What about Davis? Journalistic Integrity?
If Davis Straub had journalistic integrity he would censor himself from any discussion of "Ron Paul" on every discussion board he is on because he censors even the name of "Ron Paul" in that public medium.
No discussion of Ron Paul on the "OZ Report" forum.
Davis doesn't allow that...
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
"Moderator/journalist, Davis Straub, doesn't allow discussion of "Ron Paul" in his journalistic sandbox, he should just shut his mouth at other campfires:
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22926&sid=7a3537377d70f80a3270956d6a1ad534
when discussion of Ron Paul comes up.
But the question is journalistic integrity.
A problem is that the term doesn't mean much anymore. Journalism doesn't mean much anymore. Today's media is mostly bought and paid for 'presstitutes' that will do anything or say anything they are told. Talking hairdoos, most of them.
Real journalists are few and far between.
Anyway, if Davis has an ounce of integrity, in any form, he will address this issue.
Can he justify being a coward to the name "Ron Paul" on his commercial media forum, and yet freely comment and smear the good name of Dr. Paul, in other forums, without a full disclosure of his own journalistic bias?
Anything?
Real journalists aren't cowards.
What about Davis?
No discussion of Ron Paul on the "OZ Report" forum.
Davis doesn't allow that...
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
"Moderator/journalist, Davis Straub, doesn't allow discussion of "Ron Paul" in his journalistic sandbox, he should just shut his mouth at other campfires:
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22926&sid=7a3537377d70f80a3270956d6a1ad534
when discussion of Ron Paul comes up.
But the question is journalistic integrity.
A problem is that the term doesn't mean much anymore. Journalism doesn't mean much anymore. Today's media is mostly bought and paid for 'presstitutes' that will do anything or say anything they are told. Talking hairdoos, most of them.
Real journalists are few and far between.
Anyway, if Davis has an ounce of integrity, in any form, he will address this issue.
Can he justify being a coward to the name "Ron Paul" on his commercial media forum, and yet freely comment and smear the good name of Dr. Paul, in other forums, without a full disclosure of his own journalistic bias?
Anything?
Real journalists aren't cowards.
What about Davis?
