Post new topic    Reply to topic    Forum Index ->HGAA: Call for Leaders and Founders
 
sg
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 9845
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #121    
ACTION ITEM:

We need to settle on a name an domain name before I can build anything for the community to go crazy with.

Can someone pull together all the names so far? Lets take a vote or add a few more.

_________________

H4, AT, FL, TFL, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C
Aeros Stealth III 142

"To be what you've never been you must do what you've never done." - Unknown
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #122    
They sound like good ideas to me Joey. I particularly like the idea of pilots helping pilots.

Let me make another pitch to have people post their ideas to the Wiki:

http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/New_National_Flying_Organization

That way we can begin to consolidate them by their category:

- Name
- Purpose
- Insurance
- Organizational Structure
- Membership Benefits
- Membership Classes (and costs)
- Training and Rating Programs
- Instructors
- Competition
- Classes of Wings
...

I know that learning how to use the Wiki isn't a lot of fun, but I encourage everyone to go there and try to add something - even if it's just adding your real name to the Founding Members list (in no particular order).

Part of what will make the new organization efficient (and hopefully lower cost) is our willingness to embrace technology from the very beginning. So I'd really like to see all Founding Members editing those Wiki pages regularly. Please send me a PM if you need any help.

Thanks.

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #123    
sg wrote:
ACTION ITEM:

We need to settle on a name an domain name before I can build anything for the community to go crazy with.

Can someone pull together all the names so far? Lets take a vote or add a few more.

How about if we set a deadline for that? Is there a time frame you're considering? One day? 3 days? 10 days?

Thanks.

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
sg
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 9845
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #124    
Names in the WIKI so far, any others?

AHGA American Hang Gliding Association
HGAA Hang Gliding Association of America
HGAUSA Hang Gliding Association USA (hgausa.org - already donated to the organization)
FSA Footlaunch Soaring Association fsa.aero
USA Ultralight Soaring Association, domain: usa.aero
USHGA United States Hang Gliding Association (previous name of USHPA - may be a legal battle)
USFLA United States Foot Launch Association
FLAPA Foot Launched/Landed Aircraft Pilot's Assciation
NAHGA North American Hang Gliding Association
American Delta Wing Pilots' Association
American Aero Wing Pilots' Association
UHGCA United Hang Glider Clubs of America ----> A tribal kind of idea...

_________________

H4, AT, FL, TFL, AWCL, CL, FSL, RLF, TUR, X-C
Aeros Stealth III 142

"To be what you've never been you must do what you've never done." - Unknown
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
Holger
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 805
Location: Portland, OR

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #125    
bobk wrote:
- Name
- Purpose
- Insurance
- Organizational Structure
- Membership Benefits
- Membership Classes (and costs)
- Training and Rating Programs
- Instructors
- Competition
- Classes of Wings

Bob, how about doing this topic by topic, since we're not in one room with full attention to the matter?

I suggest we pick 1 topic, discuss it, vote on it and move on to the next. First topic is the name and domain name. The wiki is also not ideal as we'll get write conflicts if we all start editing those handful pages. I'd keep it in a forum (separate, if possible) until we have a decision, then one of us writes it into the wiki. Or a few write on it, but not all.
Send private message  
 Rate this post
gluesniffer
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 319
Location: 5150

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #126    
Keep the costs down please.. I already pay 270 a year- 50 dollars extra is something I can handle during the transition period.

20 dollars for insurance, where does the extra 50 go?

lets pass the savings on to the pilots

Count the glue man in! thumbsup

_________________
"Truth is the highest God" - Gandhi
Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it
Send private message  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #127    
sg wrote:
Names in the WIKI so far, any others?

