THE BAD EXAMPLE ~ THE LEASEHOLDER CONCESSIONAIRE Torrey Pines Gliderport ~ ABOVE THE LAW
Definition (idiomatic) ~ Exempt from the laws that apply to everyone else.
The Flight director and staff are above the law. Acting as a Company or Association they think they're above the law, but they're not.
A City Leaseholder, a Concessionaire, is in a position where one can avoid being bound by the laws that govern ordinary people. ...
A racketeering operation, extorting public money into private account under the "Color of Office"
"'The problem is a small hardcore group of employees who believe they are above the law."
All seemingly controlled by an executive leaseholder (thug) and staff which think they are above the law.
All approved by our Mayor and city council, WITH no public vote or say as to how our parks are run
Simply Claiming they didn't know and or ... & it's perfectly legal according to his city contract.
Openly Claiming that They represents the City park decisions without question and impunity to common Law
"The Gliderport leaseholder has declared himself above the law, acting with impunity."
"The leaseholder thinks he he has entitlement to funds received by a Corrupted City Lease Agreement"
"The Leaseholder is now commanding the Mayor's office and the city park real estate assets lease agreements"
THE POINT OF CORRUPTION
"The Mayor and the city council is allowing this to happen"
FURTHERMORE
A racketeering operation, Cornering the market for all Sales & Instruction
Making up site rules they don't keep themselves or are not lawful .
Collecting money for what is normally free by there own faculty.
Collecting insurance flight moneys, not needed by normal Law
A Diversion of Public funds into private accounts
The threat of violence towards those who speak out.
Threat of false reports and arrest
Threat of Lic & Rating suspension
Threat of negligent under the influence operation
POSING A THREAT Interfering with a Public witness’s testimony or cooperation in a criminal case is a criminal act that can be misdemeanor or a felony. Intimidating or tampering with a witness involves trying to get a witness to lie, say certain things under oath, alter or destroy evidence, or not testify or cooperate with authorities at all. Examples include:
- asking a witness to testify in a certain way, to lie, to not testify,
to not report a crime or to not cooperate with police- offering a witness a bribe (money, material goods, or some other benefit)
- threatening a witness with physical violence or property damage
- threatening the witness’s family members or loved ones, and
- preventing a witness from attending a legal proceeding, such as a court hearing or deposition.
Some states’ statutes criminalize intentionally influencing a witness by any means. Others require a use of force, threat of force, or use of intimidation or coercion. Under the first type of statute, simply asking a witness to testify or not to testify in your favor constitutes witness tampering. The other statutes require that the person accused actually threatened or intimidated the witness.
Coercion and intimidation can involve threats other than physical violence or property damage. An employer could threaten an employee’s job or promise a promotion if the employee will testify in a certain way or refuse to testify. A witness also could be threatened with harm to his business or reputation.
Who Can Be Accused of Witness Tampering or Intimidation The idea that any person that threatens or tries to influence Public witness’s testimony on behalf of the leaseholder, concessionaire or the prosecution, he has committed a crime. If a Employee, relative or friend of the defendant threatens a witness or someone involved in or supporting the prosecution tries to bribe a witness, for example, both have committed witness tampering.
If the Leaseholder, Concessionaire is involved in witness tampering committed by another person, he also can be charged with a crime. For instance, if the parties involved uses an employee or pays someone to contact a witness or is involved in planning a threat or attack on a witness, he could be charged with witness intimidation or conspiracy to commit the crime.
The Leaseholder, Concessionaire has tried to influence or interfere with the witness's A prosecutor can file charges based on the witness’s statements alone, but some kind of corroborating evidence is necessary to get a conviction.
RCW 9 (1) A person is guilty of intimidating a witness if a person, by use of a threat against a current or prospective witness, attempts to:
(a) Influence the testimony of that person;
(b) Induce that person to elude legal process summoning him or her to testify;
(c) Induce that person to absent himself or herself from such proceedings; or
(d) Induce that person not to report the information relevant to a criminal investigation or the abuse or neglect of a minor child, not to have the crime or the abuse or neglect of a minor child prosecuted, or not to give truthful or complete information relevant to a criminal investigation or the abuse or neglect of a minor child.
(2) A person also is guilty of intimidating a witness if the person directs a threat to a former witness because of the witness's role in an official proceeding.
(3) As used in this section:
(a) "Threat" means:
(i) To communicate, directly or indirectly, the intent immediately to use force against any person who is present at the time; or
(ii) Threat as defined in *RCW 9A.04.110(27).
(b) "Current or prospective witness" means:
(i) A person endorsed as a witness in an official proceeding;
(ii) A person whom the actor believes may be called as a witness in any official proceeding; or
(iii) A person whom the actor has reason to believe may have information relevant to a criminal investigation or the abuse or neglect of a minor child.
(c) "Former witness" means:
(i) A person who testified in an official proceeding;
(ii) A person who was endorsed as a witness in an official proceeding;
(iii) A person whom the actor knew or believed may have been called as a witness if a hearing or trial had been held; or
(iv) A person whom the actor knew or believed may have provided information related to a criminal investigation or an investigation into the abuse or neglect of a minor child.
(4) Intimidating a witness is a class B felony.
(5) For purposes of this section, each instance of an attempt to intimidate a witness constitutes a separate offense.
- Truth Arrows.jpg (12.8 KiB) Viewed 5022 times
by dhmartens » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:16 pm 
Home
