Sign in, say "hi", ... and be welcomed.

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:17 pm

Red wrote:BobK .... BobK ... BobK ... BobK's ... BobK's ... BobK ... BobK ... BobK ... BobK
To Scott:
... BobK ... BobK's ... BobK ...

Once again you write a lot of words to try to hide the fact that you stood by and watched a fellow human being be bullied and silenced. The careful reader will notice that nothing in any of your long "BobK ... BobK ... BobK" tirades addresses that fact. Even if everything you said about "BobK ... BobK ... BobK" were true (which it isn't), it wouldn't change the fact that:

    You watched Joe Faust be banned by Jack Axaopoulos and you did nothing.

There are only three people in that sentence ... and none of them are "BobK". The only thing "BobK" did was document it. That's what draws your hatred and has you seeing "red".

On Dec 29, 2018 at 12:08 pm, Bob Kuczewski wrote:By the way, this topic was on the track of discussing Frank's efforts to reinstate Joe Faust (see original post) until Red chimed in with his "all about Bob" diversions. I predict he'll try that again ...

We didn't have to wait very long did we?
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:18 pm

Red wrote:Jack knows a shill there when he sees one, so if you try to "help out" the people Jack has banned, you will get banned as well.

So anyone who protests Joe's banning must be a "shill"? Is that your "logic"?

I have to say that it's quite a compliment to me that I'm seen as the only person on the planet capable of independently recognizing that Jack banning Joe was wrong. It's also quite an insult to the rest of the human race that none of them could recognize the same injustice (without, of course, being a shill for me).

Personally, I think you're wrong. I think there are plenty of people who recognized it was wrong. That's why Frank spoke up about it. I think Frank was genuinely upset about it. I think a number of others were as well. I think if you'd all banded together, you would have made a real change. You'd have been on the "Wall of Heroes" rather than the "Wall of Shame". But you all chickened out, and now you don't like looking in the mirror that I'm holding up, so you attack me. But I had no involvement other than to urge each of you to speak up. You can call that "manipulation" or any other derogatory term you like, but it was me asking each of you to stand up for Joe Faust. That's what you should have done without my urging anyway. But you didn't.

Red wrote:Jack knows a shill there when he sees one, so if you try to "help out" the people Jack has banned, you will get banned as well.

I quoted you a second time because there's another important point in your statement.:

Red wrote:... if you try to "help out" the people Jack has banned, you will get banned as well.

That's probably the most important thing you've said in the last year Red. And coming from one of Jack's most loyal supporters, it really says a lot. Thanks. That's a keeper!   :thumbup:
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sun Dec 30, 2018 2:16 pm

I had a good phone conversation with Scott today. I enjoy talking with Scott because we've been through so much together over a very long time. Neither of us has to explain the things that have happened in the past because we both know those things first hand.

That's not to say that Scott and I agree on everything. In fact, we've had some bitter disagreements in the past. But we've worked through them because we've recognized our common ground for both hang gliding and justice. Today, Scott helped me to see that we may have a culture gap here at the U.S. Hawks.

A person's "culture" is a complex set of beliefs and standards and customs and perceptions. People of different cultures can get along fine in some endeavors, but they can find themselves bitterly divided when certain wedge issues arise. The banning of Joe Faust has been one of those wedge issues that's exposed a deep cultural division here at the U.S. Hawks.

In my culture - the way I was raised - it is not acceptable to stand by and watch people be abused or bullied. That value was very important to my father and, not surprisinly, it's also very important to me. Scott pointed out that my "culture" also comes from my military service in the Rangers:

"Never shall I fail my comrades."
"I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy"

It's clear to me now (thanks Scott) that Red and I are simply from different cultures. In my culture it's unacceptable for one member of a community (Jack in this case) to bully another member of that same community (Joe). In my culture it's also unacceptable for active members of any community to witness such bullying and remain silent. It's even more unacceptable for members of a community to reward the bully by propping him up with their support.

History has demonstrated that people will defend their cultures to their death, so I doubt there can be any resolution to this back and forth between the two sides. While I would have liked Frank and Mike and Red (and others) to have stood up for Joe Faust, I think I can be satisfied with the (now) very clear record that they would not. Their reasons (or lack of reasons) are now very well documented here for everyone to see. Given the circumstances, that's about the best outcome I can expect.

