Development Note Regarding Wing Tip Control on Some Sock TPHGsConsider a control line to the pilot from the wing tip. Explore simple
distortion-of-tip effects.
STAY AWARE OF ERRORS OF PHYSICS IN RESPONSES MADE BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE or NON-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
AI ChatGPT 3.5 wrote:Here’s a detailed exploration of various possible distortions of the wing tip of a TPHG (Telescopic Spar Hang Glider) with a sail-sock design, including how a control line might be attached to achieve each effect:
1. Twisting the Wing Tip (Washout/Washin Adjustment)
Description: Twisting the wing tip can reduce or increase the angle of attack at the tip relative to the rest of the wing. This can influence the stall characteristics and roll control of the glider.
Control Line Attachment: Attach the control line to the trailing edge of the wing tip. When the line is pulled, it should create a torque that twists the tip upward (washout) or downward (washin). The line could run through a series of pulleys or guides along the wing to ensure smooth operation.
2. Flexing the Wing Tip Upward/Downward
Description: Flexing the entire wing tip upward (dihedral effect) or downward (anhedral effect) can modify the lateral stability of the glider. An upward flex increases stability, while a downward flex decreases it, potentially making the glider more maneuverable.
Control Line Attachment: A control line could be attached to a point near the wing tip's spar and run through a guide positioned at the keel or another central location. Pulling the line would flex the spar in the desired direction.
3. Bending the Leading Edge
Description: Bending the leading edge of the wing tip can alter the lift distribution and the aerodynamic profile. This could be used to fine-tune performance in different flight conditions.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be attached directly to the leading edge spar at the wing tip. Pulling this line would create a bending moment, pulling the leading edge either upward or downward depending on the direction of the pull.
4. Pinching the Wing Tip
Description: Pinching the wing tip inward, similar to a bird’s wingtip feathering, could reduce drag and control the tip vortex, potentially improving efficiency.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be attached to both the leading and trailing edges at the tip, converging at a central point where the line is pulled inward, creating the pinching effect. This line might be connected to a small block or pulley system for smooth operation.
5. Flaring the Wing Tip
Description: Flaring the wing tip outward can increase the wing’s effective span and lift. It might be useful during slow flight or landing.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be attached to the trailing edge of the wing tip and connected to a flexible rod or spring that extends outward when the line is pulled. This would flare the tip outwards.
6. Spoiler Effect by Raising the Trailing Edge
Description: Raising the trailing edge at the wing tip acts as a spoiler, reducing lift locally and increasing drag. This could be used for roll control or speed regulation.
Control Line Attachment: The control line would be connected to the trailing edge near the wing tip. Pulling the line would lift the trailing edge, creating the spoiler effect. The line could run along the trailing edge and be anchored near the keel or the pilot's control bar.
7. Compressing the Tip for Camber Change
Description: Compressing the wing tip along its chordwise axis can alter the camber of the tip, affecting lift and drag.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could attach to a mechanism that compresses the tip chordwise. This might involve a small internal frame that collapses slightly when the line is pulled, increasing camber.
8. Curling the Wing Tip Downward
Description: Curling the wing tip downward increases drag and can be used as a braking mechanism or to assist in tight turns.
Control Line Attachment: Attach the control line to the leading edge spar at the tip, and run it to the trailing edge through a curved guide. Pulling the line would draw the leading edge downward, curling the entire tip.
9. Stretching the Wing Tip for Spanwise Extension
Description: Stretching the wing tip outward increases the effective wingspan, improving lift and potentially glide ratio.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be connected to a telescopic or extendable spar within the tip. Pulling the line would extend the spar, increasing the span.
10. Rotating the Wing Tip Vertically
Description: Rotating the wing tip vertically could mimic a small vertical stabilizer or rudder effect, adding yaw control to the glider.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be attached to a hinge mechanism at the base of the wing tip, allowing the tip to rotate about a vertical axis when pulled.
11. Folding the Wing Tip Inward
Description: Folding the wing tip inward reduces the wing's span, which could be used to reduce lift and increase descent rate, useful for rapid descents or tight landing areas.
Control Line Attachment: The control line could be connected to a folding mechanism that collapses the wing tip inward. This might involve a hinge or flexible material at the tip that folds under tension from the control line.
Each of these possible distortions offers different aerodynamic effects and control characteristics. By attaching control lines to various points and incorporating guiding mechanisms, these effects can be harnessed to enhance the performance and maneuverability of a TPHG with a sail-sock design.
================
My prompt: Recall, please, in all posts: TPHG is to mean Tiny-Packed Hang Glider that is packed for a polite and safe carry on city buses; thank you.
ChatGPT
Thank you for the reminder. I'll make sure to refer to TPHG as "Tiny-Packed Hang Glider" with the context of being packed for polite and safe carry on city buses in all relevant posts. If you have any other preferences or details you'd like to emphasize, feel free to let me know!
