Chris McKeon wrote:I wil not be talking about Flying XC. Because I have received so Much Push-Back Regarding Flying XC when I have put up Posts that where I pointed out positive aspects regarding making an XC Flight.
You're welcome to put up posts about flying cross country (XC) as much as you want. But if you claim that flying XC is superior to other flying, then you may find what you called "Push-Back" from people with other opinions. That's called a discussion (or sometimes an argument), and we allow them here on the U.S. Hawks forum.
Chris McKeon wrote:Being that Glider has some sort of a design Flaw I understand that When it is Turned that it becomes Divergent. Yes it would be fairly hard to Fly a Glider XC when You are not able to Bank it at all.
The Condor 330 banks and turns very nicely given its size. I have personally made hundreds of controlled (and banked) turns on a Condor 330 at Dockweiler and Torrey. The issue (as I understand it) is that the bank angle should be kept relatively low in turns. That's easy to do in snooth coastal ridge lift. The difficulty arises in turbulent conditions where the glider can be involuntary forced into flight attitudes beyond its design limits.
It's important to remember that ALL aircraft (hang gliders, paragliders, helicopters, airplanes, and even rockets) have limitations on the amount of turbulence they can handle. For some aircraft, their limits are so high that they are rarely experienced on the planet earth. For other aircraft, their limits are so low that they may be frequently found "in over their heads".
In all cases, it is the pilot's responsibility to stay within the limitations of their aircraft.