A while back, Frank asked me to "give it a rest". I didn't feel the issue was clear enough at that time to "give it a rest", but I do now. Anyone reading these topics can come to their own conclusions and support the culture that resonates best with them.

I will never forget what was done to Joe Faust, and I will never forget the participants who enabled that injustice. But the new year is at our doorstep and there's a lot of other work to be done in 2019.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Red » Sun Dec 30, 2018 4:44 pm

Bob Kuczewski wrote:I had a good phone conversation with Scott today. I enjoy talking with Scott because we've been through so much together over a very long time. Neither of us has to explain the things that have happened in the past because we both know those things first hand.
That's not to say that Scott and I agree on everything. In fact, we've had some bitter disagreements in the past. But we've worked through them because we've recognized our common ground for both hang gliding and justice. Today, Scott helped me to see that we may have a culture gap here at the U.S. Hawks.
A person's "culture" is a complex set of beliefs and standards and customs and perceptions. People of different cultures can get along fine in some endeavors, but they can find themselves bitterly divided when certain wedge issues arise. The banning of Joe Faust has been one of those wedge issues that's exposed a deep cultural division here at the U.S. Hawks.
In my culture - the way I was raised - it is not acceptable to stand by and watch people be abused or bullied. That value was very important to my father and, not surprisinly, it's also very important to me. Scott pointed out that my "culture" also comes from my military service in the Rangers:
"Never shall I fail my comrades."
"I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy"

It's clear to me now (thanks Scott) that Red and I are simply from different cultures. In my culture it's unacceptable for one member of a community (Jack in this case) to bully another member of that same community (Joe). In my culture it's also unacceptable for active members of any community to witness such bullying and remain silent. It's even more unacceptable for members of a community to reward the bully by propping him up with their support.
History has demonstrated that people will defend their cultures to their death, so I doubt there can be any resolution to this back and forth between the two sides. While I would have liked Frank and Mike and Red (and others) to have stood up for Joe Faust, I think I can be satisfied with the (now) very clear record that they would not. Their reasons (or lack of reasons) are now very well documented here for everyone to see. Given the circumstances, that's about the best outcome I can expect.
A while back, Frank asked me to "give it a rest". I didn't feel the issue was clear enough at that time to "give it a rest", but I do now. Anyone reading these topics can come to their own conclusions and support the culture that resonates best with them.
I will never forget what was done to Joe Faust, and I will never forget the participants who enabled that injustice. But the new year is at our doorstep and there's a lot of other work to be done in 2019.


BobK,
So, that's IT? You have spent a lot of time, a year and more, and used lots of words to harrass me and try to coerce me into doing something that you want to dress up as "justice" or whatever. Now, after a only few members here have refused to try to clean up your mess, NOW you are ready to quit the "rescue?"

Yeah, sadly, it IS all your mess. Now you NEED others to carry the ball for you.

I can not believe that any real Ranger would ask just a few members of his squad to recover the "fallen" and then abandon the effort as soon as a few people refuse. It's probably a good thing that you never saw combat; a Ranger squad leader so willing to abandon the "fallen" as you did today is usually the kind of person that ends up getting shot at by both sides of the battle.

I have noticed that you have not asked anybody else here to post on HG.ORG as your mouthpiece puppet. Here you can call out any and all frequent-posting members of this forum, by name, as you have done to me. You could post all of the same abuses, innuendo, and insults that you have posted against me, only now, post it against them. After all, this "silent majority" has made the same choices that I made (refusing to be your puppet mouthpiece on another forum). Maybe they know already, that if they act like a shill for BobK on another forum, then they will be treated as such.

It will not be difficult for you to do that coercion; you don't even have to write anything new, just change the salutation name to some members of the "silent majority" here, then Cut and Paste from the same repetitive posts that you have sent at me in your public forum in this last year. You can even give them the exact same speeches to deliver that you wrote for me, which I have refused to deliver, because they were not my words. I have copies of those speeches here, if you need them. You can harangue most of the silent members here for a year or more (much as you did with me). After all, they certainly have been as silent and equally "culpable" in your eyes as I have been, in your campaign against the HG.ORG rules, "unfair" bans, or whatever else that raises your ire. This behaviour from you will almost certainly get the results that you want, only without me.

