Chris McKeon wrote:I do not know if you are setting up a system so that You can short pack Your Glider after having landed out on an XC flight? For it would be so cool to be able to pack your Glider to a More manageable length. Like when A pilot has landed of about five or ten mikes from a road. I for one have at times been dreadfully low during an X-C flight far from a road. But I would shift into that YOu Must Get Up, Get Up or Else.
Yes, Chris! Such challenge would be a progressive step following the early steps.
Step One of the movement: have a handy HG pack that is pleasant and safe for the public that rides city and intercity buses and does conservative flights at Dockweiler safely and reliably.
Step Two: get similar pack, but have a safe and reliable HG wing for firm soaring at Dockweiler site.
Step Three: get a similar HG pack for conservative high altitude flight.
Step Four: get a similar HG pack for open XC hang gliding; this is the step that you seem to suggest quoted above.
Step One wings need not have the safety and reliability for the conditions that would be met in a Step Four HG.
... over 400 test flights before the prize was won.
How many versions of HGs and test flights will be made before Step One of a " a handy HG pack that is pleasant and safe for the public that rides city and intercity buses and does conservative flights at Dockweiler safely and reliably." Note the subjective items: pack that is "pleasant" and "safe for the public that rides city and intercity buses". Too heavy? Too bulky? Too scary? Too pointy? Too snaggy? Unreliable in shape in pack? Pack shape uncontrollable? Too expensive? Too smelly? Too strange or odd? Too suspect? Too threatening? "too" == "unpleasant"