AHGA American Hang Gliding Association
HGAA Hang Gliding Association of America
HGAUSA Hang Gliding Association USA (hgausa.org - already donated to the organization)
FSA Footlaunch Soaring Association fsa.aero
USA Ultralight Soaring Association, domain: usa.aero
USHGA United States Hang Gliding Association (previous name of USHPA - may be a legal battle)
USFLA United States Foot Launch Association
FLAPA Foot Launched/Landed Aircraft Pilot's Assciation
NAHGA North American Hang Gliding Association
American Delta Wing Pilots' Association
American Aero Wing Pilots' Association
UHGCA United Hang Glider Clubs of America ----> A tribal kind of idea...

I got a PM from a fellow named Mark who suggested (with partial humor):

SHAG Some Hang, All Glide.
FLAG Foot launch and glide.
Wind Spirits.
Upshots.
Wind Sliders.
Quantum Monkeys.

I think JH is already using Upshots and I wouldn't want to conflict with him. The others can probably go on the list. Smile

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #128    
Holger wrote:
bobk wrote:
- Name
- Purpose
- Insurance
- Organizational Structure
- Membership Benefits
- Membership Classes (and costs)
- Training and Rating Programs
- Instructors
- Competition
- Classes of Wings

Bob, how about doing this topic by topic, since we're not in one room with full attention to the matter?

I suggest we pick 1 topic, discuss it, vote on it and move on to the next. First topic is the name and domain name. The wiki is also not ideal as we'll get write conflicts if we all start editing those handful pages. I'd keep it in a forum (separate, if possible) until we have a decision, then one of us writes it into the wiki. Or a few write on it, but not all.

I'll welcome the day when we start having update conflicts on the Wiki!!! Smile

But I like your idea as well. The only problem is that I think we should let much of this happen over a period of weeks and not hours. I'm concerned that there may be people who haven't really followed this topic or may not even be members of hanggliding.org right now. I'd like to allow some time for more people to be involved on the "ground floor" level.

Having said all that, picking a name does start to give us a rallying point, and I wouldn't object to that being done sooner. How do you think we should proceed? Do I hear a motion on the floor?

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
Holger
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 805
Location: Portland, OR

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #129    
bobk wrote:
The only problem is that I think we should let much of this happen over a period of weeks and not hours. I'm concerned that there may be people who haven't really followed this topic or may not even be members of hanggliding.org right now.

Certainly. It will take a good while until we have the whole thing hammered out. If we get the name and some basics in place until 7/4 it's already a success. We'll have many weeks of discussing each topic. Also, we don't have to have everything in place, since we'll be dependent on USHPA for quite a while (at least until there is an alternative insurance). For now, I view this new org more like a political party that works within the existing system. It doesn't have to be a complete system right away.
Send private message  
 Rate this post
$!><
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 543
Location: Connecticut

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #130    
Quote:
ACTION ITEM:

We need to settle on a name an domain name before I can build anything for the community to go crazy with.

Can someone pull together all the names so far? Lets take a vote or add a few more.
Ditto Ditto Ditto

I tried saying this a few posts ago. Once we have a name then we have something to start working with and things can start moving forward.

Lets set a deadline for names to be submitted for consideration no later than Sunday June 13th and then have a vote on them which will end Sunday June 20th. We should probably take the list of names BobK has collected and count votes ONLY from the people that are on the list. Setting up a Poll may not be the best idea because anyone would be able to cast their vote. Unless of course we don't care about members voting on a name. It may even be better having everyone voting on a list of names we throw together that way we get the best accepted name by more than 20 people. If we have 20 names and 20 people each voting for 1 or two name selection based on two votes would kinda be pretty lame.

_________________
$!><
____________

Live while you are alive.
Kilo-Bravo-One-Uniform-Charlie-Victor
Hang Hang
WW-Sport 2 175
Z5
http://www.vimeo.com/swineflew
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
Holger
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 805
Location: Portland, OR

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #131    
Let's have both: a public poll and voting of the members by name. I'm not sure every vote on the public poll is one with the intent to find the best name for a new org.
Send private message  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #132    
$!>< wrote:
Lets set a deadline for names to be submitted for consideration no later than Sunday June 13th and then have a vote on them which will end Sunday June 20th. We should probably take the list of names BobK has collected and count votes ONLY from the people that are on the list. Setting up a Poll may not be the best idea because anyone would be able to cast their vote. Unless of course we don't care about members voting on a name. It may even be better having everyone voting on a list of names we throw together that way we get the best accepted name by more than 20 people. If we have 20 names and 20 people each voting for 1 or two name selection based on two votes would kinda be pretty lame.

