Bill wrote ::
If we went the insurance route wouldn't it be a better idea to not waive our individual rights, but retain a law firm to protect our rights?
I could be convinced that retaining a law firm would be the best choice. I have had this discussion with an HG instructor in NY and he states cases where state law that is designed to protect land owners failed in court. Example :: Farmer is tired of having snowmobiles pass his property-----he decide to put up signs and fences---snowmobile hits fence--operator is injured and wins a lawsuit

Our legal system seems insane some days----where did good ole logic go ??
It will be hard to convince everyone that this is the way to go but I think you are right. In the mean time however that approach may be limited--No ? So many sites have been insured by USHPA and now the land owners expect it. It's a hard sell to convince them that it's ok and that they are protected without it.
PS--maybe I'll move to New Mexico