Please stay true to form; EACH member here gets a year or more of your harrassment and insults, just as you did to me, unless they knuckle under to your demands to be your puppet mouthpiece on another forum.

The only alternative to your coercing of the membership here (that I can see) is to believe that you had some secret agenda, hardly related to "justice" or anything like it, with only certain pilots as your targets. You just wanted shills for your invective, and if these people got banned from another forum, then they could only post here. I do believe that was your real intent, all along. Dressing up all of that dreck as "justice" or "fairness" was just smoke and mirrors. Please prove me wrong here, and only by your actions, not by any excuses. Start the year-long coercion of your good members here. i WANNA WATCH.

I (for one) do not respond well to manipulation. I believe that most members here will say the same.
Cheers,
Red

P.S. Free advice, maybe worth the price,
for new and low-airtime HG pilots, on my web page . . .

https://user.xmission.com/~red/
Red
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Utah, USA, Sol III

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Sun Dec 30, 2018 5:17 pm

Red,

I'm done with you. I asked you as a friend to help a friend and you refused. Read your own history in these topics and then read my replies again, and again, ... and then again. Everything I have to say to you has been said a dozen times. Now you have to live with yourself.

You're free to post here just as anyone else, but in my eyes you'll always be seen as someone who cowered and buckled under your fear of Jack Axaopoulos when your friends needed your help.

Your message above is just more drivel trying to either bait me into your nonsense or to explain why you didn't do what you know you should have done. I've heard it all before, so save it for your buddy Jack who has manipulated you into defending his abuses of good men like Joe and Scott.

Your history on this matter has been well documented, and I feel no need to add any more to the record. I'm looking forward to opening more non-USHPA sites in 2019 and continuing to document who is helping improve hang gliding and who isn't. I think 2019 will be the year of USHGRS, and that's where I'll be putting a lot of my effort. Joe Faust has done a heroic job assembling his rating system, and I'm going to do what I can to help him build it and promote it. You sat silently and watched Jack Axaopoulos mutilate all references to USHGRS, so I won't be expecting anything from you.

References:
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Red » Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:06 pm

*LOL* Now get everybody else here to comply, or refuse, to be your puppet mouthpiece. Don't you want to know who your real friends are? *LOL*
Cheers,
Red

P.S. Free advice, maybe worth the price,
for new and low-airtime HG pilots, on my web page . . .

https://user.xmission.com/~red/
Red
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Utah, USA, Sol III

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby JoeF » Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:59 pm

I've never experienced or read that he wanted puppet mouthpieces, but rather for people to think through the ideas and perhaps go forward with 100% self responsibility. I've experienced his debate manners; ever I was easily understanding that I would take 100% responsibility for whatever I decided to do to support one or more of the causes he presented with rationales put up on the table. The rationales have a right to stand or fall on their own interior logic. Two people sharing an idea does not mean one or the other is a puppet maker.

Hopefully ideas may stand or fall on their own inherent merit irrespective of any promoting person.

If one is participating in forums, what might one require of participants and owner/moderators principle-wise or idea-wise? Each participant in a forum may have his or her own thresholds on certain parameters of conduct in the forum by other participants or the owner/moderator; thresholds on certain parameter may be nil, tiny, or substantial. For some participants, they may participate no matter what, that is, require no disciplines whatsoever over any matter; other participants might decide to stop participating when certain other thresholds are passed. Some participants are OK with owners obliterating the actual words of participants without approval of the authors; some participants are OK with some owners of forums carving out factions of the announced community and thus serving up non-truthful advertising.
Etc. Each participant makes his or her decision to support a particular forum based on the participant's set of thresholds.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby wingspan33 » Sun Dec 30, 2018 11:36 pm

Hey Jack! (Ooopps! I mean RED) I have determined that you have an agenda. That agenda is antithetical to the positive atmosphere and respectful community spirit that we try to maintain here on the US Hawks. By "we" I mean myself, as a long term (founding) member, as well as other board members, as well as many long term general members. As I implied in my intro, you're coming off as the "puppet mouthpiece" for Jack the Axe. The hate and vitriol that your recent posts contain sounds like what I'd image Jack saying if he had the courage to come here and speak on his own. Do I know that you are Jack's "mouthpiece"? No, I do not. But one thing I'm sure of is that you are gaining BIG points from Jack for every negative and defamatory post you put up here with Bob K as the subject. How happy you must be!

