Yesterday a joyriding "instructor" died as he was giving a ride to a 22-year-old thrill-seeking female tourist in Spain.
This marked 114 paragliding fatalities worldwide during that one-year period for which I have records.
I have no doubt that my information remains incomplete.
This indicates to me that there have never been overall effective improvements in paragliding safety.
How could there be? Without an airframe, all paragliders are subject to collapse in turbulence.
Paragliders frequently kill their helpless falling occupants by unexpected collapse in turbulence within the zone of altitude between about 300 to 10 feet,
where emergency deployment of the reserve is less effective or ineffective.
I have defined this zone of no recourse as the Paraglider Dead Man's Curve.

This means that soaring parachutists, regardless of their skill, are gambling with their lives below 300 feet.
Take off. Landing. Ridge soaring.
Soaring parachutes remain - by absolute fatality numbers - by far, the most dangerous form of parachuting.
Hang glider pilots frequently kill themselves by pilot error.
This means fatalities can be reduced through better training.
Unfortunately, with the advent of paragliding, emphasis on hang gliding safety appears to have markedly decreased.
This should be unacceptable to all hang glider pilots.
A key element in this downturn is the lack of a national hang gliding organization where "safety" means hang glider safety.
This points out a huge difference in the level of risk that participants in these two sports are willing to accept.
Those considering entering one sport or the other should be clear in their minds about this level of risk.
Home





:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/A-1967084-1427814804-5741.jpeg.jpg)
