Bill wrote:The weaklink broke at 7.5 seconds. The bad landing happened at 28 seconds.
It sure looks like he had plenty of time to do a better landing than that. The weak link break was pretty much a non-event with regard to flight attitude and control. Once that pilot gave the go-ahead to launch, he was going to make a landing one way or another, and he did a poor job on this one.
From what I can tell, if he had broken a stronger weak link, the flight attitude change resulting from that break would have been more dramatic. So while increasing the strength of a weak link does decrease the frequency of breaks, I believe the results of such breaks will be much more dramatic and may present the greater risk.
Let me add that I have very little experience with towing, and I've been somewhat "on the fence" with regard to weak link strength arguments. Watching how mildly the glider responded to this particular break is persuasive evidence for the "lighter" weak link argument. The lighter weak link also protects the pilot from a tug pilot who might release prematurely. The weak link essentially ensures that the tug pilot cannot release you while under dangerously high tow tension ... because you'll never be under dangerously high tow tension.