But the time has come for you to mute the negativity. It's not time for arguments or justifications. It's time to STOP. Even an 8 year old can understand the word STOP. I'm sure it's part of your vocabulary (one of the words you know).

SG Junior (aka RED) wrote: Now get everybody else here to comply, or refuse, to be your puppet mouthpiece. Don't you want to know who your real friends are?
wingspan33
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:24 pm

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Red » Mon Dec 31, 2018 7:20 am

wingspan33 wrote:Hey Jack! (Ooopps! I mean RED) I have determined that you have an agenda. That agenda is antithetical to the positive atmosphere and respectful community spirit that we try to maintain here on the US Hawks. By "we" I mean myself, as a long term (founding) member, as well as other board members, as well as many long term general members. As I implied in my intro, you're coming off as the "puppet mouthpiece" for Jack the Axe. The hate and vitriol that your recent posts contain sounds like what I'd image Jack saying if he had the courage to come here and speak on his own. Do I know that you are Jack's "mouthpiece"? No, I do not. But one thing I'm sure of is that you are gaining BIG points from Jack for every negative and defamatory post you put up here with Bob K as the subject. How happy you must be!
But the time has come for you to mute the negativity. It's not time for arguments or justifications. It's time to STOP. Even an 8 year old can understand the word STOP. I'm sure it's part of your vocabulary (one of the words you know).
SG Junior (aka RED) wrote: Now get everybody else here to comply, or refuse, to be your puppet mouthpiece. Don't you want to know who your real friends are?

Scott,

How pleasant you make this place! Sir, you are holding the wrong end of the stick! Please note, I have asked BobK to STOP repeatedly here, and he never did. Also please note, ALL of my posts on this topic have been RESPONSES to BokK's continuing harassment, hoping to coerce me into spout his words on another forum. If you like peace and quiet here, I certainly do also; please get BobK off my back. I would not continue responding, if there was no coercion from BobK that needed a response from me. I will be quite content to cease responding, of course. Naturally, I still refuse to be a puppet mouthpiece for anybody.
Cheers,
Red

P.S. Free advice, maybe worth the price,
for new and low-airtime HG pilots, on my web page . . .

https://user.xmission.com/~red/
Red
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Utah, USA, Sol III

Re: Joe's reinstatement in HG.org effort

Postby Bob Kuczewski » Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:07 am

Red (with original capitalization, grammar, and spelling preserved) wrote:Also please note, ALL of my posts on this topic have been RESPONSES to BokK's continuing harassment, hoping to coerce me into spout his words on another forum.

Red, I've attached the full text of your first post to this topic (see below). Can you show "BokK's continuing harassment, hoping to coerce me into spout his words on another forum" in this topic that preceded your post below?

As far as I can tell, my only reference to your name prior to your post was about you making a moral equivalence between Jack and I:

Red keeps repeating his line that it's just two guys who don't get along. That's a lie. There is no moral equivalence between the high regard we've had for our member's posts and the filthy disgusting things that Jack Axaopoulos has done

Do you consider your post below as a "response" to my moral equivalence statement? As I wrote above, I am done with you, but I will step in when I see you making false or misleading statements as you did to Scott. Scott can see your agenda and so can I. Here's your first post to this topic:

Red wrote:
Frank Colver wrote:This battle of the forums is utterly stupid! Let HG.org be HG.org and US Hawks be US Hawks!
I don't give a flying fu*k who is banned from HG.org it's Jack's forum and he can run it any way he wishes. It will live or die on its own merits, we can neither kill it nor save it from here. His forum can be useful for discussions he lets continue, because it reaches a lot of pilots. He can censor anything he doesn't like because, well, it's his forum. This is not a free speech issue, it's a private property issue. If I owned a forum I'd like to run it any way I wanted to and if people didn't like it then it would not get much use.
This whole pissing contest about people being banned is going nowhere and I'm sick of it! Jack's never going to reinstate Bob or Scott and why does anyone care, because it's his choice, not ours. He can ban anyone he doesn't like, he doesn't need a reason because it's his property and Bob can ban anyone he chooses from this forum. If you like using Jack's forum then use it, if you don't like using his forum then stay away. We need to concentrate on building an alternative to HG.org, whether it's this forum or another one.
I understand there are people on this earth who hate each other. Go ahead and fight your personal hatred battles but don't put me in the line of fire.
STOP THE BATTLE OF THE FORUMS NOW! (That would make a great T-shirt)
Bob, you got on my case for using big letters but I notice you make a lot of use of even bigger letters than I. But I don't give a sh*t - use one huge letter per page if you like.
Sick of this bullsh*t!
Frank


Frank,
Sorry, but you may be wasting electrons there; Bob only hears what Bob wants to hear. Nice try, though. You know, I do like what you said.
I think I'm gonna waste some electrons here, too . . . :mrgreen:

Campers,

Note the date of the "changed" post which Bob cited, July 10, 2011.
https://ushawks.org/forum/download/file.php?id=9943&sid=68c8a867afd08d7c9709f830b73682a4
Bob has been nurturing this old grudge for what, seven+ years, with nothing constructive to show for it yet. He may be just generating more hate, but that's a pitiful goal, for any alleged HG forum. Bob still harbors other personal grudges, even older. Who wants to be part of that?

You should know, Bob has to crank up others to do his fighting for him now, because he was an early casualty of his own uneducated tactics. Imagine a combat squad leader telling you, "Hey, I thought a night attack would work; those enemy soldiers in that machine gun nest had no right to use tracer ammo!" It's just one of Murphy's Laws of Combat: No strategy or battle plan ever survives first contact with the enemy, intact. It's very obvious to me, this boy was never at the wrong end of a long-range mortar barrage in real life. Raging at the people firing those mortars just does not help.

Maybe somebody should tell Bob, his high horse is no "war charger;" it is a lame old mule. Bob's "armor" is not shining, it was made from old beer cans. His "battle lance" is just a useless broken broomstick. This lousy "Man of LaMancha" crusade is pure BS. Bob thinks the only way to win is by destroying an enemy. If he studied the writings of Sun Tsu, or the USA Pacific campaign of WW-II, he might learn that the toughest fortresses do not need to be brought down, just bypassed and cut off, to wither on the vine.

He wants us to listen to his "high" level of morality, but remember, this dreck is coming from BobK, who can not understand the simple concepts of "Private Property" or a sign saying "Please keep off the grass." If you have worked to make a fine front lawn for your house, then Bob will want to play polo there, and nobody should have the right to stop him. Really?

I can imagine that Bob is right now filling his poison pen with vitriol again. Yeah, I know, Bob has taken to SHOUTING lately, so you certainly know he's running out of ideas there. What will it be this time, Bob? More character assassinations? More insults? Bullying? Innuendo? Trying to compare li'l Bob's tempest-in-a-teapot squabbles with the true moral struggles of our lifetimes? I have told him straight out; I post where and when I please, and nobody has the right to tell me (or anybody else) what or where to post. I also told him: aside from my own good judgment, another reason I refuse his demands to shill for him is because it makes Bob foam at the mouth, and spit venom everywhere. It's kinda funny to watch, but truly, it's kinda sad, too. I would actually prefer to see Bob enjoying the sunlight, not holed up in a dark place, just spewing more hate. It's no way to live a life, Bob. Don't waste your limited lifetime on hate.


It was clearly dishonest of you, Red, to tell Scott:

Red (with original capitalization, grammar, and spelling preserved) wrote:Also please note, ALL of my posts on this topic have been RESPONSES to BokK's continuing harassment, hoping to coerce me into spout his words on another forum.

Also, for the record, you've conveniently ignored Joe Faust's post above. Coincidentally, that's the same Joe Faust who you watched be banned from hanggliding.org while you said nothing. Maybe you can explain yourself to him. That is, after all, the subject of this topic.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
Every human at every point in history has an opportunity to choose courage over cowardice. Look around and you will find that opportunity in your own time.
Bob Kuczewski
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], JoeF and 97 guests

Options

Return to Hang Gliding General