I second that motion. I'm happy with those dates, but I'd like to know if there's anyone else who would like to offer suggestions or modifications?

Also, for the record, this is the current list of names as of the time of the motion:

Wingspan34
JB
SG
joefaust
HangLoose
Eddie Paul
Holger
$!><
darkcloud
blindrodie
tipvortex
Rebardan (?)
slimchance (?)
Windlord
OSCAR
bobk
Dennis D
SkyPilot
knumbknuts
SeeMarkFly
mtpilot
HGXC
fly,surf,&ski
BBJCaptain
jspin72
ChattaroyMan
Davedebogusone
miguel
synclavier
Jason
hgflyer
gluesniffer

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #133    
Actually, on second thought, would you accept a friendly amendment to first vote on picking the top 2 or 3 names and then vote again among just those 2 or 3 (so we don't end up with the situation where the winner gets only 2 or 3 votes).

Also, I think our name will depend on what domain names are actually available, so that will have to be researched as well.

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
$!><
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 543
Location: Connecticut

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #134    
Quote:
Let's have both: a public poll and voting of the members by name. I'm not sure every vote on the public poll is one with the intent to find the best name for a new org.


I see what you are saying about the public voting, but if WE are providing the names to vote on, then it really is not that big of a deal. It isn't like they will have the ability to fudge the name process by putting their own BS name in that gets voted to the top.

As it is right now there are about a dozen names and about 3 dozen "members" if everyone votes for a different name and then the remainder of voters do likewise, we will have the victor being a name that got maybe 4 votes and the runner up 3 votes if we limit it to a members only vote.
Maybe we can do a public first and then take the top 3 or 4 and have the members vote on them.

Maybe this is what you were trying to say..... Mr. Green But I just had to type it out.

_________________
$!><
____________

Live while you are alive.
Kilo-Bravo-One-Uniform-Charlie-Victor
Hang Hang
WW-Sport 2 175
Z5
http://www.vimeo.com/swineflew
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
Holger
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 805
Location: Portland, OR

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #135    
bobk wrote:
Actually, on second thought, would you accept a friendly amendment to first vote on picking the top 2 or 3 names and then vote again among just those 2 or 3 (so we don't end up with the situation where the winner gets only 2 or 3 votes).

Also, I think our name will depend on what domain names are actually available, so that will have to be researched as well.

Yes! Also remember, we could pick a .aero domain if .org or .us is taken.
Send private message  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #136    
Actally, I just thought of one other way to do the vote.

We could have each person list their choices in order of preference and then pick the weighted winner. I'm sure there's a procedure for this kind of voting that makes it somewhat "optimal".

By the way, this little dilemma of picking a name is a good test to see how well this small group can cooperate to make progress.

If it turns into a disaster, then we're doomed. ROFL

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
$!><
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 543
Location: Connecticut

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #137    
Quote:
We could have each person list their choices in order of preference and then pick the weighted winner.


A straight vote using the existing polling built into this site would be the best way to go. Having people make a list and copying the names right could turn into a disaster. Survival of the fittest is the best way. Click a button, vote and let the computer do the work. The top three names move on to the next round.

_________________
$!><
____________

Live while you are alive.
Kilo-Bravo-One-Uniform-Charlie-Victor
Hang Hang
WW-Sport 2 175
Z5
http://www.vimeo.com/swineflew
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
bobk
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1896
Location: San Diego

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #138    
For information only: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting

Wikipedia wrote:
Different voting systems use different types of vote. Suppose that the options in some election are Alice, Bob, Charlie, Daniel, and Emily and they are all vying for the same position:

In a voting system that uses a single vote, the voter selects his or her most preferred candidate. "Plurality voting systems" use single votes.