==================
My prompt:Explore this: At 1 ft from the wing tip, have a line connected to the top of the sock at high camber and to the bottom of the sock at that same station. Then at the middle of that line attach the long control line to the pilot. When the pilot pulls the long line, then the small vertical line goes off straight and forms a V shape. The effect would put a dimple in the upper sail sock and in the lower sail sock. That dimple would change the aerodynamics of the wing tip. Explore this arrangement in detail for a TPHG. Explore the low mass involved to get effects.
ChatGPT
Let's explore this innovative control mechanism for a Tiny-Packed Hang Glider (TPHG), which is designed to create a dimple in the upper and lower surfaces of the sail sock at a point 1 foot from the wing tip. The goal is to induce a change in the aerodynamics of the wing tip using a low-mass system.
Concept Overview:
Key Components:
Vertical Line (V-Line): A short line connecting the top and bottom of the sail sock at a point 1 foot from the wing tip. This line is taut when not under load.
Long Control Line: A line connected to the middle of the V-Line that runs back to the pilot’s control system.
Attachment Points: The V-Line is attached to the sail sock at two points: one on the upper surface (high camber) and one on the lower surface (low camber).
Mechanism of Action:
Initial State (No Tension):
The V-Line is straight and taut, connecting the top and bottom of the sock without causing any distortion. The wing tip maintains its standard aerodynamic shape, with the sail sock smoothly wrapping around the spar and maintaining the designed camber.
Pulling the Long Control Line:
When the pilot pulls the long control line, it exerts a force on the middle of the V-Line.
The V-Line, being anchored at both ends to the sail sock, is pulled into a V-shape, creating dimples in both the upper and lower surfaces of the sail sock.
The dimple on the upper surface forms a localized area of reduced camber, while the dimple on the lower surface may either increase or decrease camber depending on the exact geometry.
Aerodynamic Effects:
Upper Surface Dimple: The dimple reduces the effective camber of the upper surface at that station, which could reduce lift locally and potentially introduce a small vortex or other flow disturbance. This might lead to a reduction in tip lift or an increase in drag, influencing roll control or tip stall characteristics.
Lower Surface Dimple: Depending on the depth and shape of the dimple, it could either increase drag or, paradoxically, reduce drag by changing the airflow pattern. The interaction between the upper and lower dimples could also introduce complex flow effects that might enhance maneuverability or stability at the wing tip.
Overall Effect: The combined action of the dimples could result in a subtle but significant alteration of the tip's aerodynamic properties, allowing the pilot to fine-tune performance during flight.
Considerations for Low-Mass Design:
Materials for the V-Line and Control Line:
Dyneema or Spectra Lines: These are ideal for both the V-Line and the long control line due to their high strength-to-weight ratio. Dyneema lines are incredibly light and strong, minimizing additional mass while maintaining durability.
Lightweight Pulleys or Guides: The control line may require pulleys or low-friction guides to ensure smooth operation. These should be made from lightweight materials like titanium or aluminum alloys to keep the system's mass minimal.
Attachment to Sail Sock:
Reinforced Anchor Points: The points where the V-Line attaches to the sail sock (both top and bottom) need to be slightly reinforced to handle the localized tension without tearing the fabric. This could be achieved with small patches of high-strength sailcloth or additional stitching.
Low-Mass Connectors: Use low-mass connectors like small stainless steel or titanium clips to attach the V-Line and control line to the sail sock and the control system.
Impact on Overall Mass:
Given the use of ultra-light materials and the minimal length of the lines, the additional mass introduced by this system would be negligible. The V-Line itself would add minimal drag and weight, while the control line, running back to the pilot, would be virtually unnoticeable in terms of additional mass.
Pilot Control and Practical Application:
Ease of Control: The control system should be designed to require minimal force to activate, allowing the pilot to make fine adjustments during flight. The long control line could be routed through the control bar or connected to a small lever or handle for easy access.
Dynamic Adjustment: By varying the tension on the control line, the pilot can dynamically adjust the magnitude of the dimples and therefore the aerodynamic response of the wing tip. This provides a versatile tool for adjusting performance in real-time based on flight conditions.
Testing and Calibration: The exact aerodynamic effects of the dimples would need to be tested and calibrated during initial flights. The position, size, and shape of the dimples could be fine-tuned to achieve the desired balance between control authority and stability.
Conclusion:
This proposed control mechanism for a TPHG offers a creative and low-mass solution for altering the aerodynamic properties of the wing tip. By inducing dimples in both the upper and lower surfaces of the sail sock, the pilot can achieve subtle changes in lift, drag, and flow characteristics, potentially enhancing the glider's maneuverability and performance. The system is lightweight, easy to implement, and offers the pilot a new level of control over the wing's aerodynamics.
Home
Add or delete such ribs as wanted in an experiment.
