hopeful and exciting run of paragliding development since David Barish initiated foot-launch canopy gliding; the evolution of the paraglider has not succeeded in having a practical option for the PDMC. The industry is not facing the challenge adequately. It does not seem designers are solving the challenge; the lack of an airframed wing coupled with the shroud line mechanics forms a severe safety challenge; expert flying cannot bypass the PDMC. Organizations involved seem blind to PDMC. Participants seem on-average not to appreciate the PDMC.

So, associations and clubs that combine the paragliding with airframed-wing and airframe-controlled hang gliding will be facing the decision to stay unified or to split for independent operations; the struggle to get the two activities independent of each other will take decades; awareness of the severe distinctions between the two activities by civil authorities, the public, and free-flight dreams will be a struggle. Insurance companies will be struggling with the same challenge of distinction. Both activities frequently use the same land sites and airspace.

The ease of entering paragliding and the ease of owning, transporting, and storing paragliders in "bags" has resulted in an explosive growth of participation in paragliding. Framed hang gliders in association with paraglider are going to be actuarily affected by the injury rate and death rate stemming from the PDMC. At some point in time, involved associations will be held accountable for how they support activity that has the unavoidable PDMC with its assured injury and death rate.
See: http://www.cometclones.com/mythology2011.htm to which page WorldParaGlidingAssociation.org now points.

In some nations there is a monoply of apparent control of free-flight gliding of the foot launch type. In the USA we are not required to join any particular private sport association to paraglide or airframe-hang glide; however some launch and landing sites are controlled using property-ownership-use rights either for commerce or intended non-profit control of risks and also sporting order. The airspace has regions where one may fly either sort of vehicle without having to join any particular private corporation. Most, but not all, paragliding and airframe-hang gliding in USA is done from controlled sites where the managers of the sites are requiring users to have active membership in a private association that I helped to found. For some now, it is becoming unconscionable to be a member in a sport association that supports paragliding activity; some are struggling to have their clubs and associations be focused only on airframed hang gliders using airframe control.

Though I will deeply continue developing unmanned non-framed canopy kite systems, my personal decision is to respect the PDMC and have no further support for human-piloted free-flight frame-less sport paragliding. A consequent of this is not renewing my membership in a corporation that supports such paragliding. Controlled sites requiring active membership in a particular corporation may not be available to me; but the airspace is still legally open for flying. Sites not requiring membership in a paragliding-supporting-private corporation will be used for my launches and landings.

Also, I will continue (in synergy with other designers) to design and test framed hang gliders that aim to compete with the compactness, ease of storage, ease of transport, ease of assembly and disassembly that the unframed paraglider canopy gliders features. The momentum of the paraglider craze might one day be met by an easier-to-system-manage framed and frame-controlled hang glider. In the interim time, one may fly framed hang gliders that do not have an analogue of the PDMC.

Lift,
Joe

BCC: to others.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests

Options

Return to Hang Gliding General