AirNut wrote:Well, all of this just proves the old maxim: paragliders are superior to hang gliders in every way...until you take off.
AirNut wrote:I found it not like flying at all, but more like dangling from a slow and sluggish parachute (hardly surprising). The sense of 'flying', i.e. carving through the air in all three dimensions, just wasn't there.
That's probably my biggest reason to favor hang gliding. It just
feels more like flying. You're connected directly to your wing. When paragliding, it feels like you're steering by remote control.
Don't get me wrong. I do enjoy both, and I plan to continue both as long as I am healthy enough to fly them. But there's something about hang gliding that is just ... awesome!!!
Regarding the collapse issue, I was also not really aware of the dangers during my early training. In fact, I went to some pretty active sites in my P2 days that I would probably decline now - even as a P4. In fact, in the last few years, I flew my paraglider almost exclusively at coastal sites like Torrey.
Adding to collapse issue, many of the PG pilots generated here in San Diego come through the Torrey Pines school, and they often have a somewhat belligerent attitude toward anyone not in their clique (HG or PG). That's not what flying should be like.
AirNut wrote:As a postscript, I've just joined this forum out of sympathy with your stated goals, even though I'm an Aussie.
We won't hold that against you, mate!!!
AirNut wrote:We in Australia have gone through a similar development, namely our national body, the HGFA, now includes paragliding. As with you guys, HG representation in Oz is being swamped by the paragliding community. Some time back the HGFA even merged our national magazine with the sailplane guys (in the interest of economizing). They did wake up to that bit of nonsense in the end but today we are still saddled with a national magazine that is 90 percent filled with paragliding content.
I've given this a lot of thought, and I do think that one single association could handle multiple sports, but it would need a "constitution" of some sort that guarantees certain "inalienable rights" to each sport so that the larger one doesn't swamp the smaller one. It could also be done with specialized subcommittees within the organization so that each sport has their own dedicated representation. But all of those solutions assume that the people running that association actually WANT fairness. We're at the point with USHPA that I don't think that's true any more. That's why we started the US Hawks.
AirNut wrote:I sincerely hope you can make some headway!
We are. Look, we've even got a guy from Australia signing up on our forum!!!
Welcome aboard AirNut. I look forward to future collaboration on solving our shared problems!!