Distinguish for Los Angeles County beaches the stark difference between organized events and the general non-organized recreational use of the beaches. For organized events:
http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/dbh/docs/1017709_Beach_Harbor_Use_Permit_Policy.pdf Individual recreational kiteboarder (flyer, jumper, sailor, beach running launching, beach sand practicing, air user, beach user, water user) is not an "organized" "event" but a person tethered to a wing standing on a board who intends to fly, sail, glide, move, swim via use of wind, gravity, sand, and water; he or she uses the assets of the State and County and City to do his or her recreational flying, jumping, gliding, sailing, moving, swimming while controlling his or her tether wing. Individual kiteboarders are not invited but are permitted to use the beach-water asset for his or her recreation; special Use Permits are not taken out for such individual non-event recreation; and the State and County and City are by State statute protected from ensuing kiteboarding injuries; the State, County, and City generally act to maintain properties and access to give benefits to the public per public mandates in the people's government; their maintenance of safe access is paid for by the people's taxes mostly; the maintenance actions guard the State, County, and City from being guilty of "gross negligence" when faced with a claim; the individual using the access takes on the responsibility of his or her own person; an individual may commit acts that injure other people; that individual may be held responsible for damages and injuries caused by his or her own actions. Part of the duty of the State, City, and Country is to maximize uses of funds to fulfill the mandate from the people to provide services, one of which is open recreation for individual citizens; safety is part of the deal; signage and rules are part of the commonsense way of fulfilling such mandate. The rules involved are to fulfill the mandate, not crush the intent of the mandate.
At Belmont Shore is a Belmont Kite Zone with signage holding guides and rules. At least three businesses have been permitted to give professional instruction. Instruction is generally encouraged by seasoned kiteboarding participants. But instruction may arrive by use of means other than becoming patron of one of those three businesses. And an individual recreational kiteboarder may arrive and play without paying any organized fee or event fee or instruction fee or certification fee or fee to the State, County, or City; generally the individual is probably, but not always, a citizen who has paid his or her taxes to be spent toward the open recreational system of the State, County, or City; he or she is included as party in the State of California recreational land-use statute that protects landowners and their agents when uninvited permitted recreation occurs. Allowing an activity is not equivalent to "invitation". The generalized declaration that a place allows an attractive activity begins to move the place holder into the responsibility to sign the places and remove gross negligence structures or hidden dangers. All visitors should be aware by some means of what kinds of activity that may be occurring at a site. The State, County, and City regularly maintain signage that indicate that certain activities may be occurring at a site. To fulfill the mandate from the people, often multiple activities may be allowed at a particular site.
Privatization of public lands occurs sometimes by faulty machinations perhaps not maliciously intended; but when effective equivalence of privatization occurs to the loss of public access, then supervisors and the public ought to perk up and sharpen their pencils to effect an undoing of unintended results. The Dockweiler historic sand bluff bunny play space "for hang gliding" may be experiencing a default effective privatization via a defective concession permit. The individual recreational hang gliding citizen is seemingly 100% under the control of a private for-profit business that also requires joining a specific private membership organization. Such effective 100% slam seems to effect a solid-wall privatization of public recreational beach relative to the individual citizen that wants to simply arrive with a wing and use the public land set aside for hang gliding

without blocking other beach activities like walking, climbing the little slope, bicycling, flying a kite, tossing a ball, frolicking in the sand and air. The citizens of the State, County, and City ought to be full-face involved when privatization of public lands may be occurring. Falling asleep while the privatization process unfolds could bring long-term and maybe permanent losses of public access to its treasured assets. All citizens of the United States may lose when public lands are privatized, no matter where such may occur in some City, County, or State. The citizens of the USA once had the historic Dockweiler hang gliding site as open and non-privatized. For some years the site was simply closed while the State-County-City fulfilled their safe-access constructions at the site. Then a defective arrangement was made that effectively privatized the site for one business as regards hang gliding; and that business fell into a trap of requiring membership in a third-party private corporation; effective privatization has been occurring and exercising the powers thereof seemingly legally. What may be deeply illegal is a drop in the supervision by the County Board of Supervisors that may not have noticed the effective privatization and consequent inequity flowing from the defective concessionaire agreement. It is time to install open access for the individual recreational hang glider citizen without requiring inequitable burdens of insurance as though the individual was some sort of special-use "event" that is "organized." It is time to install the model of Belmont Kite Zone where multiple instruction businesses are permitted in fair business competition while surely not preventing the individual kiteboarder from visiting and using the public lands configured for some focus on kiteboarding (who does fly and glide and run and swim and move about). The kiteboarder does not have to join some odd third-party private organization, but he or she may. The kiteboarder does not have to pay a fee beyond his or her public taxes to the State, County, and City.
==============
http://www.presstelegram.com/lifestyle/20160715/with-new-kitesurfing-businesses-long-beach-establishes-belmont-kite-zoneAndrew Edwards, Press-Telegram
POSTED: 07/15/16, 6:29 PM PDT wrote:McCourt owns Off the Hook Kiteboarding, one of two new kiteboarding business allowed permits to provide lessons by the California Coastal Commission, and more recently the Long Beach City Council. The city also designated the sandy area near the Claremont Launch Ramp as the place for kiteboarding lessons in the city, dubbing it Belmont Kite Zone.
There are now three kiteboarding businesses in Long Beach: Off the Hook, Captain Kirk’s (also new) and SoCal KiteSurfing, which has operated for eight years. The three companies aren’t allowed to set up permanent storefronts. Managers and instructors instead spend their time in the shade provided by beach shelters (think sand and sunscreen instead of brick and mortar).

- BelmontKiteZoneSign001.JPG (42.39 KiB) Viewed 4916 times
http://wilderness.org/blog/privatization-threatens-your-public-lands

- LongBeachKiteboarder001.JPG (34.28 KiB) Viewed 4913 times