A development on the single vote system is to have two-round elections, or repeat first-past-the-post. However, the winner must win by 50% plus one, called a simple majority. If subsequent votes must be used, often a candidate, the one with the fewest votes or anyone who wants to move their support to another candidate, is removed from the ballot.

An alternative to the Two-round voting system is the single round Preferential voting system (Also referred to as Alternative vote or Instant run-off) as used in Australia, Ireland and some states in the USA. Voters rank each candidate in order of preference (1,2,3 etc). Votes are distributed to each candidate according to the preferences allocated. If no single candidate has 50% or more votes then the candidate with the least votes is excluded and their votes redistributed according to the voters nominated order of preference. The process repeating itself until a candidate has 50% or more votes. The system is designed to produce the same result as an exhaustive ballot but using only a single round of voting.

In a voting system that uses a multiple vote, the voter can vote for any subset of the alternatives. So, a voter might vote for Alice, Bob, and Charlie, rejecting Daniel and Emily. Approval voting uses such multiple votes.

In a voting system that uses a ranked vote, the voter has to rank the alternatives in order of preference. For example, they might vote for Bob in first place, then Emily, then Alice, then Daniel, and finally Charlie. Preferential voting systems, such as those famously used in Australia, use a ranked vote.

In a voting system that uses a scored vote (or range vote), the voter gives each alternative a number between one and ten (the upper and lower bounds may vary). See range voting.

Some "multiple-winner" systems may have a single vote or one vote per elector per available position. In such a case the elector could vote for Bob and Charlie on a ballot with two votes. These types of systems can use ranked or unranked voting, and are often used for at-large positions such as on some city councils.

This level of thought may not be needed to choose a name, but if we're going to build a better mousetrap in the long run, we should come up with a good system for voting that gives us what we want - especially useful in this kind of on-line process. I would also advocate for a system where our votes are public since we're effectively the "Board Members" at this point. The other advantage of public voting is that there's less chance for "monkey business" in counting or anything else. We should all be willing to stand behind how we vote. At least that's what I believe.

_________________
Bob Kuczewski: H4/P4 - Torrey Hawks, CSS, SHGA, E-Team, Soboba Soaring, Founding Member of the HGAA
Learn to fly hang glidersJoin the Torrey HawksFly the Big O Loop!!
"Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it" - gs


Last edited by bobk on Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
$!><
2 thumbs up
2 thumbs up


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 543
Location: Connecticut

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #139    
Quote:
This level of thought may not be needed to choose a name, but if we're going to build a better mousetrap in the long run, we should come up with a good system for voting that gives us what we want - especially useful in this kind of on-line process.


Agreed. I think the name can be picked with what we have. Once we have a name, we can then make a site, and then build a more elaborate and logical way of doing things. Gotta lay the first brick somewhere and that starts with the name.

_________________
$!><
____________

Live while you are alive.
Kilo-Bravo-One-Uniform-Charlie-Victor
Hang Hang
WW-Sport 2 175
Z5
http://www.vimeo.com/swineflew
Send private message Blog  
 Rate this post
gluesniffer
3 thumbs up
3 thumbs up


Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 319
Location: 5150

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote #140    
so true bob

I am cool with most names as long as it represents a hang glide organization.

I think we all should remain flexible on names and be open to changing names and logos in the future if something better arises.

Also if anyone has thought of a name that they know kicks azs, maybe they should go ahead and pay for the name just in case some one reads our OPEN Smile discussions and buys the preferred name out from under us Shocked

or am i just paranoid

_________________
"Truth is the highest God" - Gandhi
Hang Gliding must be represented by an organization that cannot survive without it
Send private message  
 Rate this post
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Forum Index
 
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous   1 , 2 , 3 ... 6 , 7, 8 ... 16 , 17 , 18   Next
Page 7 of 18