USHPA recently sent out an email message telling members about what's on the schedule to be changed at the meeting. Great. But when you go to look at what's being changed, the language of the download implies that you cannot post any of the actual proposed changes for discussion!! Typical USHPA secrecy. Don't let the members discuss anything about the association!! So for now, I won't include the actual SOP in my posting. You'll have to go to USHPA's "Members Only" section to download it yourself.
Anyway, one of the proposed changes is yet another re-drafting of SOP 06-01 which covers USHPA Chapters. They're doing everything they can to force all clubs to be biwingual. Now I'm biwingual myself, and I think it's great if the HG and PG pilots in an area can get along in the same club. That makes them both stronger. But when you have a situation (like we do at Torrey) where the local PG-dominated club tells HG pilots to "get lost", then there needs to be an ability for those hang gliding pilots to band together to protect their sport. USHPA is slowly removing the ability for pilots to do this by removing their ability to form clubs of their choosing.
Here's my first response to my own Region 3 Directors with a copy to USHPA President Rich Hass and a few others:
Region 3 Directors (and others),
I have read the recent SOP Changes posted on USHPA's web site and included below. I would like to offer my comments on the proposed SOP 06-01 changes which deal with USHPA Chapters.
First off, I would like to remind all Directors that for much of USHGA's history, ALL of its Chapters were hang gliding chapters because paragliding did not exist. When paragliding was accepted into the association, I don't believe the members were told that their hang gliding clubs would eventually have to become hang gliding AND paragliding clubs. In fact, I'll bet they were told that everything would remain as it had been ... no cause for alarm.
But slowly, USHPA has begun to FORCE paragliding onto hang gliding clubs (and force hang gliding onto paragliding clubs). This is NOT an appropriate role for USHPA. I believe that if the hang gliding pilots who voted to accept paragliding knew that this would happen, there would have been a different outcome. This has been a slow motion version of the "bait and switch".
Furthermore this SOP is an affront to our basic freedom of association. If hang gliding pilots want to have a plain old hang gliding club, they should have that right. If paragliding pilots want to have a plain old paragliding club, they should have that right as well. And pilots who want to form biwingual clubs should be free to do so. Pilots can then choose which clubs they want to support with their membership dollars based on what those clubs support. USHPA has no business telling pilots what kinds of clubs they can and cannot form.
Finally, since this particular SOP appears to be up for redrafting, I'd like to offer my own suggested version in the near future. I haven't written it yet, but it will basically say that Chapters are free to form any kind of clubs that the law allows. It will say that USHPA may encourage biwingual clubs (since USHPA is a biwingual association), but that USHPA will NOT discriminate based on the kinds of clubs that USHPA members choose to form. It will say that USHPA will support ALL of its chapters equally and not play "favorites" ... as USHPA has in the past.
Until then,
Bob Kuczewski
H4/P4, Former Region 3 Director, Club Secretary - Torrey Hawks
Home
