Al,
Not really sure who or what you're talking about so lemme cover all the bases.
Neither John nor Eric were pioneers in hang gliding and neither invented new ways of killing themselves in the sport.
It's fine that neither of them has been forgotten, it's totally despicable that they died doing stupid needless reruns of other stupid needless deaths and that - in the big picture - NOTHING was or is being learned from them.
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974
"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
Eric was killed on 1990/07/05 by a release system configured to blow him off tow when his nose went up. From 1981 through then and to this present day devices which result in rope breaks - including idiot light weak links and Peter Birren's idiot Pitch and Lockout Limiter - are being hyped as SAFETY equipment by the total a**holes who control this sport.
If you buy the assessments of the eyewitnesses - which I do - John was killed because he was signed off to fly a hang glider without being able to fly a hang glider. One of the main reasons he couldn't fly a hang glider was that he wasn't taught to fly prone on an aircraft designed - and only certified - to be flown prone.
Most hang gliding people have extremely limited cranial capacities and are able to store extremely limited parcels of information. That being the case I would advise your local pilots to clear the space of memories of Eric and/or John to open it up for understandings of how and why they died.
Bob,
Otto Lilienthal died in a glider accident in 1896. Maybe you should mention that as well?
OK.
Otto, Eric, and John were killed as consequences of low level stalls.
Otto's was the least severe of the three. While the other two were killed instantly, he lived until the next day and said, "Small sacrifices must be made!"
He was wrong. He had already developed a device - a "prellbugel" - which, like our control frame, takes a lot of the impact so the pilot doesn't have to. It had saved his life before and, the consensus seems to be, would have again - if he had been using it.
Eric's stall was the MOST severe of the three. He was on tow, plowed into a dust devil right after launch, and was going UP like a ROCKET until his idiot Pitch and Lockout Limiter kicked in. (Read engine failure.) Then he IMMEDIATELY went DOWN like a BRICK. Duh.
John's stall occured because he didn't know how to fly. The reason he didn't know how to fly was because he wasn't TAUGHT how to fly. His training was, instead, geared to teaching him how to land on his feet by executing a radical STALL a couple of feet off the runway. That's not a stunt he really needed to learn. That's not a stunt the vast majority of hang glider pilots really need to learn.
So, to summarize...
Stalls kill people. They undoubtedly kill more people in hang gliding that anything else by a very wide margin. Therefore we should avoid stalling our gliders.
I don't know why Otto stalled but if we had stuffed a Wills Wing Raven and harness into the Wayback Machine and set it for 1896/08/09 08:00 Berlin time he almost certainly wouldn't have. He'd have been WAY less likely to stall to begin with, WAY more likely to recover if he had, and better protected in the crash if he made it that far.
Eric we send a three-string release with the bridle and lanyard halves anchored at his hips and a six hundred pound weaklink.
John we take to the dunes and teach him how to launch standing up with his hands on the downtubes and fly, turn, and land lying down with his hands on the basetube.
If you have a specific comment to make about Al's flight, then that would be helpful to him and to this forum.
1. And, of course, a reminder that less than sixteen months ago a student of the instructor he's using died at the site he's flying 'cause his instruction sucked and he was signed off to go into water way over his head would NOT be helpful to Al and this forum.
2. And, of course, YOU get to decide on behalf of Al and this forum what is and isn't helpful.
But if you just want to take a jab at hang gliding...
I don't wanna take a jab at hang gliding. I LOVE hang gliding. I've made it a lot better for the few people who've taken the time and made the effort to listen. I wanna take jabs at flying around with your hands on the downtubes and/or stalling back into the slope or runway. None of those activities is hang gliding and none does much to enhance or promote it.
...because you've got a grudge against someone...
Maybe you could write some SOPs defining what a grudge is and when US Hawks members are allowed to make critical statements about dangerous and incompetent practices.
Why do we need another organization?
The need for choice on the national level has been clear for some time. The HGAA, for example, was originally formed to be more of a grass roots organization than USHPA. However, it was quickly overtaken by those who again concentrated power and shunned opposing viewpoints. So the US Hawks was formed to provide yet another alternative.
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Everyone has to do their part once in a while. If you see something that's not being done correctly, then it's your duty to speak out. One big difference between the US Hawks and other organizations is that the US Hawks really does honor the free speech of its members.
Then we REALLY need to modify the mission statements for consistency sake.
...then please open a new topic somewhere else.
On the SouthWest Texas forum perhaps.
The topic is "AL's Flight At Packsaddle 10-04-11". My comments are all EXTREMELY RELEVANT to "AL's Flight At Packsaddle 10-04-11". There were some major problems with "AL's Flight At Packsaddle 10-04-11". My comments stay here where people are quite welcome to read or not read them - unless you wanna start using a Davis, Jack, or Tim Herr Button.