US Hawks Hang Gliding Association • View topic

by **dhmartens** » Wed May 06, 2026 10:56 pm

https://www.firstpost.com/world/trump-a ... 008056.htm
The grays were cloned which is a sin but their souls can be saved, their creators have commited the sin. The AI lawyer said to include my federal investigation in all correspondance: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) conducted an initial review of the allegation and determined further review by another government office is warranted. CBP has transferred your allegation to National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center for processing.

e-Allegation Case Number e00003641 was transferred on 8/31/2022.

CBP takes all trade violation allegations seriously and is committed to protecting U.S. industries and businesses from unfair trade practices, however the Trade Secrets Act, the Privacy Act, and other CBP regulations and related statutes prevent us from sharing specific case information about your allegation.

Further information regarding your allegation may be requested by contacting the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center via email at IPRcenter@dhs.gov. Please cite your e-allegation number in any correspondence. Please be aware that CBP cannot guarantee that any the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center is able to provide detailed updates.

Thank you for helping us to protect the U.S. economy.

by **dhmartens** » Thu May 07, 2026 11:32 pm

So 3 members of my band worked at treasury dept, and 1 does research for darpa and us naval dept and we back Steve Murillo. Sony stock dropped 20 billon dollars in one day, whos next.

by **dhmartens** » Fri May 08, 2026 9:43 pm

She chose a new boyfriend and I have to live with it:

by **choppergirl** » Thu May 14, 2026 7:53 pm

by **choppergirl** » Fri May 15, 2026 7:22 pm

If anyone has any old hang glider photos like from the 1960's or 70's... they want me to toss into AI and colorize, shoot them my way and I'll let A.I. give it a shot... choppergirl@air-war.org
or you can do it yourself here: https://chatgpt.com/ Just prompt "colorize this photo" and click the plus button to upload

by **Bob Kuczewski** » Sat May 16, 2026 2:12 pm

choppergirl wrote:If anyone has any old hang glider photos like from the 1960's or 70's... they want me to toss into AI and colorize, shoot them my way and I'll let A.I. give it a shot...

Thanks for that kind offer.

Thanks also for mentioning the use of AI in your post. We don't have any rules about AI generated content, but I think it's very nice when people make it known that they're posting something that was created with even some assistance from AI. Thanks for doing that. :thumbup:

P.S. The issue of AI / human authorship is beginning to spring up in various places. Here's one example:

xeiaso.net wrote:
Using Assisted-by commit footers instead of banning AI tools
Published on 2025-11-02, 463 words, 2 minutes to read

It sounds like ceding ground to the pro-AI crowd, however if you get people to be honest about it then everyone benefits.

Something I've seen around the internet is that many projects want a blanket policy of no AI tools being allowed for contributors. As much as I agree with the sentiment of policies like this, I don't think it's entirely realistic because it's trivial to lie about not using them when you actually do.

I think a better middle ground is something like Fedora's AI-Assisted Contributions Policy. This demands that you include a commit footer that discloses what AI tools you've used in your process, such as this:

Assisted-by: GPT-OSS 120b via OpenAI Codex (locally hosted)

Amusingly, you can actually tell AI agents to write this commit footer and they'll happily do it. Consider this part of this repo's AGENTS.md file (AGENTS.md is a set of instructions for AI agents to know how to best contribute to the policy):

Attribution Requirements

AI agents must disclose what tool and model they are using in the "Assisted-by" commit footer:

Assisted-by: [Model Name] via [Tool Name]

Example:

Assisted-by: GLM 4.6 via Claude Code

Not only does this make it trivial for automation to detect when AI tools are being used (and add appropriate tagging so reviewers can be more particular), it lets you know which AI tools cause more issues in the longer run. This can help guide policy and assist contributors that want to use AI tooling into picking the best tools for the job.

Anyways, at a high level if you ask people to disclose what AI tools they are using and make it so that the default configuration of most AI tooling will just add that disclosure for you, people are much more likely to comply with that policy. I think that this is a better middle ground than having witch hunts trying to figure out who used what tool and letting it become a free ground for noisy, low‑quality contributions.

I want to see a future where people are allowed to experiment with fancy new tools. However, given the risks involved with low‑effort contributions causing issues, I think it's better for everyone to simply require an easy machine‑readable footer.

Also, if you want to put "Assisted-by: GNU Emacs", I won't stop you.

by **dhmartens** » Sun May 17, 2026 9:30 pm

Moments ago 10 minutes I was just attacked by a UFO in Reseda and captired the video on my iphone 14:

It can fake the audio of a helicopter.
Sorry if I used derrogitory language.